{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16098"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/16098","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"An integrated multimodal intervention approach to support","abstract":"Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is often viewed as a “last resort” for children with severe speech sound impairments, with AAC consideration only occurring after years of failed traditional speech therapy. Two main reasons this occurs is because (a) parents view AAC as “giving up” on speech, and (b) parents and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often believe that implementing AAC will negatively affect natural speech development. These views have consequently led SLPs to dichotomize intervention for these children; either work on natural speech or implement AAC. Recent research has suggested this may not have to be a choice SLPs have to make. This study’s purpose was to examine the effects of an integrated multimodal intervention designed to increase the quantity and quality of natural speech production in children who are multimodal communicators due to severe speech sound impairment. A hybrid research design was used to determine the treatment’s effectiveness, including single-subject design methodology and qualitative methodology. Three children served as participants, with each child participating in a series of baseline and intervention sessions. The data obtained from the participants suggested the intervention had positive effects on their speech production abilities. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.","abstract_html":"Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is often viewed as a “last resort” for children with severe speech sound impairments, with AAC consideration only occurring after years of failed traditional speech therapy. Two main reasons this occurs is because (a) parents view AAC as “giving up” on speech, and (b) parents and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often believe that implementing AAC will negatively affect natural speech development. These views have consequently led SLPs to dichotomize intervention for these children; either work on natural speech or implement AAC. Recent research has suggested this may not have to be a choice SLPs have to make. This study’s purpose was to examine the effects of an integrated multimodal intervention designed to increase the quantity and quality of natural speech production in children who are multimodal communicators due to severe speech sound impairment. A hybrid research design was used to determine the treatment’s effectiveness, including single-subject design methodology and qualitative methodology. Three children served as participants, with each child participating in a series of baseline and intervention sessions. The data obtained from the participants suggested the intervention had positive effects on their speech production abilities. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["King, Amie M."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Speech & Hearing Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hengst, Julie A.","DeThorne, Laura S.","Halle, James W.","Johnson, Cynthia J.","Duff, Melissa C."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-05-19T18:34:47Z","date_published":"2010-05-19T18:34:47Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z","subjects":["augmentative and alternative communication","severe speech impairment","childhood apraxia of speech","integrated intervention","treatment","single subject methods"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2010 Amie M. King"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16098","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hengst, Julie A.","DeThorne, Laura S.","Halle, James W.","Johnson, Cynthia J.","Duff, Melissa C."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["King, Amie M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-05-19T18:34:47Z","2010-5"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Speech & Hearing Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["augmentative and alternative communication","severe speech impairment","childhood apraxia of speech","integrated intervention","treatment","single subject methods"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2010 Amie M. King"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16098"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is often viewed as a “last resort” for children with severe speech sound impairments, with AAC consideration only occurring after years of failed traditional speech therapy. Two main reasons this occurs is because (a) parents view AAC as “giving up” on speech, and (b) parents and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often believe that implementing AAC will negatively affect natural speech development. These views have consequently led SLPs to dichotomize intervention for these children; either work on natural speech or implement AAC. Recent research has suggested this may not have to be a choice SLPs have to make. This study’s purpose was to examine the effects of an integrated multimodal intervention designed to increase the quantity and quality of natural speech production in children who are multimodal communicators due to severe speech sound impairment. A hybrid research design was used to determine the treatment’s effectiveness, including single-subject design methodology and qualitative methodology. Three children served as participants, with each child participating in a series of baseline and intervention sessions. The data obtained from the participants suggested the intervention had positive effects on their speech production abilities. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-04-21T13:18:15Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 King_Amie.pdf: 790033 bytes, checksum: 971f5ce74ef536eab6e7a913b6d45895 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-05-19T18:34:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 King_Amie.pdf: 790033 bytes, checksum: 971f5ce74ef536eab6e7a913b6d45895 (MD5) license.txt: 4058 bytes, checksum: a31595b4f907c171200e0a568bcf765d (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["An integrated multimodal intervention approach to support"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hengst, Julie A.","DeThorne, Laura S.","Halle, James W.","Johnson, Cynthia J.","Duff, Melissa C."],"dc:creator":["King, Amie M."],"dc:date":["2010-05-19T18:34:47Z","2010-5"],"dc:description":["Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is often viewed as a “last resort” for children with severe speech sound impairments, with AAC consideration only occurring after years of failed traditional speech therapy. Two main reasons this occurs is because (a) parents view AAC as “giving up” on speech, and (b) parents and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often believe that implementing AAC will negatively affect natural speech development. These views have consequently led SLPs to dichotomize intervention for these children; either work on natural speech or implement AAC. Recent research has suggested this may not have to be a choice SLPs have to make. This study’s purpose was to examine the effects of an integrated multimodal intervention designed to increase the quantity and quality of natural speech production in children who are multimodal communicators due to severe speech sound impairment. A hybrid research design was used to determine the treatment’s effectiveness, including single-subject design methodology and qualitative methodology. Three children served as participants, with each child participating in a series of baseline and intervention sessions. The data obtained from the participants suggested the intervention had positive effects on their speech production abilities. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-04-21T13:18:15Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 King_Amie.pdf: 790033 bytes, checksum: 971f5ce74ef536eab6e7a913b6d45895 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-05-19T18:34:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 King_Amie.pdf: 790033 bytes, checksum: 971f5ce74ef536eab6e7a913b6d45895 (MD5) license.txt: 4058 bytes, checksum: a31595b4f907c171200e0a568bcf765d (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16098"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2010 Amie M. King"],"dc:subject":["augmentative and alternative communication","severe speech impairment","childhood apraxia of speech","integrated intervention","treatment","single subject methods"],"dc:title":["An integrated multimodal intervention approach to support"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Speech & Hearing Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z"}