{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/129275"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/129275","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Making the grade: Labor, desert and integrity in assessment","abstract":"Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-10-19 without embargo terms","abstract_html":"Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-10-19 without embargo terms","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Smith, Bennett Lawton"],"institution":"University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Burbules, Nicholas C","Nelson, Jennifer L","Tanchuk, Nicolas J","Taylor, Rebecca M"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-05-05","date_published":"2025-05-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:04Z","subjects":["desert","artificial intelligence","academic integrity"],"languages":["en","eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2025 Bennett L. Smith"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129275","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Burbules, Nicholas C","Nelson, Jennifer L","Tanchuk, Nicolas J","Taylor, Rebecca M"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Smith, Bennett Lawton"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2025-05-05","2025-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["desert","artificial intelligence","academic integrity"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2025 Bennett L. Smith"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129275"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-10-19 without embargo terms","The student, Bennett Smith, accepted the attached license on 2025-04-29 at 08:20.","The student, Bennett Smith, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2025-04-29 at 08:28.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2025-05-05 at 10:46.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #22067 on 2025-10-19 at 18:11:13","As text-generating artificial intelligence tools grow in popularity, educators and educational institutions ask: how ought students use (or not) these tools, and why? This paper assesses the position taken by the International Baccalaureate Organization on these questions by using the organization’s relevant policy documents to assemble a set of analytical claims about the conceptual linkages underlying them. I suggest that the concept of “academic integrity,” when deployed to regulate the production of student work within the IB, draws implicitly or explicitly on at least three different conceptions of integrity. I identify each, compare their foundations, applications, and limits, and turn to focus on one in particular, which invokes moral desert. I contend that this conception is crucial to account for, at least within the specific policy context under review, because it is directly impacted by the way AI tools function in the production of academic work. Indeed, I show that these tools intervene in precisely the place that desert claims are rooted, and I draw implications for current and future policy responses."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Making the grade: Labor, desert and integrity in assessment"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Burbules, Nicholas C","Nelson, Jennifer L","Tanchuk, Nicolas J","Taylor, Rebecca M"],"dc:creator":["Smith, Bennett Lawton"],"dc:date":["2025-05-05","2025-05"],"dc:description":["Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-10-19 without embargo terms","The student, Bennett Smith, accepted the attached license on 2025-04-29 at 08:20.","The student, Bennett Smith, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2025-04-29 at 08:28.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2025-05-05 at 10:46.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #22067 on 2025-10-19 at 18:11:13","As text-generating artificial intelligence tools grow in popularity, educators and educational institutions ask: how ought students use (or not) these tools, and why? This paper assesses the position taken by the International Baccalaureate Organization on these questions by using the organization’s relevant policy documents to assemble a set of analytical claims about the conceptual linkages underlying them. I suggest that the concept of “academic integrity,” when deployed to regulate the production of student work within the IB, draws implicitly or explicitly on at least three different conceptions of integrity. I identify each, compare their foundations, applications, and limits, and turn to focus on one in particular, which invokes moral desert. I contend that this conception is crucial to account for, at least within the specific policy context under review, because it is directly impacted by the way AI tools function in the production of academic work. Indeed, I show that these tools intervene in precisely the place that desert claims are rooted, and I draw implications for current and future policy responses."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/129275"],"dc:language":["en","eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2025 Bennett L. Smith"],"dc:subject":["desert","artificial intelligence","academic integrity"],"dc:title":["Making the grade: Labor, desert and integrity in assessment"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:04Z"}