{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/132633"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/132633","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Educators and students in the age of artificial intelligence: A qualitative study of mathematics education in community colleges","abstract":"This qualitative phenomenological study investigated how community college mathematics instructors perceive the use and impact of AI tools on their instructional practices, and what the implications are for enhancing teaching effectiveness and delivery, alongside how students perceive the influence of these tools on their engagement, understanding of mathematical concepts, and overall learning outcomes, and what the implications are for student success in mathematics courses. Additionally, it explored how faculty and student perceptions of AI tool usage differ across synchronous and asynchronous learning environments at four U.S. colleges in Arizona, Illinois, and California, and what the implications are for modality-specific pedagogical strategies, guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and enriched by Teaching for Robust Understanding, Realistic Mathematics Education, Critical Mathematics Education, and Community of Inquiry frameworks. Data, collected in 2025 through 23 semi-structured Zoom interviews with faculty and 54 open-ended surveys with students, were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis in NVivo, involving a diverse sample of 23 faculty and 54 students. The study uncovered six faculty themes, including instructional efficiency, engagement, academic integrity concerns, institutional support, critical thinking/ethical issues, and modality-specific impacts, and six parallel student themes, such as engagement/efficiency, limited conceptual understanding, ethical use/dependency risks, social influences, access/equity challenges, and modality-specific impacts, revealing a complex interplay of benefits and challenges. AI tools enhanced grading and visualization, yet posed risks of over-reliance and widened equity gaps, notably for the 42.6% first-generation students in asynchronous settings where 82.6% of faculty and 75.9% of students were enrolled. The influence of California’s Assembly Bill 1705, which restricts remedial courses, highlighted AI and open educational resources as vital supports for transfer-level mathematics. These findings suggest exploratory pathways for faculty training, modality-specific policies, and equitable AI integration, contributing to the development of pedagogy and policy in community college mathematics education while inviting further research to validate these implications.","abstract_html":"This qualitative phenomenological study investigated how community college mathematics instructors perceive the use and impact of AI tools on their instructional practices, and what the implications are for enhancing teaching effectiveness and delivery, alongside how students perceive the influence of these tools on their engagement, understanding of mathematical concepts, and overall learning outcomes, and what the implications are for student success in mathematics courses. Additionally, it explored how faculty and student perceptions of AI tool usage differ across synchronous and asynchronous learning environments at four U.S. colleges in Arizona, Illinois, and California, and what the implications are for modality-specific pedagogical strategies, guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and enriched by Teaching for Robust Understanding, Realistic Mathematics Education, Critical Mathematics Education, and Community of Inquiry frameworks. Data, collected in 2025 through 23 semi-structured Zoom interviews with faculty and 54 open-ended surveys with students, were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis in NVivo, involving a diverse sample of 23 faculty and 54 students. The study uncovered six faculty themes, including instructional efficiency, engagement, academic integrity concerns, institutional support, critical thinking/ethical issues, and modality-specific impacts, and six parallel student themes, such as engagement/efficiency, limited conceptual understanding, ethical use/dependency risks, social influences, access/equity challenges, and modality-specific impacts, revealing a complex interplay of benefits and challenges. AI tools enhanced grading and visualization, yet posed risks of over-reliance and widened equity gaps, notably for the 42.6% first-generation students in asynchronous settings where 82.6% of faculty and 75.9% of students were enrolled. The influence of California’s Assembly Bill 1705, which restricts remedial courses, highlighted AI and open educational resources as vital supports for transfer-level mathematics. These findings suggest exploratory pathways for faculty training, modality-specific policies, and equitable AI integration, contributing to the development of pedagogy and policy in community college mathematics education while inviting further research to validate these implications.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Tran, Duy Q."],"institution":"University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ed.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Cope, William","Kalantzis, Mary","Magee, Liam","Bruno, Paul"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-12","date_published":"2025-12","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:07Z","subjects":["Artificial Intelligence in Education, Community College Mathematics, Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning, Technology Adoption, Pedagogical Strategies, Educational Equity, Academic Integrity, Qualitative Research"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["© 2025 Duy Q. Tran"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/132633","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Cope, William","Kalantzis, Mary","Magee, Liam","Bruno, Paul"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Tran, Duy Q."