{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113176"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113176","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Evaluation of the difference between two spatiotemporal random fields","abstract":"Comparing the spatial characteristics of spatiotemporal random fields is often in demand in various fields of study. Especially in climatology, people are interested in learning the difference between the synthetic climate simulation model and climate field reconstructions (CFR) which are estimates of the past climate constructed based on the proxy data. The thesis focuses on testing the two spatiotemporal climate fields. First, as assessing the CFR skill is critical for improving their interpretation and ultimately for deriving better CFR estimates, we apply new methods for assessing spatiotemporal skill using formalized null hypotheses. The test provides a detailed assessment of why CFR skill varies across multiple methods, with implications for improving future CFR estimates. Also, it will be more informative, if we could point out where the difference is located by conducting the hypothesis at each location. However, comparing spatiotemporal random fields at each location requires adjusting the multiplicity due to multiple comparisons. We develop a new multiple testing approach to detect the local differences in the spatial characteristics of two spatiotemporal random fields by taking the spatial information into account. The developed procedure is robust to model misspecification and allows for weak dependency among hypotheses. Lastly, predicting the future climate extreme is critical as the consequences of the extreme temperature or precipitation include high mortality rate or impact on agriculture and infrastructure. However, to date, very little work has investigated the difference in the extreme value behavior between two climate fields. The last chapter introduces how we assess the spatial extreme difference of two spatial random fields. This developed procedure could be employed to assess whether the maximum precipitation of the climate simulation models captures real data’s extreme behavior.","abstract_html":"Comparing the spatial characteristics of spatiotemporal random fields is often in demand in various fields of study. Especially in climatology, people are interested in learning the difference between the synthetic climate simulation model and climate field reconstructions (CFR) which are estimates of the past climate constructed based on the proxy data. The thesis focuses on testing the two spatiotemporal climate fields. First, as assessing the CFR skill is critical for improving their interpretation and ultimately for deriving better CFR estimates, we apply new methods for assessing spatiotemporal skill using formalized null hypotheses. The test provides a detailed assessment of why CFR skill varies across multiple methods, with implications for improving future CFR estimates. Also, it will be more informative, if we could point out where the difference is located by conducting the hypothesis at each location. However, comparing spatiotemporal random fields at each location requires adjusting the multiplicity due to multiple comparisons. We develop a new multiple testing approach to detect the local differences in the spatial characteristics of two spatiotemporal random fields by taking the spatial information into account. The developed procedure is robust to model misspecification and allows for weak dependency among hypotheses. Lastly, predicting the future climate extreme is critical as the consequences of the extreme temperature or precipitation include high mortality rate or impact on agriculture and infrastructure. However, to date, very little work has investigated the difference in the extreme value behavior between two climate fields. The last chapter introduces how we assess the spatial extreme difference of two spatial random fields. This developed procedure could be employed to assess whether the maximum precipitation of the climate simulation models captures real data’s extreme behavior.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Yun, Sooin"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Statistics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Li, Bo","Simpson, Douglas","Shao, Xiaofeng","Zhao, Sihai Dave"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-01-12T22:35:11Z","date_published":"2022-01-12T22:35:11Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:53Z","subjects":["Spatiotemporal random fields","Multiple tests","FDR control","Spatial Extremes"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2021 Sooin Yun"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113176","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Li, Bo","Simpson, Douglas","Shao, Xiaofeng","Zhao, Sihai Dave"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Yun, Sooin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2022-01-12T22:35:11Z","2024-01-12T22:35:30Z","2021-07-13","2021-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Statistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Spatiotemporal random fields","Multiple tests","FDR control","Spatial Extremes"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2021 Sooin Yun"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113176"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Comparing the spatial characteristics of spatiotemporal random fields is often in demand in various fields of study. Especially in climatology, people are interested in learning the difference between the synthetic climate simulation model and climate field reconstructions (CFR) which are estimates of the past climate constructed based on the proxy data. The thesis focuses on testing the two spatiotemporal climate fields. First, as assessing the CFR skill is critical for improving