{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/124517"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/124517","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Inimicitiae in Tacitus","abstract":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2026-05-01","abstract_html":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2026-05-01","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Rudman, Nicholas Arthur"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Classical Philology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Walters, Brian","Augoustakis, Antony","Traill, Ariana","Williams, Craig"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-05","date_published":"2024-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z","subjects":["Latin Literature","Imperial Literature","Historiography","Tacitus","Enmity","Interpersonal Conflict"],"languages":["en","eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2024 Nicholas Rudman"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/124517","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Walters, Brian","Augoustakis, Antony","Traill, Ariana","Williams, Craig"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Rudman, Nicholas Arthur"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2024-05","2024-04-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Classical Philology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Latin Literature","Imperial Literature","Historiography","Tacitus","Enmity","Interpersonal Conflict"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2024 Nicholas Rudman"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/124517"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2026-05-01","The student, Nicholas Rudman, accepted the attached license on 2024-04-11 at 11:31.","The student, Nicholas Rudman, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2024-04-11 at 11:55.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2024-04-12 at 16:27.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #20360 on 2024-09-16 at 00:43:24","This dissertation analyzes the depiction of personal feuding, or inimicitiae, within Tacitus’ historical works. Said analysis is grounded in passages from Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus which imply that the ability to regulate feuding among citizens is a key means of evaluating a system of government and that the Roman republic collapsed because it failed to do so. Accordingly, Tacitus’ portrayal of enmity serves as a means of illuminating his depiction of the principate. I begin by reconstructing early 2nd-century C.E. beliefs concerning republican feuding through analyzing the work of Tacitus, his contemporaries, and earlier literature that likely influenced the historian’s thought. I also demonstrate that Tacitus’ emperors strive to present themselves as controlling the harmful effects of inimicitiae, even if they do not always live up to this ideal. The second chapter focuses on feuding over the imperial succession, arguing that the question of choosing the next ruler produced endless fights over power resembling those that destroyed the republic. My third chapter examines feuds that do not involve the imperial family directly and demonstrates that while the change in governments did alter the ways in which elite Romans conducted inimicitiae, said changes did not make feuding less dangerous and opened new opportunities for enemies to use the legal system against one another. Finally, I conclude by discussing reconciliation in Tacitus, contending that the historian shows that the emperors genuinely could act as “reconcilers-in-chief” who settled the feuds of their subjects, but that in practice, they more often abuse this role to protect their corrupt underlings. These points build to the main conclusion, namely that in Tacitus’ presentation, the changes to the nature of inimicitiae brought about by the emperors hardly solved the problem of feuding. This aligns with recent scholarly trends arguing that Tacitus does not present a solution to any issue, but rather prompts his audience to consider the strengths and weaknesses of different alternatives."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Inimicitiae in Tacitus"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Walters, Brian","Augoustakis, Antony","Traill, Ariana","Williams, Craig"],"dc:creator":["Rudman, Nicholas Arthur"],"dc:date":["2024-05","2024-04-12"],"dc:description":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2026-05-01","The student, Nicholas Rudman, accepted the attached license on 2024-04-11 at 11:31.","The student, Nicholas Rudman, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2024-04-11 at 11:55.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2024-04-12 at 16:27.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #20360 on 2024-09-16 at 00:43:24","This dissertation analyzes the depiction of personal feuding, or inimicitiae, within Tacitus’ historical works. Said analysis is grounded in passages from Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus which imply that the ability to regulate feuding among citizens is a key means of evaluating a system of government and that the Roman republic collapsed because it failed to do so. Accordingly, Tacitus’ portrayal of enmity serves as a means of illuminating his depiction of the principate. I begin by reconstructing early 2nd-century C.E. beliefs concerning republican feuding through analyzing the work of Tacitus, his contemporaries, and earlier literature that likely influenced the historian’s thought. I also demonstrate that Tacitus’ emperors strive to present themselves as controlling the harmful effects of inimicitiae, even if they do not always live up to this ideal. The second chapter focuses on feuding over the imperial succession, arguing that the question of choosing the next ruler produced endless fights over power resembling those that destroyed the republic. My third chapter examines feuds that do not involve the imperial family directly and demonstrates that while the change in governments did alter the ways in which elite Romans conducted inimicitiae, said changes did not make feuding less dangerous and opened new opportunities for enemies to use the legal system against one another. Finally, I conclude by discussing reconciliation in Tacitus, contending that the historian shows that the emperors genuinely could act as “reconcilers-in-chief” who settled the feuds of their subjects, but that in practice, they more often abuse this role to protect their corrupt underlings. These points build to the main conclusion, namely that in Tacitus’ presentation, the changes to the nature of inimicitiae brought about by the emperors hardly solved the problem of feuding. This aligns with recent scholarly trends arguing that Tacitus does not present a solution to any issue, but rather prompts his audience to consider the strengths and weaknesses of different alternatives."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/124517"],"dc:language":["en","eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2024 Nicholas Rudman"],"dc:subject":["Latin Literature","Imperial Literature","Historiography","Tacitus","Enmity","Interpersonal Conflict"],"dc:title":["Inimicitiae in Tacitus"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Classical Philology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:02Z"}