{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/127452"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/127452","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Small corners: Explorations of ethics and epistemic harms in forced disclosure research, advocacy, and legislation","abstract":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2026-12-01","abstract_html":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2026-12-01","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Erbe, Kimberly"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Taylor, Rebecca","Ginsburg, Rebecca","Davila, Liv","Flores, Osly"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-11-07","date_published":"2024-11-07","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:04Z","subjects":["Epistemic Harm","Forced Disclosure","Ethics"],"languages":["en","eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2024 Kimberly Erbe"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/127452","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Taylor, Rebecca","Ginsburg, Rebecca","Davila, Liv","Flores, Osly"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Erbe, Kimberly"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2024-11-07","2024-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Epistemic Harm","Forced Disclosure","Ethics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2024 Kimberly Erbe"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/127452"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2026-12-01","The student, Kimberly Erbe, accepted the attached license on 2024-11-07 at 11:56.","The student, Kimberly Erbe, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2024-11-07 at 12:02.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2024-11-07 at 14:23.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #21300 on 2025-03-28 at 14:53:46","Comprising three papers, this dissertation explores ethics and epistemic harms in the research, advocacy, and legislation related to inquiring about college applicants’ involvement with the criminal punishment system, a practice also known as forced disclosure. Each paper takes a different methodological approach to explore unique aspects of ethics and epistemic harm within these three arenas. The first paper considers the ethics of forced disclosure research by reflecting on a previous project which used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to examine forced disclosure practices at public universities in Illinois. The second paper uses a normative case study to examine the ways in which epistemic harm could potentially emerge in collaborative forced disclosure advocacy involving people with and without criminal convictions. The third paper explores epistemic harms emerging from the ways higher education and higher educational institutions were positioned within forced disclosure legislative debates in Illinois. Together, these papers consider ethical and epistemic tensions arising from research, advocacy, and legislation aimed at abolishing or restricting the practice of forced disclosure in higher education."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Small corners: Explorations of ethics and epistemic harms in forced disclosure research, advocacy, and legislation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Taylor, Rebecca","Ginsburg, Rebecca","Davila, Liv","Flores, Osly"],"dc:creator":["Erbe, Kimberly"],"dc:date":["2024-11-07","2024-12"],"dc:description":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2026-12-01","The student, Kimberly Erbe, accepted the attached license on 2024-11-07 at 11:56.","The student, Kimberly Erbe, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2024-11-07 at 12:02.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2024-11-07 at 14:23.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #21300 on 2025-03-28 at 14:53:46","Comprising three papers, this dissertation explores ethics and epistemic harms in the research, advocacy, and legislation related to inquiring about college applicants’ involvement with the criminal punishment system, a practice also known as forced disclosure. Each paper takes a different methodological approach to explore unique aspects of ethics and epistemic harm within these three arenas. The first paper considers the ethics of forced disclosure research by reflecting on a previous project which used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to examine forced disclosure practices at public universities in Illinois. The second paper uses a normative case study to examine the ways in which epistemic harm could potentially emerge in collaborative forced disclosure advocacy involving people with and without criminal convictions. The third paper explores epistemic harms emerging from the ways higher education and higher educational institutions were positioned within forced disclosure legislative debates in Illinois. Together, these papers consider ethical and epistemic tensions arising from research, advocacy, and legislation aimed at abolishing or restricting the practice of forced disclosure in higher education."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/127452"],"dc:language":["en","eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2024 Kimberly Erbe"],"dc:subject":["Epistemic Harm","Forced Disclosure","Ethics"],"dc:title":["Small corners: Explorations of ethics and epistemic harms in forced disclosure research, advocacy, and legislation"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:04Z"}