{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/14757"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/14757","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Thai higher education reform: a new funding framework","abstract":"This study examines the new funding framework for Thai higher education under the autonomous university system. The study also explores the effects of this new funding framework on university faculty, especially with respect to institutional income generation. The research is employed a mixed method approach involving quantitative archival data and qualitative interviews. Six Thai university faculty from three different universities were interviewed using open-ended interviews. The archival data such as legislations, reports, and recommendation documents were collected and analyzed. The research findings reveal that the new framework of higher education funding is comprised of four major elements: performance-based funding mechanism, resource mobilization for higher education, institutional external income generation, and shifting greater funding to demand side (students and parents) through income contingency loans. The research findings also disclose that the new funding framework for higher education has effects on academic work time and effort of university faculty: they must to teach more students while at the same time they are compelled to focus much more on research and publications. In interviews, university faculty emphasize a discrepancy: research performance of faculty is enhanced whereas the quality of students is viewed to decline. The study raises four issues: equity assurance; cultural change of public’s giving to education; the pressure of resource allocation over available time for teaching, and leadership issues. Recommendations are made for further development of Thai higher education funding: developing regulations to assure financial aid or loan for needy students; creating a culture of giving to education; utilizing graduate assistance; and developing leadership program. In conclusion, the study provides suggestions for future research.","abstract_html":"This study examines the new funding framework for Thai higher education under the autonomous university system. The study also explores the effects of this new funding framework on university faculty, especially with respect to institutional income generation. The research is employed a mixed method approach involving quantitative archival data and qualitative interviews. Six Thai university faculty from three different universities were interviewed using open-ended interviews. The archival data such as legislations, reports, and recommendation documents were collected and analyzed. The research findings reveal that the new framework of higher education funding is comprised of four major elements: performance-based funding mechanism, resource mobilization for higher education, institutional external income generation, and shifting greater funding to demand side (students and parents) through income contingency loans. The research findings also disclose that the new funding framework for higher education has effects on academic work time and effort of university faculty: they must to teach more students while at the same time they are compelled to focus much more on research and publications. In interviews, university faculty emphasize a discrepancy: research performance of faculty is enhanced whereas the quality of students is viewed to decline. The study raises four issues: equity assurance; cultural change of public’s giving to education; the pressure of resource allocation over available time for teaching, and leadership issues. Recommendations are made for further development of Thai higher education funding: developing regulations to assure financial aid or loan for needy students; creating a culture of giving to education; utilizing graduate assistance; and developing leadership program. In conclusion, the study provides suggestions for future research.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Saenghong, Nannaphat"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Educational Policy Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Anderson, James D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-01-06T17:50:04Z","date_published":"2010-01-06T17:50:04Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z","subjects":["Higher Education Reform","Higher Education Funding","University Faculty"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["© 2009 Nannaphat Saenghong"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14757","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Anderson, James D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Saenghong, Nannaphat"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-01-06T17:50:04Z","2012-01-07T11:00:14Z","2009-12"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Policy Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Higher Education Reform","Higher Education Funding","University Faculty"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© 2009 Nannaphat Saenghong"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14757"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This study examines the new funding framework for Thai higher education under the autonomous university system. The study also explores the effects of this new funding framework on university faculty, especially with respect to institutional income generation. The research is employed a mixed method approach involving quantitative archival data and qualitative interviews. Six Thai university faculty from three different universities were interviewed using open-ended interviews. The archival data such as legislations, reports, and recommendation documents were collected and analyzed. The research findings reveal that the new framework of higher education funding is comprised of four major elements: performance-based funding mechanism, resource mobilization for higher education, institutional external income generation, and shifting greater funding to demand side (students and parents) through income contingency loans. The research findings also disclose that the new funding framework for higher education has effects on academic work time and effort of university faculty: they must to teach more students while at the same time they are compelled to focus much more on research and publications. In interviews, university faculty emphasize a discrepancy: research performance of faculty is enhanced whereas the quality of students is viewed to decline. The study raises four issues: equity assurance; cultural change of public’s giving to education; the pressure of resource allocation over available time for teaching, and leadership issues. Recommendations are made for further development of Thai higher education funding: developing regulations to assure financial aid or loan for needy students; creating a culture of giving to education; utilizing graduate assistance; and developing leadership program. In conclusion, the study provides suggestions for future research.