{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/110780"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/110780","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Feeling good: rescuing a living tradition of interpersonal, affective ethics from empathy clichés","abstract":"In this dissertation, I examine the discourse surrounding “empathy” and what it reveals about our moral beliefs, our pedagogy, and the relationship between self and other. I will argue that the language of empathy has devolved into a series of moral platitudes that skirt ethical risk and deny deep engagement with our moral traditions. Education, particularly higher education, “proceduralizes” the self, treating the student as an evolving set of competencies often for the sake of employability. Empathy, as an already rationalized concept, is easily subsumed in this procedural logic. In empathy’s basic form, one first abstracts from the historical self, free from prejudice, to engage with the “other” from a neutral position (often by feeling as them). One then returns in an egoistic fashion, constructing a self-congratulatory identity narrative. The affective act is a type of defining knowledge of both other and self. I draw largely on the philosophical work of Charles Taylor and Hans-Georg Gadamer, as well as the empathy discourses in History Education and Study Abroad, to examine these interrelated dynamics between self, other, and moral pedagogy. I then turn to Gadamer’s hermeneutics to suggest how we might participate in a richer ethical education. Hermeneutics begins with the self as a conditioned being existing in a world with others, with prejudices that ought to be foregrounded. As we encounter others and the world we are “pulled up short.” This, like empathy, is an affective state (confusion, disorientation, fear) but one that demands reconstitution of the self, a change in horizons. To conceive of learning and educational experience as a fundamentally interpretive activity can help reinvigorate an approach to ethics that the conceptualization of empathy has reduced to cliché.","abstract_html":"In this dissertation, I examine the discourse surrounding “empathy” and what it reveals about our moral beliefs, our pedagogy, and the relationship between self and other. I will argue that the language of empathy has devolved into a series of moral platitudes that skirt ethical risk and deny deep engagement with our moral traditions. Education, particularly higher education, “proceduralizes” the self, treating the student as an evolving set of competencies often for the sake of employability. Empathy, as an already rationalized concept, is easily subsumed in this procedural logic. In empathy’s basic form, one first abstracts from the historical self, free from prejudice, to engage with the “other” from a neutral position (often by feeling as them). One then returns in an egoistic fashion, constructing a self-congratulatory identity narrative. The affective act is a type of defining knowledge of both other and self. I draw largely on the philosophical work of Charles Taylor and Hans-Georg Gadamer, as well as the empathy discourses in History Education and Study Abroad, to examine these interrelated dynamics between self, other, and moral pedagogy. I then turn to Gadamer’s hermeneutics to suggest how we might participate in a richer ethical education. Hermeneutics begins with the self as a conditioned being existing in a world with others, with prejudices that ought to be foregrounded. As we encounter others and the world we are “pulled up short.” This, like empathy, is an affective state (confusion, disorientation, fear) but one that demands reconstitution of the self, a change in horizons. To conceive of learning and educational experience as a fundamentally interpretive activity can help reinvigorate an approach to ethics that the conceptualization of empathy has reduced to cliché.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Friedman, Roman"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Policy Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Burbules, Nicholas","Higgins, Chris","Dhillon, Pradeep","Mann, Jay"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-09-17T04:03:59Z","date_published":"2021-09-17T04:03:59Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z","subjects":["empathy","emotion","philosophy","moral education","Charles Taylor","Hans-Georg Gadamer","education abroad","study abroad","ethics","pedagogy","education","social studies"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2021 Roman Friedman"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110780","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Burbules, Nicholas","Higgins, Chris","Dhillon, Pradeep","Mann, Jay"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Friedman, Roman"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-09-17T04:03:59Z","2023-09-17T04:07:01Z","2021-03-18","2021-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Policy Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["empathy","emotion","philosophy","moral education","Charles Taylor","Hans-Georg Gadamer","education abroad","study abroad","ethics","pedagogy","education","social studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2021 Roman Friedman"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110780"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["In this dissertation, I examine the discourse surrounding “empathy” and what it reveals about our moral beliefs, our pedagogy, and the relationship between self and other. I will argue that the language of empathy has devolved into a series of moral platitudes that skirt ethical risk and deny deep engagement with our moral traditions. Education, particularly higher education, “proceduralizes” the self, treating the student as an evolving set of competencies often for the sake of employability. Empathy, as an already rationalized concept, is