{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16708"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16708","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Reading Grimmelshausen's Simplicissimus as a political treatise between Hobbes and Locke","abstract":"This is a study of the political argumentation in the German Baroque writer Hans Jacob Christoph von Grimmelshausen’s picaresque novel Der abenteuerliche Simplicissimus Teutsch (1668). This thesis argues that the novel contains the three-part political argument found in the contemporary political treatises of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan (1651) and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689). The three-part argument asks what is the state of nature, what is the natural man, and what is the just political system that emerges from these definitions. Simplicissimus demonstrates political argumentation that refutes Hobbes’ defense of absolutism and anticipates Locke’s liberal political philosophy, while championing the moral hermit’s life above all political systems. The substantial political argumentation in the novel is presented as a series of distopian and utopian worldviews encountered by the protagonist. This thesis also presents a new interpretation both of the novel’s structure and of the novel’s frontispiece in light of the political reasoning in the work.","abstract_html":"This is a study of the political argumentation in the German Baroque writer Hans Jacob Christoph von Grimmelshausen’s picaresque novel Der abenteuerliche Simplicissimus Teutsch (1668). This thesis argues that the novel contains the three-part political argument found in the contemporary political treatises of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan (1651) and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689). The three-part argument asks what is the state of nature, what is the natural man, and what is the just political system that emerges from these definitions. Simplicissimus demonstrates political argumentation that refutes Hobbes’ defense of absolutism and anticipates Locke’s liberal political philosophy, while championing the moral hermit’s life above all political systems. The substantial political argumentation in the novel is presented as a series of distopian and utopian worldviews encountered by the protagonist. This thesis also presents a new interpretation both of the novel’s structure and of the novel’s frontispiece in light of the political reasoning in the work.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hollender, Kurt N."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"German","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wade, Mara R."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-08-20T17:55:34Z","date_published":"2010-08-20T17:55:34Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z","subjects":["Gimmelshausen","Simplicissimus","Political Science","Political Treatise","Hobbes","Locke","Absolutism"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2010 Kurt Hollender"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16708","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wade, Mara R."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hollender, Kurt N."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-08-20T17:55:34Z","2010-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["German"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Gimmelshausen","Simplicissimus","Political Science","Political Treatise","Hobbes","Locke","Absolutism"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2010 Kurt Hollender"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16708"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This is a study of the political argumentation in the German Baroque writer Hans Jacob Christoph von Grimmelshausen’s picaresque novel Der abenteuerliche Simplicissimus Teutsch (1668). This thesis argues that the novel contains the three-part political argument found in the contemporary political treatises of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan (1651) and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689). The three-part argument asks what is the state of nature, what is the natural man, and what is the just political system that emerges from these definitions. Simplicissimus demonstrates political argumentation that refutes Hobbes’ defense of absolutism and anticipates Locke’s liberal political philosophy, while championing the moral hermit’s life above all political systems. The substantial political argumentation in the novel is presented as a series of distopian and utopian worldviews encountered by the protagonist. This thesis also presents a new interpretation both of the novel’s structure and of the novel’s frontispiece in light of the political reasoning in the work.","Item withdrawn by Rebecca Bryant (rabryant@illinois.edu) on 2010-07-14T20:05:39Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 MA Thesis- Bridging Hobbes and Locke, with Chap III, IV, and V, SpellCheck (06-29-10).doc: 8814592 bytes, checksum: 4c852f79b290c74b57d569c5b0519e3a (MD5) Holldender_Kurt.pdf: 963516 bytes, checksum: a7adb46ff2b8a2eeab1e046cf294a643 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-20T17:55:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 Holldender_Kurt.pdf: 963516 bytes, checksum: a7adb46ff2b8a2eeab1e046cf294a643 (MD5) MA Thesis- Bridging Hobbes and Locke, with Chap III, IV, and V, SpellCheck (06-29-10).doc: 8814592 bytes, checksum: 4c852f79b290c74b57d569c5b0519e3a (MD5) Hollender_Kurt.pdf: 963516 bytes, checksum: a7adb46ff2b8a2eeab1e046cf294a643 (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 22c73489526b18026048a74d9730b665 (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Reading Grimmelshausen's Simplicissimus as a political treatise between Hobbes and Locke"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wade, Mara R."],"dc:creator":["Hollender, Kurt N."],"dc:date":["2010-08-20T17:55:34Z","2010-08"],"dc:description":["This is a study of the political argumentation in the German Baroque writer Hans Jacob Christoph von Grimmelshausen’s picaresque novel Der abenteuerliche Simplicissimus Teutsch (1668). This thesis argues that the novel contains the three-part political argument found in the contemporary political treatises of Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan (1651) and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689). The three-part argument asks what is the state of nature, what is the natural man, and what is the just political system that emerges from these definitions. Simplicissimus demonstrates political argumentation that refutes Hobbes’ defense of absolutism and anticipates Locke’s liberal political philosophy, while championing the moral hermit’s life above all political systems. The substantial political argumentation in the novel is presented as a series of distopian and utopian worldviews encountered by the protagonist. This thesis also presents a new interpretation both of the novel’s structure and of the novel’s frontispiece in light of the political reasoning in the work.","Item withdrawn by Rebecca Bryant (rabryant@illinois.edu) on 2010-07-14T20:05:39Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 MA Thesis- Bridging Hobbes and Locke, with Chap III, IV, and V, SpellCheck (06-29-10).doc: 8814592 bytes, checksum: 4c852f79b290c74b57d569c5b0519e3a (MD5) Holldender_Kurt.pdf: 963516 bytes, checksum: a7adb46ff2b8a2eeab1e046cf294a643 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-20T17:55:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 Holldender_Kurt.pdf: 963516 bytes, checksum: a7adb46ff2b8a2eeab1e046cf294a643 (MD5) MA Thesis- Bridging Hobbes and Locke, with Chap III, IV, and V, SpellCheck (06-29-10).doc: 8814592 bytes, checksum: 4c852f79b290c74b57d569c5b0519e3a (MD5) Hollender_Kurt.pdf: 963516 bytes, checksum: a7adb46ff2b8a2eeab1e046cf294a643 (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 22c73489526b18026048a74d9730b665 (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16708"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2010 Kurt Hollender"],"dc:subject":["Gimmelshausen","Simplicissimus","Political Science","Political Treatise","Hobbes","Locke","Absolutism"],"dc:title":["Reading Grimmelshausen's Simplicissimus as a political treatise between Hobbes and Locke"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["German"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z"}