{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/14654"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/14654","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Comparative performance analysis of drives for induction motors","abstract":"The asynchronous polyphase induction motor has been the motor of choice in industrial settings for about the past half century because power electronics can be used to control its output behavior. Before that, the dc motor was widely used because of its easy speed and torque controllability. The two main reasons why this might be are its ruggedness and low cost. The induction motor is a rugged machine because it is brushless and has fewer internal parts that need maintenance or replacement. This makes it low cost in comparison to other motors, such as the dc motor. Because of these facts, the induction motor and drive system have been gaining market share in industry and even in alternative applications such as hybrid electric vehicles and electric vehicles. The subject of this thesis is to ascertain various control algorithms’ advantages and disadvantages and give recommendations for their use under certain conditions and in distinct applications. Four drives will be compared as fairly as possible by comparing their parameter sensitivities, dynamic responses, and steady-state errors. Different switching techniques are used to show that the motor drive is separate from the switching scheme; changing the switching scheme produces entirely different responses for each motor drive.","abstract_html":"The asynchronous polyphase induction motor has been the motor of choice in industrial settings for about the past half century because power electronics can be used to control its output behavior. Before that, the dc motor was widely used because of its easy speed and torque controllability. The two main reasons why this might be are its ruggedness and low cost. The induction motor is a rugged machine because it is brushless and has fewer internal parts that need maintenance or replacement. This makes it low cost in comparison to other motors, such as the dc motor. Because of these facts, the induction motor and drive system have been gaining market share in industry and even in alternative applications such as hybrid electric vehicles and electric vehicles. The subject of this thesis is to ascertain various control algorithms’ advantages and disadvantages and give recommendations for their use under certain conditions and in distinct applications. Four drives will be compared as fairly as possible by comparing their parameter sensitivities, dynamic responses, and steady-state errors. Different switching techniques are used to show that the motor drive is separate from the switching scheme; changing the switching scheme produces entirely different responses for each motor drive.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Friedl, Andrew P."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Electrical & Computer Engr","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Krein, Philip T."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-01-06T16:20:30Z","date_published":"2010-01-06T16:20:30Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:07Z","subjects":["Induction Motor Control","direct torque control","feedback linearization","indirect field-oriented control","vectorized volts-per-hertz","parameter sensitivity analysis","motor controller comparison"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2009 Andrew Friedl"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14654","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Krein, Philip T."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Friedl, Andrew P."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-01-06T16:20:30Z","2009-12"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Electrical & Computer Engr"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Induction Motor Control","direct torque control","feedback linearization","indirect field-oriented control","vectorized volts-per-hertz","parameter sensitivity analysis","motor controller comparison"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2009 Andrew Friedl"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14654"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The asynchronous polyphase induction motor has been the motor of choice in industrial settings for about the past half century because power electronics can be used to control its output behavior. Before that, the dc motor was widely used because of its easy speed and torque controllability. The two main reasons why this might be are its ruggedness and low cost. The induction motor is a rugged machine because it is brushless and has fewer internal parts that need maintenance or replacement. This makes it low cost in comparison to other motors, such as the dc motor. Because of these facts, the induction motor and drive system have been gaining market share in industry and even in alternative applications such as hybrid electric vehicles and electric vehicles. The subject of this thesis is to ascertain various control algorithms’ advantages and disadvantages and give recommendations for their use under certain conditions and in distinct applications. Four drives will be compared as fairly as possible by comparing their parameter sensitivities, dynamic responses, and steady-state errors. Different switching techniques are used to show that the motor drive is separate from the switching scheme; changing the switching scheme produces entirely different responses for each motor drive.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2009-12-08T18:21:38Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Friedl_Andrew.pdf: 2035413 bytes, checksum: 83ceab15811859ab579c7c2a414cf79d (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-01-06T16:20:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: bd6753286820365994c09d039abcb112 (MD5) Friedl_Andrew.pdf: 2035413 bytes, checksum: 83ceab15811859ab579c7c2a414cf79d (MD5) 1_Friedl_Andrew.pdf: 2035492 bytes, checksum: c32e36619b796241bd448da4bf0880ca (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparative performance analysis of drives for induction motors"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Krein, Philip T."],"dc:creator":["Friedl, Andrew P."],"dc:date":["2010-01-06T16:20:30Z","2009-12"],"dc:description":["The asynchronous polyphase induction motor has been the motor of choice in industrial settings for about the past half century because power electronics can be used to control its output behavior. Before that, the dc motor was widely used because of its easy speed and torque controllability. The two main reasons why this might be are its ruggedness and low cost. The induction motor is a rugged machine because it is brushless and has fewer internal parts that need maintenance or replacement. This makes it low cost in comparison to other motors, such as the dc motor. Because of these facts, the induction motor and drive system have been gaining market share in industry and even in alternative applications such as hybrid electric vehicles and electric vehicles. The subject of this thesis is to ascertain various control algorithms’ advantages and disadvantages and give recommendations for their use under certain conditions and in distinct applications. Four drives will be compared as fairly as possible by comparing their parameter sensitivities, dynamic responses, and steady-state errors. Different switching techniques are used to show that the motor drive is separate from the switching scheme; changing the switching scheme produces entirely different responses for each motor drive.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2009-12-08T18:21:38Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Friedl_Andrew.pdf: 2035413 bytes, checksum: 83ceab15811859ab579c7c2a414cf79d (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-01-06T16:20:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: bd6753286820365994c09d039abcb112 (MD5) Friedl_Andrew.pdf: 2035413 bytes, checksum: 83ceab15811859ab579c7c2a414cf79d (MD5) 1_Friedl_Andrew.pdf: 2035492 bytes, checksum: c32e36619b796241bd448da4bf0880ca (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14654"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2009 Andrew Friedl"],"dc:subject":["Induction Motor Control","direct torque control","feedback linearization","indirect field-oriented control","vectorized volts-per-hertz","parameter sensitivity analysis","motor controller comparison"],"dc:title":["Comparative performance analysis of drives for induction motors"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Electrical & Computer Engr"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:07Z"}