{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16770"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16770","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control","abstract":"Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as extremely cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that general goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas general goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.","abstract_html":"Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as extremely cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that general goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas general goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hepler, Justin"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Albarracin, Dolores"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-08-20T17:57:19Z","date_published":"2010-08-20T17:57:19Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z","subjects":["Action","delay discounting","go/no-go","impulsivity","inaction","self-control"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2010 Justin J. Helpler"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16770","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Albarracin, Dolores"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hepler, Justin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-08-20T17:57:19Z","2010-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Action","delay discounting","go/no-go","impulsivity","inaction","self-control"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2010 Justin J. Helpler"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16770"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as extremely cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that general goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas general goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-07-12T16:29:32Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 hepler_justin.docx: 71678 bytes, checksum: aecee22f86f2c2390a940c828784e40f (MD5) hepler_justin.pdf: 167523 bytes, checksum: 2d6922a13341f01fe0ab03b102b028ea (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-20T17:57:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 hepler_justin.docx: 71678 bytes, checksum: aecee22f86f2c2390a940c828784e40f (MD5) hepler_justin.pdf: 167523 bytes, checksum: 2d6922a13341f01fe0ab03b102b028ea (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: e33d2d031a9952f18e5e811b3bb49b1e (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Albarracin, Dolores"],"dc:creator":["Hepler, Justin"],"dc:date":["2010-08-20T17:57:19Z","2010-08"],"dc:description":["Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as extremely cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words “condom” and “sex”. The results demonstrate that general goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas general goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-07-12T16:29:32Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 hepler_justin.docx: 71678 bytes, checksum: aecee22f86f2c2390a940c828784e40f (MD5) hepler_justin.pdf: 167523 bytes, checksum: 2d6922a13341f01fe0ab03b102b028ea (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-20T17:57:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 hepler_justin.docx: 71678 bytes, checksum: aecee22f86f2c2390a940c828784e40f (MD5) hepler_justin.pdf: 167523 bytes, checksum: 2d6922a13341f01fe0ab03b102b028ea (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: e33d2d031a9952f18e5e811b3bb49b1e (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16770"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2010 Justin J. Helpler"],"dc:subject":["Action","delay discounting","go/no-go","impulsivity","inaction","self-control"],"dc:title":["Being active and impulsive: the role of goals for action and inaction in self-control"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z"}