{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113039"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113039","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Accounting expertise and decision-making through the lens of Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT)","abstract":"Fuzzy Trace Theory (FTT) states that with experience in a domain, experts base their decisions on the meaning of the information (gist) rather than the verbatim details, reflecting the use of domain knowledge. FTT studies demonstrate that experts and novices construct different levels of memory representation. Experts are more likely to construct gist-based representations, while novices focus more on verbatim content. However, the investigation of the interrelationships among professional expertise, levels of memory representation, and decision-making in quantitative domains (e.g., accounting) is understudied. Hence, I investigate whether, and under what conditions, accounting experts are more likely than novices to use gist-based rather than verbatim representations of numeric information to make financial decisions. The accounting context provides a strong test of the idea that even experts in quantitative domains, who have great deal of experience working with numbers, move from verbatim to gist-based representations with experience. In two experimental studies with different task-related memory and decision demands, accounting experts and novices evaluated sets of financial indicators for companies (e.g., profitability) along with respective benchmarks (e.g., industry averages, compare companies). Experiment 1 investigated the evaluation of several accounting/financial indicators of a single company against benchmark values, asking participants to judge the likelihood that this company experiences financial problems. Experiment 2 compared multiple companies in a portfolio to make investment recommendations. The studies investigated not only whether experts outperform novices in making financial decisions, but also addressed why (role of domain-knowledge in memory representations). Results from these two studies suggest that although gist memory was more accurate for both groups, experts were more accurate than novices in remembering the gist of the financial information, and conversely novices were more accurate than experts for verbatim memory. In both studies, experts were usually more accurate in their decisions (e.g., choosing the best investment based on valuation metrics in the portfolios) compared to novices. Furthermore, the results highlight the importance of domain-knowledge on gist memory accuracy beyond other domain-general abilities in processing numeric information (e.g., numeracy, general memory abilities). The findings contribute to theories of expertise, memory and decision-making, with implications for improving accounting education and management information systems (e.g., design effective decision aids and curriculum).","abstract_html":"Fuzzy Trace Theory (FTT) states that with experience in a domain, experts base their decisions on the meaning of the information (gist) rather than the verbatim details, reflecting the use of domain knowledge. FTT studies demonstrate that experts and novices construct different levels of memory representation. Experts are more likely to construct gist-based representations, while novices focus more on verbatim content. However, the investigation of the interrelationships among professional expertise, levels of memory representation, and decision-making in quantitative domains (e.g., accounting) is understudied. Hence, I investigate whether, and under what conditions, accounting experts are more likely than novices to use gist-based rather than verbatim representations of numeric information to make financial decisions. The accounting context provides a strong test of the idea that even experts in quantitative domains, who have great deal of experience working with numbers, move from verbatim to gist-based representations with experience. In two experimental studies with different task-related memory and decision demands, accounting experts and novices evaluated sets of financial indicators for companies (e.g., profitability) along with respective benchmarks (e.g., industry averages, compare companies). Experiment 1 investigated the evaluation of several accounting/financial indicators of a single company against benchmark values, asking participants to judge the likelihood that this company experiences financial problems. Experiment 2 compared multiple companies in a portfolio to make investment recommendations. The studies investigated not only whether experts outperform novices in making financial decisions, but also addressed why (role of domain-knowledge in memory representations). Results from these two studies suggest that although gist memory was more accurate for both groups, experts were more accurate than novices in remembering the gist of the financial information, and conversely novices were more accurate than experts for verbatim memory. In both studies, experts were usually more accurate in their decisions (e.g., choosing the best investment based on valuation metrics in the portfolios) compared to novices. Furthermore, the results highlight the importance of domain-knowledge on gist memory accuracy beyond other domain-general abilities in processing numeric information (e.g., numeracy, general memory abilities). The findings contribute to theories of expertise, memory and decision-making, with implications for improving accounting education and management information systems (e.g., design effective decision aids and curriculum).","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ferreira Leitao Azevedo, Renato"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Morrow, Daniel G","Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.","Christianson, Kiel","Lyons, Angela C","Garcia-Retamero, Rocio"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-07-15","date_published":"2021-07-15","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z","subjects":["memory","decision-making","fuzzy-trace theory","expertise","domain-knowledge","cognition","accounting education","accounting expertise."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2021 Renato Ferreira Leitao Azevedo"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113039","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Morrow, Daniel G","Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.","Christianson, Kiel","Lyons, Angela C","Garcia-Retamero, Rocio"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ferreira Leitao Azevedo, Renato"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-07-15","2021-08","2022-01-12T21:45:42Z"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["memory","decision-making","fuzzy-trace theory","expertise","domain-knowledge","cognition","accounting education","accounting expertise."