{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/120478"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/120478","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"A matter of context: Contextualization enhances the criterion-related validity of forced-choice measurement","abstract":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","abstract_html":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Li, Lingyue"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Drasgow, Fritz"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2023,"date_issued":"2023-05","date_published":"2023-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:57Z","subjects":["Forced-choice","Personality","Contextualization","Validity","Measurement"],"languages":["en","eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2023 Lingyue Li"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120478","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Drasgow, Fritz"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Li, Lingyue"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2023-05","2022-12-21"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Forced-choice","Personality","Contextualization","Validity","Measurement"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2023 Lingyue Li"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120478"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","The student, Lingyue Li, accepted the attached license on 2022-12-20 at 12:49.","The student, Lingyue Li, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2022-12-20 at 12:53.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2022-12-21 at 09:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #18808 on 2023-09-01 at 17:18:30","Previous studies showed that contextualization can improve the reliability and criterion-related validity of single-statement personality measures. However, it is unknown whether contextualization has similar effects on forced-choice measures of personality. If so, what type of contextualization is the most effective? The present study provides the first empirical examination of the effects of three types of contextualization on the reliability and criterion-related validity of forced-choice personality measures using an experimental design and cross-validates results through two forced-choice personality measures. We also report the effect of contextualization on discriminant validity. Results showed that while contextualization has no systematic effect on the reliability of forced-choice scores, it improves their criterion-related validity substantially. Specifically, contextualization of both the statements and instructions yielded the highest levels of criterion-related validity, followed by statement contextualization only and then instruction contextualization only. The original scales with no contextualization showed the lowest levels of criterion-related validity. As for discriminant validity, contextualization increased intercorrelations. These patterns were well replicated across the two forced-choice scales."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A matter of context: Contextualization enhances the criterion-related validity of forced-choice measurement"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Drasgow, Fritz"],"dc:creator":["Li, Lingyue"],"dc:date":["2023-05","2022-12-21"],"dc:description":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","The student, Lingyue Li, accepted the attached license on 2022-12-20 at 12:49.","The student, Lingyue Li, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2022-12-20 at 12:53.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2022-12-21 at 09:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #18808 on 2023-09-01 at 17:18:30","Previous studies showed that contextualization can improve the reliability and criterion-related validity of single-statement personality measures. However, it is unknown whether contextualization has similar effects on forced-choice measures of personality. If so, what type of contextualization is the most effective? The present study provides the first empirical examination of the effects of three types of contextualization on the reliability and criterion-related validity of forced-choice personality measures using an experimental design and cross-validates results through two forced-choice personality measures. We also report the effect of contextualization on discriminant validity. Results showed that while contextualization has no systematic effect on the reliability of forced-choice scores, it improves their criterion-related validity substantially. Specifically, contextualization of both the statements and instructions yielded the highest levels of criterion-related validity, followed by statement contextualization only and then instruction contextualization only. The original scales with no contextualization showed the lowest levels of criterion-related validity. As for discriminant validity, contextualization increased intercorrelations. These patterns were well replicated across the two forced-choice scales."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120478"],"dc:language":["en","eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2023 Lingyue Li"],"dc:subject":["Forced-choice","Personality","Contextualization","Validity","Measurement"],"dc:title":["A matter of context: Contextualization enhances the criterion-related validity of forced-choice measurement"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:57Z"}