{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125933"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125933","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Frame anaphora: The definite article in discourse","abstract":"The definite article is a problematic feature of language for many nonnative speakers of English. This study investigates one use of the definite article in the written discourse of native and nonnative speakers. This use, which I term frame anaphora, is illustrated in the following example: 'The disease is usually harmless, but the symptoms are dramatic. The use of the definite article presumes a shared knowledge that diseases have symptoms, a kind of shared generic knowledge which has been characterized using the notion of frame (Minsky, 1975; Fillmore, 1975, 1976; DuBois, 1980). A theory of frame anaphora, which is a modified version of Hawkins• (1978) theory of the definite article, is developed and used to analyze essays written by university students in response to a writing task assigned in rhetoric and English as a Second Language classes. The specific objectives of the analysis are to investigate how frame anaphora functions in discourse, what aspects of frame anaphora are problematic for nonnative speakers, and how native speakers' use of frame anaphora differs from that of nonnative speakers’. A subset of data written by Korean speakers is analyzed to determine if native language can account for the writers' errors in using frame anaphora. The data show that in addition to making syntactic errors, nonnative speakers have problems with two basic pragmatic aspects of frame anaphora: establishing a frame in discourse and explicitly indicating that a referent is locatable in that frame. The data written by Korean speakers show that in many cases there is a lack of identifiable interference from Korean, demonstrating that the complexity of the definite article itself often plays more of a role in the production of errors than interference from the native language. The data from native speakers show that frame anaphora can be used for the stylistic purpose of bringing the reader into the writer's perspective.","abstract_html":"The definite article is a problematic feature of language for many nonnative speakers of English. This study investigates one use of the definite article in the written discourse of native and nonnative speakers. This use, which I term frame anaphora, is illustrated in the following example: &#x27;The disease is usually harmless, but the symptoms are dramatic. The use of the definite article presumes a shared knowledge that diseases have symptoms, a kind of shared generic knowledge which has been characterized using the notion of frame (Minsky, 1975; Fillmore, 1975, 1976; DuBois, 1980). A theory of frame anaphora, which is a modified version of Hawkins• (1978) theory of the definite article, is developed and used to analyze essays written by university students in response to a writing task assigned in rhetoric and English as a Second Language classes. The specific objectives of the analysis are to investigate how frame anaphora functions in discourse, what aspects of frame anaphora are problematic for nonnative speakers, and how native speakers&#x27; use of frame anaphora differs from that of nonnative speakers’. A subset of data written by Korean speakers is analyzed to determine if native language can account for the writers&#x27; errors in using frame anaphora. The data show that in addition to making syntactic errors, nonnative speakers have problems with two basic pragmatic aspects of frame anaphora: establishing a frame in discourse and explicitly indicating that a referent is locatable in that frame. The data written by Korean speakers show that in many cases there is a lack of identifiable interference from Korean, demonstrating that the complexity of the definite article itself often plays more of a role in the production of errors than interference from the native language. The data from native speakers show that frame anaphora can be used for the stylistic purpose of bringing the reader into the writer&#x27;s perspective.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Yontz, Ruth Ann"],"institution":"Northwestern University","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Teaching English as a Second Language","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Moses, Rae","Gundlach, Robert"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1988,"date_issued":"1988","date_published":"1988","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z","subjects":["Teaching English as Second Language"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright owned by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125933","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Moses, Rae","Gundlach, Robert"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Yontz, Ruth Ann"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1988"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation/Thesis","text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teaching English as a Second Language"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Northwestern University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Teaching English as Second Language"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright owned by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125933"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The definite article is a problematic feature of language for many nonnative speakers of English. This study investigates one use of the definite article in the written discourse of native and nonnative speakers. This use, which I term frame anaphora, is illustrated in the following example: 'The disease is usually harmless, but the symptoms are dramatic. The use of the definite article presumes a shared knowledge that diseases have symptoms, a kind of shared generic knowledge which has been characterized using the notion of frame (Minsky, 1975; Fillmore, 1975, 1976; DuBois, 1980). A theory of frame anaphora, which is a modified version of Hawkins• (1978) theory of the definite article, is developed and used to analyze essays written by university students in response to a writing task assigned in rhetoric and English as a Second Language classes. The specific objectives of the analysis are to investigate how frame anaphora functions in discourse, what aspects of frame anaphora are problematic for nonnative speakers, and how native speakers' use of frame anaphora differs from that of nonnative speakers’. A subset of data written by Korean speakers is analyzed to determine if native language can account for the writers' errors in using frame anaphora. The data show that in addition to making syntactic errors, nonnative speakers have problems with two basic pragmatic aspects of frame anaphora: establishing a frame in discourse and explicitly indicating that a referent is locatable in that frame. The data written by Korean speakers show that in many cases there is a lack of identifiable interference from Korean, demonstrating that the complexity of the definite article itself often plays more of a role in the production of errors than interference from the native language. The data from native speakers show that frame anaphora can be used for the stylistic purpose of bringing the reader into the writer's perspective."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Frame anaphora: The definite article in discourse"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Moses, Rae","Gundlach, Robert"],"dc:creator":["Yontz, Ruth Ann"],"dc:date":["1988"],"dc:description":["The definite article is a problematic feature of language for many nonnative speakers of English. This study investigates one use of the definite article in the written discourse of native and nonnative speakers. This use, which I term frame anaphora, is illustrated in the following example: 'The disease is usually harmless, but the symptoms are dramatic. The use of the definite article presumes a shared knowledge that diseases have symptoms, a kind of shared generic knowledge which has been characterized using the notion of frame (Minsky, 1975; Fillmore, 1975, 1976; DuBois, 1980). A theory of frame anaphora, which is a modified version of Hawkins• (1978) theory of the definite article, is developed and used to analyze essays written by university students in response to a writing task assigned in rhetoric and English as a Second Language classes. The specific objectives of the analysis are to investigate how frame anaphora functions in discourse, what aspects of frame anaphora are problematic for nonnative speakers, and how native speakers' use of frame anaphora differs from that of nonnative speakers’. A subset of data written by Korean speakers is analyzed to determine if native language can account for the writers' errors in using frame anaphora. The data show that in addition to making syntactic errors, nonnative speakers have problems with two basic pragmatic aspects of frame anaphora: establishing a frame in discourse and explicitly indicating that a referent is locatable in that frame. The data written by Korean speakers show that in many cases there is a lack of identifiable interference from Korean, demonstrating that the complexity of the definite article itself often plays more of a role in the production of errors than interference from the native language. The data from native speakers show that frame anaphora can be used for the stylistic purpose of bringing the reader into the writer's perspective."],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125933"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright owned by the author."],"dc:subject":["Teaching English as Second Language"],"dc:title":["Frame anaphora: The definite article in discourse"],"dc:type":["Dissertation/Thesis","text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teaching English as a Second Language"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Northwestern University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z"}