{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125936"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125936","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Text analysis of persuasive business writing: A sociolinguistic perspective","abstract":"A preliminary study has been undertaken to determine how cohesion and coherence could be evaluated in practical terms. The hypothesis being tested in this study is: positive relationships exist between perceived persuasiveness and the textual level as defined by cohesion and coherence. Thirty compositions of native and nonnative speakers of English were scored for perceived persuasiveness, cohesion, and organizational coherence. The results of this study are intended to further the research in text analysis. A current issue in sociolinguistics is the development of a model for discourse analysis and the practicality of implementing that model. Models posited by Halliday and Hasan (1976) and William Grabe (1985) identify the levels of representation as surface and deep, an essential aspect in evaluating either written or oral text. The problem arises, though, in how the model should be implemented. Halliday and Hasan offer specific examples for evaluating cohesion but guidance is not given for coherence, the ideational level, or the interpersonal level of their model. Grabe presents a comprehensive model but nothing is mentioned about the implementation of it. At the present time this area of research is receiving much emphasis, some of which should be given to the practicality of discourse analysis.","abstract_html":"A preliminary study has been undertaken to determine how cohesion and coherence could be evaluated in practical terms. The hypothesis being tested in this study is: positive relationships exist between perceived persuasiveness and the textual level as defined by cohesion and coherence. Thirty compositions of native and nonnative speakers of English were scored for perceived persuasiveness, cohesion, and organizational coherence. The results of this study are intended to further the research in text analysis. A current issue in sociolinguistics is the development of a model for discourse analysis and the practicality of implementing that model. Models posited by Halliday and Hasan (1976) and William Grabe (1985) identify the levels of representation as surface and deep, an essential aspect in evaluating either written or oral text. The problem arises, though, in how the model should be implemented. Halliday and Hasan offer specific examples for evaluating cohesion but guidance is not given for coherence, the ideational level, or the interpersonal level of their model. Grabe presents a comprehensive model but nothing is mentioned about the implementation of it. At the present time this area of research is receiving much emphasis, some of which should be given to the practicality of discourse analysis.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Yu, Ella Ozier"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Teaching English as a Second Language","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Aston, Katharine O."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1987,"date_issued":"1987","date_published":"1987","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z","subjects":["Teaching English as Second Language","Cohesion and coherence Perceived persuasiveness","Text analysis","Discourse analysis model"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright owned by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125936","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Aston, Katharine O."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Yu, Ella Ozier"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1987"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation/Thesis","text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teaching English as a Second Language"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Teaching English as Second Language","Cohesion and coherence Perceived persuasiveness","Text analysis","Discourse analysis model"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright owned by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125936"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["A preliminary study has been undertaken to determine how cohesion and coherence could be evaluated in practical terms. The hypothesis being tested in this study is: positive relationships exist between perceived persuasiveness and the textual level as defined by cohesion and coherence. Thirty compositions of native and nonnative speakers of English were scored for perceived persuasiveness, cohesion, and organizational coherence. The results of this study are intended to further the research in text analysis. A current issue in sociolinguistics is the development of a model for discourse analysis and the practicality of implementing that model. Models posited by Halliday and Hasan (1976) and William Grabe (1985) identify the levels of representation as surface and deep, an essential aspect in evaluating either written or oral text. The problem arises, though, in how the model should be implemented. Halliday and Hasan offer specific examples for evaluating cohesion but guidance is not given for coherence, the ideational level, or the interpersonal level of their model. Grabe presents a comprehensive model but nothing is mentioned about the implementation of it. At the present time this area of research is receiving much emphasis, some of which should be given to the practicality of discourse analysis."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Text analysis of persuasive business writing: A sociolinguistic perspective"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Aston, Katharine O."],"dc:creator":["Yu, Ella Ozier"],"dc:date":["1987"],"dc:description":["A preliminary study has been undertaken to determine how cohesion and coherence could be evaluated in practical terms. The hypothesis being tested in this study is: positive relationships exist between perceived persuasiveness and the textual level as defined by cohesion and coherence. Thirty compositions of native and nonnative speakers of English were scored for perceived persuasiveness, cohesion, and organizational coherence. The results of this study are intended to further the research in text analysis. A current issue in sociolinguistics is the development of a model for discourse analysis and the practicality of implementing that model. Models posited by Halliday and Hasan (1976) and William Grabe (1985) identify the levels of representation as surface and deep, an essential aspect in evaluating either written or oral text. The problem arises, though, in how the model should be implemented. Halliday and Hasan offer specific examples for evaluating cohesion but guidance is not given for coherence, the ideational level, or the interpersonal level of their model. Grabe presents a comprehensive model but nothing is mentioned about the implementation of it. At the present time this area of research is receiving much emphasis, some of which should be given to the practicality of discourse analysis."],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125936"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright owned by the author."],"dc:subject":["Teaching English as Second Language","Cohesion and coherence Perceived persuasiveness","Text analysis","Discourse analysis model"],"dc:title":["Text analysis of persuasive business writing: A sociolinguistic perspective"],"dc:type":["Dissertation/Thesis","text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teaching English as a Second Language"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z"}