{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125527"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/125527","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Teacher union involvement in the English for the Children ballot initiative campaigns","abstract":"Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-02-04 without embargo terms","abstract_html":"Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-02-04 without embargo terms","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Zeiter, Seth Bradley"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ed.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Kalantzis, Mary","Cope, Bill","Davila, Liv T","Kang, Hyun-Sook"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-07-10","date_published":"2024-07-10","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z","subjects":["Social Movement Unionism","Teacher Unions","Critical Discourse Analysis","Interpretive Methods","Resource Mobilization Theory"],"languages":["en","eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2024 Seth Zeiter"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125527","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Kalantzis, Mary","Cope, Bill","Davila, Liv T","Kang, Hyun-Sook"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Zeiter, Seth Bradley"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2024-07-10","2024-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Social Movement Unionism","Teacher Unions","Critical Discourse Analysis","Interpretive Methods","Resource Mobilization Theory"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2024 Seth Zeiter"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125527"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-02-04 without embargo terms","The student, Seth Zeiter, accepted the attached license on 2024-06-18 at 22:49.","The student, Seth Zeiter, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2024-06-18 at 22:57.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2024-07-10 at 15:01.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #20853 on 2025-02-04 at 21:03:46","This study examined and provided an account of teacher unions’ involvement in the English for the Children movement’s ballot initiative campaigns in California (Proposition 227), Arizona (Proposition 203), Colorado (Amendment 31), and Massachusetts (Question 2), with additional focus on a failed campaign in New York. The objectives of this interpretive research study were to a) provide a descriptive account of teacher unions’ involvement in these ballot initiative campaigns; and b) analyze teacher unions’ priorities during these ballot initiative campaigns. This research used an interpretive design, specifically critical discourse analysis in the discourse-historical approach, in conjunction with resource mobilization theory and social movement unionism to analyze secondary documents, such as news reports and broadcasts. News articles and broadcasts from online archives were collected into an untagged corpus for quantitative corpus analysis to gain insight into relevant linguistic features (i.e., keywords, word frequencies, collocations, and n-grams) to inform the contextual text coding process, which guided the analysis. The study found that teacher unions were not concerned with the English for the Children ballot initiative campaigns likely due to two primary reasons: 1) It was not a concern from an industrial perspective; and 2) Other, more existential threats to union power and influence, such as the school choice movement, were more important to union officials. It also found that Latinx voters were highly politicized as a voting bloc for political campaigns in general, which led to a distorted perception of their power that is likely related to the anti-immigrant sentiment expressed by English for the Children. The study concludes by recommending teacher unions use the tenets of social movement unionism to garner more support amongst community members so that teacher unions can both be more effective advocates of reform and better negotiators for their union members."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Teacher union involvement in the English for the Children ballot initiative campaigns"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Kalantzis, Mary","Cope, Bill","Davila, Liv T","Kang, Hyun-Sook"],"dc:creator":["Zeiter, Seth Bradley"],"dc:date":["2024-07-10","2024-08"],"dc:description":["Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2025-02-04 without embargo terms","The student, Seth Zeiter, accepted the attached license on 2024-06-18 at 22:49.","The student, Seth Zeiter, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2024-06-18 at 22:57.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2024-07-10 at 15:01.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #20853 on 2025-02-04 at 21:03:46","This study examined and provided an account of teacher unions’ involvement in the English for the Children movement’s ballot initiative campaigns in California (Proposition 227), Arizona (Proposition 203), Colorado (Amendment 31), and Massachusetts (Question 2), with additional focus on a failed campaign in New York. The objectives of this interpretive research study were to a) provide a descriptive account of teacher unions’ involvement in these ballot initiative campaigns; and b) analyze teacher unions’ priorities during these ballot initiative campaigns. This research used an interpretive design, specifically critical discourse analysis in the discourse-historical approach, in conjunction with resource mobilization theory and social movement unionism to analyze secondary documents, such as news reports and broadcasts. News articles and broadcasts from online archives were collected into an untagged corpus for quantitative corpus analysis to gain insight into relevant linguistic features (i.e., keywords, word frequencies, collocations, and n-grams) to inform the contextual text coding process, which guided the analysis. The study found that teacher unions were not concerned with the English for the Children ballot initiative campaigns likely due to two primary reasons: 1) It was not a concern from an industrial perspective; and 2) Other, more existential threats to union power and influence, such as the school choice movement, were more important to union officials. It also found that Latinx voters were highly politicized as a voting bloc for political campaigns in general, which led to a distorted perception of their power that is likely related to the anti-immigrant sentiment expressed by English for the Children. The study concludes by recommending teacher unions use the tenets of social movement unionism to garner more support amongst community members so that teacher unions can both be more effective advocates of reform and better negotiators for their union members."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/125527"],"dc:language":["en","eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2024 Seth Zeiter"],"dc:subject":["Social Movement Unionism","Teacher Unions","Critical Discourse Analysis","Interpretive Methods","Resource Mobilization Theory"],"dc:title":["Teacher union involvement in the English for the Children ballot initiative campaigns"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z"}