their interpretation and ultimately for deriving better CFR estimates, we apply new methods for assessing spatiotemporal skill using formalized null hypotheses. The test provides a detailed assessment of why CFR skill varies across multiple methods, with implications for improving future CFR estimates. Also, it will be more informative, if we could point out where the difference is located by conducting the hypothesis at each location. However, comparing spatiotemporal random fields at each location requires adjusting the multiplicity due to multiple comparisons. We develop a new multiple testing approach to detect the local differences in the spatial characteristics of two spatiotemporal random fields by taking the spatial information into account. The developed procedure is robust to model misspecification and allows for weak dependency among hypotheses. Lastly, predicting the future climate extreme is critical as the consequences of the extreme temperature or precipitation include high mortality rate or impact on agriculture and infrastructure. However, to date, very little work has investigated the difference in the extreme value behavior between two climate fields. The last chapter introduces how we assess the spatial extreme difference of two spatial random fields. This developed procedure could be employed to assess whether the maximum precipitation of the climate simulation models captures real data’s extreme behavior.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-08-01","The student, Sooin Yun, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-12 at 12:25.","The student, Sooin Yun, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-07-12 at 12:33.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-07-13 at 11:02.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16867 on 2022-01-12 at 12:54:36","Made available in DSpace on 2022-01-12T22:35:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 YUN-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 11051124 bytes, checksum: 0dc49e00854e61031a7189f2baf1fe78 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4206 bytes, checksum: 6bd23dea8e75c56c77b7c89dc74a474a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-07-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 121102 Lift date: 2024-01-12T22:35:30Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Evaluation of the difference between two spatiotemporal random fields"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Li, Bo","Simpson, Douglas","Shao, Xiaofeng","Zhao, Sihai Dave"],"dc:creator":["Yun, Sooin"],"dc:date":["2022-01-12T22:35:11Z","2024-01-12T22:35:30Z","2021-07-13","2021-08"],"dc:description":["Comparing the spatial characteristics of spatiotemporal random fields is often in demand in various fields of study. Especially in climatology, people are interested in learning the difference between the synthetic climate simulation model and climate field reconstructions (CFR) which are estimates of the past climate constructed based on the proxy data. The thesis focuses on testing the two spatiotemporal climate fields. First, as assessing the CFR skill is critical for improving their interpretation and ultimately for deriving better CFR estimates, we apply new methods for assessing spatiotemporal skill using formalized null hypotheses. The test provides a detailed assessment of why CFR skill varies across multiple methods, with implications for improving future CFR estimates. Also, it will be more informative, if we could point out where the difference is located by conducting the hypothesis at each location. However, comparing spatiotemporal random fields at each location requires adjusting the multiplicity due to multiple comparisons. We develop a new multiple testing approach to detect the local differences in the spatial characteristics of two spatiotemporal random fields by taking the spatial information into account. The developed procedure is robust to model misspecification and allows for weak dependency among hypotheses. Lastly, predicting the future climate extreme is critical as the consequences of the extreme temperature or precipitation include high mortality rate or impact on agriculture and infrastructure. However, to date, very little work has investigated the difference in the extreme value behavior between two climate fields. The last chapter introduces how we assess the spatial extreme difference of two spatial random fields. This developed procedure could be employed to assess whether the maximum precipitation of the climate simulation models captures real data’s extreme behavior.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-08-01","The student, Sooin Yun, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-12 at 12:25.","The student, Sooin Yun, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-07-12 at 12:33.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-07-13 at 11:02.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16867 on 2022-01-12 at 12:54:36","Made available in DSpace on 2022-01-12T22:35:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 YUN-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 11051124 bytes, checksum: 0dc49e00854e61031a7189f2baf1fe78 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4206 bytes, checksum: 6bd23dea8e75c56c77b7c89dc74a474a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-07-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 121102 Lift date: 2024-01-12T22:35:30Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113176"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2021 Sooin Yun"],"dc:subject":["Spatiotemporal random fields","Multiple tests","FDR control","Spatial Extremes"],"dc:title":["Evaluation of the difference between two spatiotemporal random fields"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Statistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:53Z"}