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2021 Renato Ferreira Leitao Azevedo"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113039"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Fuzzy Trace Theory (FTT) states that with experience in a domain, experts base their decisions on the meaning of the information (gist) rather than the verbatim details, reflecting the use of domain knowledge. FTT studies demonstrate that experts and novices construct different levels of memory representation. Experts are more likely to construct gist-based representations, while novices focus more on verbatim content. However, the investigation of the interrelationships among professional expertise, levels of memory representation, and decision-making in quantitative domains (e.g., accounting) is understudied. Hence, I investigate whether, and under what conditions, accounting experts are more likely than novices to use gist-based rather than verbatim representations of numeric information to make financial decisions. The accounting context provides a strong test of the idea that even experts in quantitative domains, who have great deal of experience working with numbers, move from verbatim to gist-based representations with experience. In two experimental studies with different task-related memory and decision demands, accounting experts and novices evaluated sets of financial indicators for companies (e.g., profitability) along with respective benchmarks (e.g., industry averages, compare companies). Experiment 1 investigated the evaluation of several accounting/financial indicators of a single company against benchmark values, asking participants to judge the likelihood that this company experiences financial problems. Experiment 2 compared multiple companies in a portfolio to make investment recommendations. The studies investigated not only whether experts outperform novices in making financial decisions, but also addressed why (role of domain-knowledge in memory representations). Results from these two studies suggest that although gist memory was more accurate for both groups, experts were more accurate than novices in remembering the gist of the financial information, and conversely novices were more accurate than experts for verbatim memory. In both studies, experts were usually more accurate in their decisions (e.g., choosing the best investment based on valuation metrics in the portfolios) compared to novices. Furthermore, the results highlight the importance of domain-knowledge on gist memory accuracy beyond other domain-general abilities in processing numeric information (e.g., numeracy, general memory abilities). The findings contribute to theories of expertise, memory and decision-making, with implications for improving accounting education and management information systems (e.g., design effective decision aids and curriculum).","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2022-01-12 without embargo terms","The student, Renato Ferreira Leitao Azevedo, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-13 at 16:19.","The student, Renato Ferreira Leitao Azevedo, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-07-13 at 16:29.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-07-15 at 17:45.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16919 on 2022-01-12 at 12:45:22","Made available in DSpace on 2022-01-12T21:45:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 FERREIRALEITAOAZEVEDO-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 1816448 bytes, checksum: 833f5823a9f8245d0669d2f3c2f01914 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4227 bytes, checksum: af229428dc014fca689438d8705068e5 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4573 bytes, checksum: fa74e2c76484e96bb933a6f005ae9a57 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-07-15"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Accounting expertise and decision-making through the lens of Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Morrow, Daniel G","Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.","Christianson, Kiel","Lyons, Angela C","Garcia-Retamero, Rocio"],"dc:creator":["Ferreira Leitao Azevedo, Renato"],"dc:date":["2021-07-15","2021-08","2022-01-12T21:45:42Z"],"dc:description":["Fuzzy Trace Theory (FTT) states that with experience in a domain, experts base their decisions on the meaning of the information (gist) rather than the verbatim details, reflecting the use of domain knowledge. FTT studies demonstrate that experts and novices construct different levels of memory representation. Experts are more likely to construct gist-based representations, while novices focus more on verbatim content. However, the investigation of the interrelationships among professional expertise, levels of memory representation, and decision-making in quantitative domains (e.g., accounting) is understudied. Hence, I investigate whether, and under what conditions, accounting experts are more likely than novices to use gist-based rather than verbatim representations of numeric information to make financial decisions. The accounting context provides a strong test of the idea that even experts in quantitative domains, who have great deal of experience working with numbers, move from verbatim to gist-based representations with experience. In two experimental studies with different task-related memory and decision demands, accounting experts and novices evaluated sets of financial indicators for companies (e.g., profitability) along with respective benchmarks (e.g., industry averages, compare companies). Experiment 1 investigated the evaluation of several accounting/financial indicators of a single company against benchmark values, asking participants to judge the likelihood that this company experiences financial problems. Experiment 2 compared multiple companies in a portfolio to make investment recommendations. The studies investigated not only whether experts outperform novices in making financial decisions, but also addressed why (role of domain-knowledge in memory representations). Results from these two studies suggest that although gist memory was more accurate for both groups, experts were more accurate than novices in remembering the gist of the financial information, and conversely novices were more accurate than experts for verbatim memory. In both studies, experts were usually more accurate in their decisions (e.g., choosing the best investment based on valuation metrics in the portfolios) compared to novices. Furthermore, the results highlight the importance of domain-knowledge on gist memory accuracy beyond other domain-general abilities in processing numeric information (e.g., numeracy, general memory abilities). The findings contribute to theories of expertise, memory and decision-making, with implications for improving accounting education and management information systems (e.g., design effective decision aids and curriculum).","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2022-01-12 without embargo terms","The student, Renato Ferreira Leitao Azevedo, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-13 at 16:19.","The student, Renato Ferreira Leitao Azevedo, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-07-13 at 16:29.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-07-15 at 17:45.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16919 on 2022-01-12 at 12:45:22","Made available in DSpace on 2022-01-12T21:45:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 FERREIRALEITAOAZEVEDO-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 1816448 bytes, checksum: 833f5823a9f8245d0669d2f3c2f01914 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4227 bytes, checksum: af229428dc014fca689438d8705068e5 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4573 bytes, checksum: fa74e2c76484e96bb933a6f005ae9a57 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-07-15"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113039"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2021 Renato Ferreira Leitao Azevedo"],"dc:subject":["memory","decision-making","fuzzy-trace theory","expertise","domain-knowledge","cognition","accounting education","accounting expertise."],"dc:title":["Accounting expertise and decision-making through the lens of Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT)"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z"}