{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125907"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125907","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"An investigation of the reliability of L2 learners' grammaticality judgments","abstract":"This thesis investigates the reliability of L2 learners' grammatical judgments of relative clause structures and how well their judgments support the construct validity of the Keenan & Comrie (19 77) accessibility hierarchy. The study was a replication with modifications of Gass (1994). The experiment employed a test-retest design with a one week interval between administration, using a computer administrated grammaticality judgment task and a written sentence combining task. Three proficiency groups, low, intermediate and high, took part in the experiment and were compared with a control group. Significant correlations were found across proficiency groups and on various sentence types. High correlations were found from one administration to _the other on both tasks, which support the reliability of L2 learners grammaticality judgments. The patterning of the data contrasted dramatically with Gass's results regarding the AH, indicating that this measure has little construct validity as a research tool.","abstract_html":"This thesis investigates the reliability of L2 learners' grammatical judgments of relative clause structures and how well their judgments support the construct validity of the Keenan & Comrie (19 77) accessibility hierarchy. The study was a replication with modifications of Gass (1994). The experiment employed a test-retest design with a one week interval between administration, using a computer administrated grammaticality judgment task and a written sentence combining task. Three proficiency groups, low, intermediate and high, took part in the experiment and were compared with a control group. Significant correlations were found across proficiency groups and on various sentence types. High correlations were found from one administration to _the other on both tasks, which support the reliability of L2 learners grammaticality judgments. The patterning of the data contrasted dramatically with Gass's results regarding the AH, indicating that this measure has little construct validity as a research tool.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["McCune, Eric Scott"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Teaching English as a Second Language","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Cowan, Ronayne"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1997,"date_issued":"1997","date_published":"1997","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z","subjects":["Grammatical judgement","Relative clause structures","L2 learners","Sentence combining"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright owned by the author."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125907","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Cowan, Ronayne"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["McCune, Eric Scott"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1997"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation/Thesis","text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teaching English as a Second Language"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Grammatical judgement","Relative clause structures","L2 learners","Sentence combining"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright owned by the author."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125907"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis investigates the reliability of L2 learners' grammatical judgments of relative clause structures and how well their judgments support the construct validity of the Keenan & Comrie (19 77) accessibility hierarchy. The study was a replication with modifications of Gass (1994). The experiment employed a test-retest design with a one week interval between administration, using a computer administrated grammaticality judgment task and a written sentence combining task. Three proficiency groups, low, intermediate and high, took part in the experiment and were compared with a control group. Significant correlations were found across proficiency groups and on various sentence types. High correlations were found from one administration to _the other on both tasks, which support the reliability of L2 learners grammaticality judgments. The patterning of the data contrasted dramatically with Gass's results regarding the AH, indicating that this measure has little construct validity as a research tool."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["An investigation of the reliability of L2 learners' grammaticality judgments"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Cowan, Ronayne"],"dc:creator":["McCune, Eric Scott"],"dc:date":["1997"],"dc:description":["This thesis investigates the reliability of L2 learners' grammatical judgments of relative clause structures and how well their judgments support the construct validity of the Keenan & Comrie (19 77) accessibility hierarchy. The study was a replication with modifications of Gass (1994). The experiment employed a test-retest design with a one week interval between administration, using a computer administrated grammaticality judgment task and a written sentence combining task. Three proficiency groups, low, intermediate and high, took part in the experiment and were compared with a control group. Significant correlations were found across proficiency groups and on various sentence types. High correlations were found from one administration to _the other on both tasks, which support the reliability of L2 learners grammaticality judgments. The patterning of the data contrasted dramatically with Gass's results regarding the AH, indicating that this measure has little construct validity as a research tool."],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125907"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright owned by the author."],"dc:subject":["Grammatical judgement","Relative clause structures","L2 learners","Sentence combining"],"dc:title":["An investigation of the reliability of L2 learners' grammaticality judgments"],"dc:type":["Dissertation/Thesis","text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teaching English as a Second Language"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z"}