{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113940"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113940","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Anxious to detect deceit?: An empirical investigation of social defense theory","abstract":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-12-01","abstract_html":"Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-12-01","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lozano, Elizabeth Barlow"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Fraley, R. Chris","Simons , Daniel","Ogolsky, Brian","Derringer, Jaime","Briley, Daniel"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-04-29T21:41:39Z","date_published":"2022-04-29T21:41:39Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:53Z","subjects":["adult attachment","lie detection","social defense theory","multi-level modeling"],"languages":["en","eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2021 Elizabeth Lozano"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113940","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Fraley, R. Chris","Simons , Daniel","Ogolsky, Brian","Derringer, Jaime","Briley, Daniel"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lozano, Elizabeth Barlow"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2022-04-29T21:41:39Z","2024-04-29T21:47:53Z","2021-12","2021-08-03"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["adult attachment","lie detection","social defense theory","multi-level modeling"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2021 Elizabeth Lozano"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113940"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-12-01","The student, Elizabeth Lozano, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-29 at 13:13.","The student, Elizabeth Lozano, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-07-29 at 13:15.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-08-03 at 13:14.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #17093 on 2022-04-06 at 17:16:10","Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-29T21:41:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LOZANO-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 831445 bytes, checksum: 2187262bf7c12f50a27c4d084fe06772 (MD5) Files.zip: 547211 bytes, checksum: 0dba7a3cc33267a6bc1a8bbe7535e59f (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: e7e00fbc0e289b41570b8dc622651a66 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-08-03","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:41:44Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:42:24Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:43:01Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:44:44Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:46:25Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:47:53Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only","\"An extension of attachment theory called Social Defense Theory (Ein-Dor et al., 2010) holds that insecure attachment reflects an adaptive reaction called sentinel behavior – the tendency to notice ambiguous signs of threat, and warn others about that threat (Ein-Dor et al., 2010). Although Social Defense Theory provides an intriguing way to understand the adaptive consequences of insecure attachment, previous work has not been positioned to examine what \"\"detection\"\" means in the kind of detail needed to fully test the theory. The present dissertation aims to empirically examine whether the association between attachment anxiety and lie detection (i.e., claiming that something is a lie) is a result of two separable processes: discrimination and bias. Self-reports of attachment were collected from 254 adults who were asked to watch a series of videos in which they had to determine whether the people in them were lying or telling the truth. Multi-level logistic models (MLLMs) were used to assess the associations between individual differences in attachment and lie detection. The findings revealed that highly anxious participants did not demonstrate superior discrimination compared to their less anxious counterparts. Rather, attachment anxiety was positively associated with a tendency to detect lies regardless of trial type, revealing that highly anxious participants were more biased to detect deceit. Taken together, these findings underscore the importance of revising or abandoning Social Defense Theory, as it does not afford an adaptiveness explanation with respect to deception judgments.\""]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Anxious to detect deceit?: An empirical investigation of social defense theory"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Fraley, R. Chris","Simons , Daniel","Ogolsky, Brian","Derringer, Jaime","Briley, Daniel"],"dc:creator":["Lozano, Elizabeth Barlow"],"dc:date":["2022-04-29T21:41:39Z","2024-04-29T21:47:53Z","2021-12","2021-08-03"],"dc:description":["Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-12-01","The student, Elizabeth Lozano, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-29 at 13:13.","The student, Elizabeth Lozano, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-07-29 at 13:15.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-08-03 at 13:14.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #17093 on 2022-04-06 at 17:16:10","Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-29T21:41:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LOZANO-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 831445 bytes, checksum: 2187262bf7c12f50a27c4d084fe06772 (MD5) Files.zip: 547211 bytes, checksum: 0dba7a3cc33267a6bc1a8bbe7535e59f (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: e7e00fbc0e289b41570b8dc622651a66 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-08-03","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:41:44Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:42:24Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:43:01Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:44:44Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:46:25Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 123301 Lift date: 2024-04-29T21:47:53Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only","\"An extension of attachment theory called Social Defense Theory (Ein-Dor et al., 2010) holds that insecure attachment reflects an adaptive reaction called sentinel behavior – the tendency to notice ambiguous signs of threat, and warn others about that threat (Ein-Dor et al., 2010). Although Social Defense Theory provides an intriguing way to understand the adaptive consequences of insecure attachment, previous work has not been positioned to examine what \"\"detection\"\" means in the kind of detail needed to fully test the theory. The present dissertation aims to empirically examine whether the association between attachment anxiety and lie detection (i.e., claiming that something is a lie) is a result of two separable processes: discrimination and bias. Self-reports of attachment were collected from 254 adults who were asked to watch a series of videos in which they had to determine whether the people in them were lying or telling the truth. Multi-level logistic models (MLLMs) were used to assess the associations between individual differences in attachment and lie detection. The findings revealed that highly anxious participants did not demonstrate superior discrimination compared to their less anxious counterparts. Rather, attachment anxiety was positively associated with a tendency to detect lies regardless of trial type, revealing that highly anxious participants were more biased to detect deceit. Taken together, these findings underscore the importance of revising or abandoning Social Defense Theory, as it does not afford an adaptiveness explanation with respect to deception judgments.\""],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113940"],"dc:language":["en","eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2021 Elizabeth Lozano"],"dc:subject":["adult attachment","lie detection","social defense theory","multi-level modeling"],"dc:title":["Anxious to detect deceit?: An empirical investigation of social defense theory"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:53Z"}