{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16217"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16217","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: evidence from the test expectancy method","abstract":"Three experiments demonstrated undergraduate participants’ abilities to adaptively and qualitatively accommodate their encoding strategies to the demands of an upcoming test as they gained experience with the test format. Stimuli were lists of word pairs. Experiment 1 induced test expectancy of either cued recall (of targets given cues) or free recall (of targets only) across four study-test cycles of the same test format, then presented participants with a final critical cycle featuring either the expected or the unexpected test format. For final tests of both cued and free recall, participants who had expected that test format outperformed those who had not. This disordinal interaction pattern demonstrated not mere differences in effort based on anticipated test difficulty, but rather qualitative and appropriate differences in encoding strategies based on expected task demands. The specific ways in which strategies shifted were revealed by final associative and item recognition performance and by self-report data. Participants also came to appropriately modulate metacognitive monitoring (Experiment 2) and study-time allocation (Experiment 3) across study-test cycles. Encoding strategies used for cued versus free recall were characterized and evaluated, and an account was given to reconcile inconsistent prior findings from test expectancy studies.","abstract_html":"Three experiments demonstrated undergraduate participants’ abilities to adaptively and qualitatively accommodate their encoding strategies to the demands of an upcoming test as they gained experience with the test format. Stimuli were lists of word pairs. Experiment 1 induced test expectancy of either cued recall (of targets given cues) or free recall (of targets only) across four study-test cycles of the same test format, then presented participants with a final critical cycle featuring either the expected or the unexpected test format. For final tests of both cued and free recall, participants who had expected that test format outperformed those who had not. This disordinal interaction pattern demonstrated not mere differences in effort based on anticipated test difficulty, but rather qualitative and appropriate differences in encoding strategies based on expected task demands. The specific ways in which strategies shifted were revealed by final associative and item recognition performance and by self-report data. Participants also came to appropriately modulate metacognitive monitoring (Experiment 2) and study-time allocation (Experiment 3) across study-test cycles. Encoding strategies used for cued versus free recall were characterized and evaluated, and an account was given to reconcile inconsistent prior findings from test expectancy studies.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Finley, Jason R."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Benjamin, Aaron S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-05-19T18:40:55Z","date_published":"2010-05-19T18:40:55Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z","subjects":["metamemory","encoding strategy","study-time allocation","metacognition","self-regulated learning","recall","memory"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2010 Jason R. Finley"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16217","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Benjamin, Aaron S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Finley, Jason R."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-05-19T18:40:55Z","2010-5"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["metamemory","encoding strategy","study-time allocation","metacognition","self-regulated learning","recall","memory"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2010 Jason R. Finley"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16217"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Three experiments demonstrated undergraduate participants’ abilities to adaptively and qualitatively accommodate their encoding strategies to the demands of an upcoming test as they gained experience with the test format. Stimuli were lists of word pairs. Experiment 1 induced test expectancy of either cued recall (of targets given cues) or free recall (of targets only) across four study-test cycles of the same test format, then presented participants with a final critical cycle featuring either the expected or the unexpected test format. For final tests of both cued and free recall, participants who had expected that test format outperformed those who had not. This disordinal interaction pattern demonstrated not mere differences in effort based on anticipated test difficulty, but rather qualitative and appropriate differences in encoding strategies based on expected task demands. The specific ways in which strategies shifted were revealed by final associative and item recognition performance and by self-report data. Participants also came to appropriately modulate metacognitive monitoring (Experiment 2) and study-time allocation (Experiment 3) across study-test cycles. Encoding strategies used for cued versus free recall were characterized and evaluated, and an account was given to reconcile inconsistent prior findings from test expectancy studies.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-04-08T17:59:17Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 JasonRFinley_MastersThesis_4-7-10.doc: 7175680 bytes, checksum: 89451b50e56c3c33267d1f2de43b9b5f (MD5) Finley_Jason.pdf: 6314040 bytes, checksum: 7f017086384bbb0c4480273ebe6a0666 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-05-19T18:40:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 Finley_Jason.pdf: 6314040 bytes, checksum: 7f017086384bbb0c4480273ebe6a0666 (MD5) JasonRFinley_MastersThesis_4-8-10.doc: 7175168 bytes, checksum: 2c7c1a902ae5f9eafe3e99e9a4e675ba (MD5) 1_Finley_Jason.pdf: 6358845 bytes, checksum: d6050cc5844e802f3cb2aedf7608cbf7 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: f11dcc2da5c8bd2e8032e1e352b55e2b (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: evidence from the test expectancy method"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Benjamin, Aaron S."],"dc:creator":["Finley, Jason R."],"dc:date":["2010-05-19T18:40:55Z","2010-5"],"dc:description":["Three experiments demonstrated undergraduate participants’ abilities to adaptively and qualitatively accommodate their encoding strategies to the demands of an upcoming test as they gained experience with the test format. Stimuli were lists of word pairs. Experiment 1 induced test expectancy of either cued recall (of targets given cues) or free recall (of targets only) across four study-test cycles of the same test format, then presented participants with a final critical cycle featuring either the expected or the unexpected test format. For final tests of both cued and free recall, participants who had expected that test format outperformed those who had not. This disordinal interaction pattern demonstrated not mere differences in effort based on anticipated test difficulty, but rather qualitative and appropriate differences in encoding strategies based on expected task demands. The specific ways in which strategies shifted were revealed by final associative and item recognition performance and by self-report data. Participants also came to appropriately modulate metacognitive monitoring (Experiment 2) and study-time allocation (Experiment 3) across study-test cycles. Encoding strategies used for cued versus free recall were characterized and evaluated, and an account was given to reconcile inconsistent prior findings from test expectancy studies.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-04-08T17:59:17Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 JasonRFinley_MastersThesis_4-7-10.doc: 7175680 bytes, checksum: 89451b50e56c3c33267d1f2de43b9b5f (MD5) Finley_Jason.pdf: 6314040 bytes, checksum: 7f017086384bbb0c4480273ebe6a0666 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-05-19T18:40:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 Finley_Jason.pdf: 6314040 bytes, checksum: 7f017086384bbb0c4480273ebe6a0666 (MD5) JasonRFinley_MastersThesis_4-8-10.doc: 7175168 bytes, checksum: 2c7c1a902ae5f9eafe3e99e9a4e675ba (MD5) 1_Finley_Jason.pdf: 6358845 bytes, checksum: d6050cc5844e802f3cb2aedf7608cbf7 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: f11dcc2da5c8bd2e8032e1e352b55e2b (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16217"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2010 Jason R. Finley"],"dc:subject":["metamemory","encoding strategy","study-time allocation","metacognition","self-regulated learning","recall","memory"],"dc:title":["Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: evidence from the test expectancy method"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z"}