{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16230"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16230","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The participatory potential of early cinema: a reexamination of early projected films","abstract":"This paper examines the formal qualities and historic context of three early films produced for the Edison Manufacturing Company by James White and Frederick Blechynden in 1897 titled Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1. It argues that the standard readings of early films posited by Tom Gunning and Charles Musser do not fully account for the self-reflexive materiality of the actualities under consideration. Working through Gunning and Musser’s debate with Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1 in mind, I argue for an alternative reading of early film that understands the participatory potentials of cinema.","abstract_html":"This paper examines the formal qualities and historic context of three early films produced for the Edison Manufacturing Company by James White and Frederick Blechynden in 1897 titled Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1. It argues that the standard readings of early films posited by Tom Gunning and Charles Musser do not fully account for the self-reflexive materiality of the actualities under consideration. Working through Gunning and Musser’s debate with Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1 in mind, I argue for an alternative reading of early film that understands the participatory potentials of cinema.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Daniel, Jessica A."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Art History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Greenhill, Jennifer A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-05-19T18:41:24Z","date_published":"2010-05-19T18:41:24Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z","subjects":["Early film","actualities","Edison Manufacturing Company","Participatory art"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright Jessica A. Daniel"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16230","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Greenhill, Jennifer A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Daniel, Jessica A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-05-19T18:41:24Z","2010-5"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Art History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Early film","actualities","Edison Manufacturing Company","Participatory art"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright Jessica A. Daniel"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16230"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This paper examines the formal qualities and historic context of three early films produced for the Edison Manufacturing Company by James White and Frederick Blechynden in 1897 titled Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1. It argues that the standard readings of early films posited by Tom Gunning and Charles Musser do not fully account for the self-reflexive materiality of the actualities under consideration. Working through Gunning and Musser’s debate with Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1 in mind, I argue for an alternative reading of early film that understands the participatory potentials of cinema.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-04-28T18:59:47Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Daniel_Jessica.doc: 3687936 bytes, checksum: e773428f8a0f8128f5c3b8f8c4133203 (MD5) Daniel_Jessica.pdf: 5661091 bytes, checksum: c2258059a3cfb218f66e8cbe1d119139 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-05-19T18:41:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Daniel_Jessica.doc: 3687936 bytes, checksum: e773428f8a0f8128f5c3b8f8c4133203 (MD5) Daniel_Jessica.pdf: 5661091 bytes, checksum: c2258059a3cfb218f66e8cbe1d119139 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 98e8a2c1fb00200afd6ffb958808ef5b (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The participatory potential of early cinema: a reexamination of early projected films"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Greenhill, Jennifer A."],"dc:creator":["Daniel, Jessica A."],"dc:date":["2010-05-19T18:41:24Z","2010-5"],"dc:description":["This paper examines the formal qualities and historic context of three early films produced for the Edison Manufacturing Company by James White and Frederick Blechynden in 1897 titled Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1. It argues that the standard readings of early films posited by Tom Gunning and Charles Musser do not fully account for the self-reflexive materiality of the actualities under consideration. Working through Gunning and Musser’s debate with Lurline Baths, Sutro Baths, and Sutro Baths, No. 1 in mind, I argue for an alternative reading of early film that understands the participatory potentials of cinema.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-04-28T18:59:47Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Daniel_Jessica.doc: 3687936 bytes, checksum: e773428f8a0f8128f5c3b8f8c4133203 (MD5) Daniel_Jessica.pdf: 5661091 bytes, checksum: c2258059a3cfb218f66e8cbe1d119139 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-05-19T18:41:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Daniel_Jessica.doc: 3687936 bytes, checksum: e773428f8a0f8128f5c3b8f8c4133203 (MD5) Daniel_Jessica.pdf: 5661091 bytes, checksum: c2258059a3cfb218f66e8cbe1d119139 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 98e8a2c1fb00200afd6ffb958808ef5b (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16230"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright Jessica A. Daniel"],"dc:subject":["Early film","actualities","Edison Manufacturing Company","Participatory art"],"dc:title":["The participatory potential of early cinema: a reexamination of early projected films"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Art History"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z"}