{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16872"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16872","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Top-down and bottom-up influences on action and inhibition","abstract":"A series of studies with complex Go/No-Go tasks systematically examined the influence of tasks that require different combinations of Go and No-Go responses. Specifically, this thesis investigated how commission and omission errors are influenced by the actual distribution of the responses required during the trials (bottom-up factor) and a response mapping rule provided in the beginning (top-down factor). Results indicated that the Go-trial proportion and the Go-mapping rule moderate action (Go responses) and action inhibition (No-Go response) in different ways. Experiment 1 found that a high-Go-trial proportion that coincided with a high-Go-mapping rule produced significantly higher commission-error rates, lower omission-error rates, and shorter hit RTs than a low Go-trial proportion that coincided with a low Go-mapping rule. Experiments 2 and 3 differentiated the effect of the Go-trial proportion from the effect of the Go-mapping rule. These two experiments revealed that a higher Go-trial proportion increased commission-error rates but decreased omission-error rates, whereas a higher Go-mapping rule increased both commission-error rates and omission-error rates. Implications for designing effective behavioral programs are discussed.","abstract_html":"A series of studies with complex Go/No-Go tasks systematically examined the influence of tasks that require different combinations of Go and No-Go responses. Specifically, this thesis investigated how commission and omission errors are influenced by the actual distribution of the responses required during the trials (bottom-up factor) and a response mapping rule provided in the beginning (top-down factor). Results indicated that the Go-trial proportion and the Go-mapping rule moderate action (Go responses) and action inhibition (No-Go response) in different ways. Experiment 1 found that a high-Go-trial proportion that coincided with a high-Go-mapping rule produced significantly higher commission-error rates, lower omission-error rates, and shorter hit RTs than a low Go-trial proportion that coincided with a low Go-mapping rule. Experiments 2 and 3 differentiated the effect of the Go-trial proportion from the effect of the Go-mapping rule. These two experiments revealed that a higher Go-trial proportion increased commission-error rates but decreased omission-error rates, whereas a higher Go-mapping rule increased both commission-error rates and omission-error rates. Implications for designing effective behavioral programs are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wang, Wei"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Albarracin, Dolores"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-08-20T18:00:28Z","date_published":"2010-08-20T18:00:28Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z","subjects":["Action","inhibition","Go/No-Go","behavioral facilitation","action and inaction goals"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2010 Wei Wang"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16872","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Albarracin, Dolores"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wang, Wei"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-08-20T18:00:28Z","2010-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Action","inhibition","Go/No-Go","behavioral facilitation","action and inaction goals"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2010 Wei Wang"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16872"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["A series of studies with complex Go/No-Go tasks systematically examined the influence of tasks that require different combinations of Go and No-Go responses. Specifically, this thesis investigated how commission and omission errors are influenced by the actual distribution of the responses required during the trials (bottom-up factor) and a response mapping rule provided in the beginning (top-down factor). Results indicated that the Go-trial proportion and the Go-mapping rule moderate action (Go responses) and action inhibition (No-Go response) in different ways. Experiment 1 found that a high-Go-trial proportion that coincided with a high-Go-mapping rule produced significantly higher commission-error rates, lower omission-error rates, and shorter hit RTs than a low Go-trial proportion that coincided with a low Go-mapping rule. Experiments 2 and 3 differentiated the effect of the Go-trial proportion from the effect of the Go-mapping rule. These two experiments revealed that a higher Go-trial proportion increased commission-error rates but decreased omission-error rates, whereas a higher Go-mapping rule increased both commission-error rates and omission-error rates. Implications for designing effective behavioral programs are discussed.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-05-06T17:46:42Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_Wei.docx: 86732 bytes, checksum: 0d72993c50d29c40cf9bf7d023bd04f8 (MD5) Wang_Wei.pdf: 399605 bytes, checksum: 0f0f188471cad931db158cf18ae69a31 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-20T18:00:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Wang_Wei.pdf: 399605 bytes, checksum: 0f0f188471cad931db158cf18ae69a31 (MD5) Wang_Wei.docx: 83989 bytes, checksum: 3695768cd504472fdcd8a8b320a11379 (MD5) 1_Wang_Wei.pdf: 399659 bytes, checksum: a62a638f778ae194b269a69054efc1a9 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: ff8b60509016ce71e727fc06fbe48533 (MD5) 1_license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 834420ca6a7ccc63b631f7cadb73278c (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Top-down and bottom-up influences on action and inhibition"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Albarracin, Dolores"],"dc:creator":["Wang, Wei"],"dc:date":["2010-08-20T18:00:28Z","2010-08"],"dc:description":["A series of studies with complex Go/No-Go tasks systematically examined the influence of tasks that require different combinations of Go and No-Go responses. Specifically, this thesis investigated how commission and omission errors are influenced by the actual distribution of the responses required during the trials (bottom-up factor) and a response mapping rule provided in the beginning (top-down factor). Results indicated that the Go-trial proportion and the Go-mapping rule moderate action (Go responses) and action inhibition (No-Go response) in different ways. Experiment 1 found that a high-Go-trial proportion that coincided with a high-Go-mapping rule produced significantly higher commission-error rates, lower omission-error rates, and shorter hit RTs than a low Go-trial proportion that coincided with a low Go-mapping rule. Experiments 2 and 3 differentiated the effect of the Go-trial proportion from the effect of the Go-mapping rule. These two experiments revealed that a higher Go-trial proportion increased commission-error rates but decreased omission-error rates, whereas a higher Go-mapping rule increased both commission-error rates and omission-error rates. Implications for designing effective behavioral programs are discussed.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-05-06T17:46:42Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_Wei.docx: 86732 bytes, checksum: 0d72993c50d29c40cf9bf7d023bd04f8 (MD5) Wang_Wei.pdf: 399605 bytes, checksum: 0f0f188471cad931db158cf18ae69a31 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-20T18:00:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Wang_Wei.pdf: 399605 bytes, checksum: 0f0f188471cad931db158cf18ae69a31 (MD5) Wang_Wei.docx: 83989 bytes, checksum: 3695768cd504472fdcd8a8b320a11379 (MD5) 1_Wang_Wei.pdf: 399659 bytes, checksum: a62a638f778ae194b269a69054efc1a9 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: ff8b60509016ce71e727fc06fbe48533 (MD5) 1_license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 834420ca6a7ccc63b631f7cadb73278c (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16872"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2010 Wei Wang"],"dc:subject":["Action","inhibition","Go/No-Go","behavioral facilitation","action and inaction goals"],"dc:title":["Top-down and bottom-up influences on action and inhibition"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z"}