{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/120476"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/120476","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Anchoring vignette: the good, the bad and the ugly","abstract":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","abstract_html":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Chen, Yueyang"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Drasgow, Fritz","Rounds, James"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2023,"date_issued":"2023-05","date_published":"2023-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:57Z","subjects":["Personality Measure","Response Bias","Anchoring Vignette","Forced Choice"],"languages":["en","eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2023 Yueyang Chen"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120476","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Drasgow, Fritz","Rounds, James"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Chen, Yueyang"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2023-05","2022-12-19"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Personality Measure","Response Bias","Anchoring Vignette","Forced Choice"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2023 Yueyang Chen"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120476"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","The student, Yueyang Chen, accepted the attached license on 2022-12-09 at 16:48.","The student, Yueyang Chen, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2022-12-09 at 17:04.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2022-12-19 at 14:16.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #18796 on 2023-09-01 at 17:17:54","Self-report Likert-type personality measures have long co-existed with response styles and reference group biases. These issues, when unaddressed, can influence the reliability, validity, and cross-cultural comparability of personality scales. A posterior bias-correction method promised to address these challenges called anchoring vignette was tested in the current study. Using three samples collected in China and the US, the author examined the bias-correction power of anchoring vignette in the following scenarios: 1) when vignettes are written in a domain-specific vs. domain-general fashion. 2) when vignette assumptions are violated vs. not violated. 3) when vignettes are compared to forced choice measures, -- an a priori bias-prevention method. Results showed that domain specificity influenced the validity of vignette-recoded data, with domain-specific vignette being the more desirable approach. Measurement properties of the vignette-recoded data were negatively influenced by the violation of vignette equivalence assumption. And the overall bias-correction power of anchoring vignette is inferior to forced choice."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Anchoring vignette: the good, the bad and the ugly"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Drasgow, Fritz","Rounds, James"],"dc:creator":["Chen, Yueyang"],"dc:date":["2023-05","2022-12-19"],"dc:description":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2025-05-01","The student, Yueyang Chen, accepted the attached license on 2022-12-09 at 16:48.","The student, Yueyang Chen, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2022-12-09 at 17:04.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2022-12-19 at 14:16.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #18796 on 2023-09-01 at 17:17:54","Self-report Likert-type personality measures have long co-existed with response styles and reference group biases. These issues, when unaddressed, can influence the reliability, validity, and cross-cultural comparability of personality scales. A posterior bias-correction method promised to address these challenges called anchoring vignette was tested in the current study. Using three samples collected in China and the US, the author examined the bias-correction power of anchoring vignette in the following scenarios: 1) when vignettes are written in a domain-specific vs. domain-general fashion. 2) when vignette assumptions are violated vs. not violated. 3) when vignettes are compared to forced choice measures, -- an a priori bias-prevention method. Results showed that domain specificity influenced the validity of vignette-recoded data, with domain-specific vignette being the more desirable approach. Measurement properties of the vignette-recoded data were negatively influenced by the violation of vignette equivalence assumption. And the overall bias-correction power of anchoring vignette is inferior to forced choice."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://hdl.handle.net/2142/120476"],"dc:language":["en","eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2023 Yueyang Chen"],"dc:subject":["Personality Measure","Response Bias","Anchoring Vignette","Forced Choice"],"dc:title":["Anchoring vignette: the good, the bad and the ugly"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:57Z"}