{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113036"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/113036","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Duolingo and HelloTalk: analyzing and evaluating language learning applications using SLA theory and user feedback","abstract":"This study performs an evaluation of two language learning apps using established SLA principles and user-feedback through a survey and interviews. A survey asking users about level appropriateness, focus on form, Zone of Proximal Development and scaffolding, interaction, communicative language, noticing, and motivation and gamification was administered and followed up by interviews for details. Results showed that users generally rated Duolingo well in most capacities with its strongest factor being vocabulary for specific contexts and scenarios, but that the app was rarely rated as excellent in any category because of oversimplified grammar instruction, poor focus on form in terms of pronunciation, and some aspects of the app that lead to user frustration. HelloTalk however was often rated evenly across categories and ratings or in some cases had users give opposite or scattered ratings, with the general defining factor in satisfaction being whether the user found a reliable and helpful language exchange. Implications of these findings for app developers and app users is discussed in the conclusion.","abstract_html":"This study performs an evaluation of two language learning apps using established SLA principles and user-feedback through a survey and interviews. A survey asking users about level appropriateness, focus on form, Zone of Proximal Development and scaffolding, interaction, communicative language, noticing, and motivation and gamification was administered and followed up by interviews for details. Results showed that users generally rated Duolingo well in most capacities with its strongest factor being vocabulary for specific contexts and scenarios, but that the app was rarely rated as excellent in any category because of oversimplified grammar instruction, poor focus on form in terms of pronunciation, and some aspects of the app that lead to user frustration. HelloTalk however was often rated evenly across categories and ratings or in some cases had users give opposite or scattered ratings, with the general defining factor in satisfaction being whether the user found a reliable and helpful language exchange. Implications of these findings for app developers and app users is discussed in the conclusion.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Schroeder, Robert Charles"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Teaching of English Sec Lang","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sadler, Randall","Pierce, Lisa"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-01-12T21:45:42Z","date_published":"2022-01-12T21:45:42Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z","subjects":["Second Language Acquisition","Applications","Duolingo","HelloTalk","Evaluation","Survey","Focus on Form","Communicative Language","Noticing","Gamification","Learner Motivation","Level Appropriateness"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2021 Robert Schroeder"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113036","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Sadler, Randall","Pierce, Lisa"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Schroeder, Robert Charles"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2022-01-12T21:45:42Z","2021-07-20","2021-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teaching of English Sec Lang"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Second Language Acquisition","Applications","Duolingo","HelloTalk","Evaluation","Survey","Focus on Form","Communicative Language","Noticing","Gamification","Learner Motivation","Level Appropriateness"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2021 Robert Schroeder"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113036"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This study performs an evaluation of two language learning apps using established SLA principles and user-feedback through a survey and interviews. A survey asking users about level appropriateness, focus on form, Zone of Proximal Development and scaffolding, interaction, communicative language, noticing, and motivation and gamification was administered and followed up by interviews for details. Results showed that users generally rated Duolingo well in most capacities with its strongest factor being vocabulary for specific contexts and scenarios, but that the app was rarely rated as excellent in any category because of oversimplified grammar instruction, poor focus on form in terms of pronunciation, and some aspects of the app that lead to user frustration. HelloTalk however was often rated evenly across categories and ratings or in some cases had users give opposite or scattered ratings, with the general defining factor in satisfaction being whether the user found a reliable and helpful language exchange. Implications of these findings for app developers and app users is discussed in the conclusion.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2022-01-12 without embargo terms","The student, Robert Schroeder, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-13 at 12:03.","The student, Robert Schroeder, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2021-07-13 at 12:24.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2021-07-20 at 10:00.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16903 on 2022-01-12 at 12:45:19","Made available in DSpace on 2022-01-12T21:45:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SCHROEDER-THESIS-2021.pdf: 1752937 bytes, checksum: 0ffcbf7c1fc8f31ba0d6e0650b8cfdc3 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 4a5cfff0b59308372e04a560beefa0fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-07-20"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Duolingo and HelloTalk: analyzing and evaluating language learning applications using SLA theory and user feedback"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Sadler, Randall","Pierce, Lisa"],"dc:creator":["Schroeder, Robert Charles"],"dc:date":["2022-01-12T21:45:42Z","2021-07-20","2021-08"],"dc:description":["This study performs an evaluation of two language learning apps using established SLA principles and user-feedback through a survey and interviews. A survey asking users about level appropriateness, focus on form, Zone of Proximal Development and scaffolding, interaction, communicative language, noticing, and motivation and gamification was administered and followed up by interviews for details. Results showed that users generally rated Duolingo well in most capacities with its strongest factor being vocabulary for specific contexts and scenarios, but that the app was rarely rated as excellent in any category because of oversimplified grammar instruction, poor focus on form in terms of pronunciation, and some aspects of the app that lead to user frustration. HelloTalk however was often rated evenly across categories and ratings or in some cases had users give opposite or scattered ratings, with the general defining factor in satisfaction being whether the user found a reliable and helpful language exchange. Implications of these findings for app developers and app users is discussed in the conclusion.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2022-01-12 without embargo terms","The student, Robert Schroeder, accepted the attached license on 2021-07-13 at 12:03.","The student, Robert Schroeder, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2021-07-13 at 12:24.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2021-07-20 at 10:00.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16903 on 2022-01-12 at 12:45:19","Made available in DSpace on 2022-01-12T21:45:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SCHROEDER-THESIS-2021.pdf: 1752937 bytes, checksum: 0ffcbf7c1fc8f31ba0d6e0650b8cfdc3 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 4a5cfff0b59308372e04a560beefa0fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-07-20"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113036"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2021 Robert Schroeder"],"dc:subject":["Second Language Acquisition","Applications","Duolingo","HelloTalk","Evaluation","Survey","Focus on Form","Communicative Language","Noticing","Gamification","Learner Motivation","Level Appropriateness"],"dc:title":["Duolingo and HelloTalk: analyzing and evaluating language learning applications using SLA theory and user feedback"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teaching of English Sec Lang"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z"}