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2025-12","2025-10-29"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Artificial Intelligence in Education, Community College Mathematics, Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning, Technology Adoption, Pedagogical Strategies, Educational Equity, Academic Integrity, Qualitative Research"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© 2025 Duy Q. Tran"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/132633"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This qualitative phenomenological study investigated how community college mathematics instructors perceive the use and impact of AI tools on their instructional practices, and what the implications are for enhancing teaching effectiveness and delivery, alongside how students perceive the influence of these tools on their engagement, understanding of mathematical concepts, and overall learning outcomes, and what the implications are for student success in mathematics courses. Additionally, it explored how faculty and student perceptions of AI tool usage differ across synchronous and asynchronous learning environments at four U.S. colleges in Arizona, Illinois, and California, and what the implications are for modality-specific pedagogical strategies, guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and enriched by Teaching for Robust Understanding, Realistic Mathematics Education, Critical Mathematics Education, and Community of Inquiry frameworks. Data, collected in 2025 through 23 semi-structured Zoom interviews with faculty and 54 open-ended surveys with students, were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis in NVivo, involving a diverse sample of 23 faculty and 54 students. The study uncovered six faculty themes, including instructional efficiency, engagement, academic integrity concerns, institutional support, critical thinking/ethical issues, and modality-specific impacts, and six parallel student themes, such as engagement/efficiency, limited conceptual understanding, ethical use/dependency risks, social influences, access/equity challenges, and modality-specific impacts, revealing a complex interplay of benefits and challenges. AI tools enhanced grading and visualization, yet posed risks of over-reliance and widened equity gaps, notably for the 42.6% first-generation students in asynchronous settings where 82.6% of faculty and 75.9% of students were enrolled. The influence of California’s Assembly Bill 1705, which restricts remedial courses, highlighted AI and open educational resources as vital supports for transfer-level mathematics. These findings suggest exploratory pathways for faculty training, modality-specific policies, and equitable AI integration, contributing to the development of pedagogy and policy in community college mathematics education while inviting further research to validate these implications.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2027-12-01","The student, Duy Tran, accepted the attached license on 2025-10-27 at 18:39.","The student, Duy Tran, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2025-10-27 at 18:51.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2025-10-29 at 10:32.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #22835 on 2026-02-19 at 18:45:39"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Educators and students in the age of artificial intelligence: A qualitative study of mathematics education in community colleges"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Cope, William","Kalantzis, Mary","Magee, Liam","Bruno, Paul"],"dc:creator":["Tran, Duy Q."],"dc:date":["2025-12","2025-10-29"],"dc:description":["This qualitative phenomenological study investigated how community college mathematics instructors perceive the use and impact of AI tools on their instructional practices, and what the implications are for enhancing teaching effectiveness and delivery, alongside how students perceive the influence of these tools on their engagement, understanding of mathematical concepts, and overall learning outcomes, and what the implications are for student success in mathematics courses. Additionally, it explored how faculty and student perceptions of AI tool usage differ across synchronous and asynchronous learning environments at four U.S. colleges in Arizona, Illinois, and California, and what the implications are for modality-specific pedagogical strategies, guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and enriched by Teaching for Robust Understanding, Realistic Mathematics Education, Critical Mathematics Education, and Community of Inquiry frameworks. Data, collected in 2025 through 23 semi-structured Zoom interviews with faculty and 54 open-ended surveys with students, were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis in NVivo, involving a diverse sample of 23 faculty and 54 students. The study uncovered six faculty themes, including instructional efficiency, engagement, academic integrity concerns, institutional support, critical thinking/ethical issues, and modality-specific impacts, and six parallel student themes, such as engagement/efficiency, limited conceptual understanding, ethical use/dependency risks, social influences, access/equity challenges, and modality-specific impacts, revealing a complex interplay of benefits and challenges. AI tools enhanced grading and visualization, yet posed risks of over-reliance and widened equity gaps, notably for the 42.6% first-generation students in asynchronous settings where 82.6% of faculty and 75.9% of students were enrolled. The influence of California’s Assembly Bill 1705, which restricts remedial courses, highlighted AI and open educational resources as vital supports for transfer-level mathematics. These findings suggest exploratory pathways for faculty training, modality-specific policies, and equitable AI integration, contributing to the development of pedagogy and policy in community college mathematics education while inviting further research to validate these implications.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2027-12-01","The student, Duy Tran, accepted the attached license on 2025-10-27 at 18:39.","The student, Duy Tran, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2025-10-27 at 18:51.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2025-10-29 at 10:32.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #22835 on 2026-02-19 at 18:45:39"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/132633"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["© 2025 Duy Q. Tran"],"dc:subject":["Artificial Intelligence in Education, Community College Mathematics, Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning, Technology Adoption, Pedagogical Strategies, Educational Equity, Academic Integrity, Qualitative Research"],"dc:title":["Educators and students in the age of artificial intelligence: A qualitative study of mathematics education in community colleges"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:07Z"}