easily subsumed in this procedural logic. In empathy’s basic form, one first abstracts from the historical self, free from prejudice, to engage with the “other” from a neutral position (often by feeling as them). One then returns in an egoistic fashion, constructing a self-congratulatory identity narrative. The affective act is a type of defining knowledge of both other and self. I draw largely on the philosophical work of Charles Taylor and Hans-Georg Gadamer, as well as the empathy discourses in History Education and Study Abroad, to examine these interrelated dynamics between self, other, and moral pedagogy. I then turn to Gadamer’s hermeneutics to suggest how we might participate in a richer ethical education. Hermeneutics begins with the self as a conditioned being existing in a world with others, with prejudices that ought to be foregrounded. As we encounter others and the world we are “pulled up short.” This, like empathy, is an affective state (confusion, disorientation, fear) but one that demands reconstitution of the self, a change in horizons. To conceive of learning and educational experience as a fundamentally interpretive activity can help reinvigorate an approach to ethics that the conceptualization of empathy has reduced to cliché.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2023-05-01","The student, Roman Friedman, accepted the attached license on 2021-03-16 at 13:20.","The student, Roman Friedman, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-03-16 at 13:32.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-03-18 at 06:23.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16197 on 2021-09-16 at 20:07:12","Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-17T04:03:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 FRIEDMAN-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 1256578 bytes, checksum: d60bd6946c396d845a437b8a3ff6b006 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 3c2f9fae165a92c7094c8468dabcf388 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-03-18","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 118625 Lift date: 2023-09-17T04:04:53Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 118625 Lift date: 2023-09-17T04:07:01Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Feeling good: rescuing a living tradition of interpersonal, affective ethics from empathy clichés"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Burbules, Nicholas","Higgins, Chris","Dhillon, Pradeep","Mann, Jay"],"dc:creator":["Friedman, Roman"],"dc:date":["2021-09-17T04:03:59Z","2023-09-17T04:07:01Z","2021-03-18","2021-05"],"dc:description":["In this dissertation, I examine the discourse surrounding “empathy” and what it reveals about our moral beliefs, our pedagogy, and the relationship between self and other. I will argue that the language of empathy has devolved into a series of moral platitudes that skirt ethical risk and deny deep engagement with our moral traditions. Education, particularly higher education, “proceduralizes” the self, treating the student as an evolving set of competencies often for the sake of employability. Empathy, as an already rationalized concept, is easily subsumed in this procedural logic. In empathy’s basic form, one first abstracts from the historical self, free from prejudice, to engage with the “other” from a neutral position (often by feeling as them). One then returns in an egoistic fashion, constructing a self-congratulatory identity narrative. The affective act is a type of defining knowledge of both other and self. I draw largely on the philosophical work of Charles Taylor and Hans-Georg Gadamer, as well as the empathy discourses in History Education and Study Abroad, to examine these interrelated dynamics between self, other, and moral pedagogy. I then turn to Gadamer’s hermeneutics to suggest how we might participate in a richer ethical education. Hermeneutics begins with the self as a conditioned being existing in a world with others, with prejudices that ought to be foregrounded. As we encounter others and the world we are “pulled up short.” This, like empathy, is an affective state (confusion, disorientation, fear) but one that demands reconstitution of the self, a change in horizons. To conceive of learning and educational experience as a fundamentally interpretive activity can help reinvigorate an approach to ethics that the conceptualization of empathy has reduced to cliché.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2023-05-01","The student, Roman Friedman, accepted the attached license on 2021-03-16 at 13:20.","The student, Roman Friedman, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-03-16 at 13:32.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-03-18 at 06:23.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16197 on 2021-09-16 at 20:07:12","Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-17T04:03:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 FRIEDMAN-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 1256578 bytes, checksum: d60bd6946c396d845a437b8a3ff6b006 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 3c2f9fae165a92c7094c8468dabcf388 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-03-18","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 118625 Lift date: 2023-09-17T04:04:53Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 118625 Lift date: 2023-09-17T04:07:01Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110780"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2021 Roman Friedman"],"dc:subject":["empathy","emotion","philosophy","moral education","Charles Taylor","Hans-Georg Gadamer","education abroad","study abroad","ethics","pedagogy","education","social studies"],"dc:title":["Feeling good: rescuing a living tradition of interpersonal, affective ethics from empathy clichés"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Policy Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z"}