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2009-11-30T18:06:58Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1393786 bytes, checksum: 8769947b5c0882379604d921e78d02d2 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.doc: 624640 bytes, checksum: 69ca279021bc0143f084eb8344e3a105 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-01-06T17:50:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 6 license.txt: 4069 bytes, checksum: 8d4a1dabb723c0d7c4b88622c4c34481 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.doc: 626176 bytes, checksum: cfccb644a462432dde88a3ad77d0c9f2 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) 1_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1393786 bytes, checksum: 8769947b5c0882379604d921e78d02d2 (MD5) 2_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368292 bytes, checksum: 932d7e2cd596dc1fe89b6018c19b29e5 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2010-01-06T17:50:31Z Item is restricted until 2012-01-06T17:50:31Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-01-07T11:00:14Z Item was in collections: College of Education Dissertations and Theses (ID: 434) University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) No. of bitstreams: 7 2_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf.txt: 265541 bytes, checksum: e9aad306f101551ead08005a40091ac3 (MD5) license.txt: 4069 bytes, checksum: 8d4a1dabb723c0d7c4b88622c4c34481 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.doc: 626176 bytes, checksum: cfccb644a462432dde88a3ad77d0c9f2 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) 1_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1393786 bytes, checksum: 8769947b5c0882379604d921e78d02d2 (MD5) 2_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368292 bytes, checksum: 932d7e2cd596dc1fe89b6018c19b29e5 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-01-07T11:00:14Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Thai higher education reform: a new funding framework"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Anderson, James D."],"dc:creator":["Saenghong, Nannaphat"],"dc:date":["2010-01-06T17:50:04Z","2012-01-07T11:00:14Z","2009-12"],"dc:description":["This study examines the new funding framework for Thai higher education under the autonomous university system. The study also explores the effects of this new funding framework on university faculty, especially with respect to institutional income generation. The research is employed a mixed method approach involving quantitative archival data and qualitative interviews. Six Thai university faculty from three different universities were interviewed using open-ended interviews. The archival data such as legislations, reports, and recommendation documents were collected and analyzed. The research findings reveal that the new framework of higher education funding is comprised of four major elements: performance-based funding mechanism, resource mobilization for higher education, institutional external income generation, and shifting greater funding to demand side (students and parents) through income contingency loans. The research findings also disclose that the new funding framework for higher education has effects on academic work time and effort of university faculty: they must to teach more students while at the same time they are compelled to focus much more on research and publications. In interviews, university faculty emphasize a discrepancy: research performance of faculty is enhanced whereas the quality of students is viewed to decline. The study raises four issues: equity assurance; cultural change of public’s giving to education; the pressure of resource allocation over available time for teaching, and leadership issues. Recommendations are made for further development of Thai higher education funding: developing regulations to assure financial aid or loan for needy students; creating a culture of giving to education; utilizing graduate assistance; and developing leadership program. In conclusion, the study provides suggestions for future research.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2009-11-30T18:06:58Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1393786 bytes, checksum: 8769947b5c0882379604d921e78d02d2 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.doc: 624640 bytes, checksum: 69ca279021bc0143f084eb8344e3a105 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-01-06T17:50:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 6 license.txt: 4069 bytes, checksum: 8d4a1dabb723c0d7c4b88622c4c34481 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.doc: 626176 bytes, checksum: cfccb644a462432dde88a3ad77d0c9f2 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) 1_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1393786 bytes, checksum: 8769947b5c0882379604d921e78d02d2 (MD5) 2_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368292 bytes, checksum: 932d7e2cd596dc1fe89b6018c19b29e5 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2010-01-06T17:50:31Z Item is restricted until 2012-01-06T17:50:31Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-01-07T11:00:14Z Item was in collections: College of Education Dissertations and Theses (ID: 434) University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) No. of bitstreams: 7 2_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf.txt: 265541 bytes, checksum: e9aad306f101551ead08005a40091ac3 (MD5) license.txt: 4069 bytes, checksum: 8d4a1dabb723c0d7c4b88622c4c34481 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.doc: 626176 bytes, checksum: cfccb644a462432dde88a3ad77d0c9f2 (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf.pdf: 1368166 bytes, checksum: 69a311c608062734d77674a25e0fcb8f (MD5) 1_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1393786 bytes, checksum: 8769947b5c0882379604d921e78d02d2 (MD5) 2_Saenghong_Nannaphat.pdf: 1368292 bytes, checksum: 932d7e2cd596dc1fe89b6018c19b29e5 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-01-07T11:00:14Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14757"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["© 2009 Nannaphat Saenghong"],"dc:subject":["Higher Education Reform","Higher Education Funding","University Faculty"],"dc:title":["Thai higher education reform: a new funding framework"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Policy Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:08Z"}