{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/110650"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/110650","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Educating for faithful pluralism","abstract":"Different educational philosophies offer different responses to the challenges of living and educating in the midst of deep pluralism. Yet many common responses to pluralism fall short of the ‘principled pluralism test,’ which states that an adequate response to pluralism must enable us both to hold true to our own principles and to make gracious space for others to hold true to their own. In this dissertation, I critique both a liberal approach to education for pluralism, which asks students to stand at a critical distance from their own commitments (whether religious or otherwise) in order to live with others who hold different commitments, and three strategies for responding to the fact of increasing pluralism commonly found among contemporary American Christians: 1) seeking to defend the historic Christian faith and dominate the cultural and political spheres; 2) pursuing relevance to the broader culture yet at the potential cost of assimilating and losing their distinctiveness; or 3) separating from the broader culture and withdrawing into Christian enclaves. Although each strategy contains genuine insights, it is also subject to significant shortcomings, and so ultimately fails to offer an adequate response to pluralism. I advocate instead of an approach to education for pluralism based on faithfulness – digging deep into the resources that students’ commitments afford for living well with others. Specifically, a faithfulness-based approach to pluralism requires vertical faithfulness (to a Being or set of principles that transcends ordinary human concerns and capabilities), horizontal faithfulness (to one’s faith community, to neighbors and a neighborhood, and to the long work of building a society together), and meta-faithfulness (to the very possibility of living together despite our deep differences). In the case of Christian education, sustaining such faithfulness requires not only living but also educating in the midst of the tensions between affirmation and antithesis, between engagement and distinctness, and between humility and hope. In the final chapter of my dissertation, I suggest several ways that Christian families and communities can engage in education for faithful pluralism: through practices of distinctively Christian worship; through practices of speech that prioritize silence and listening as well as a dialogue across differences; and through practices of both giving and receiving hospitality.","abstract_html":"Different educational philosophies offer different responses to the challenges of living and educating in the midst of deep pluralism. Yet many common responses to pluralism fall short of the ‘principled pluralism test,’ which states that an adequate response to pluralism must enable us both to hold true to our own principles and to make gracious space for others to hold true to their own. In this dissertation, I critique both a liberal approach to education for pluralism, which asks students to stand at a critical distance from their own commitments (whether religious or otherwise) in order to live with others who hold different commitments, and three strategies for responding to the fact of increasing pluralism commonly found among contemporary American Christians: 1) seeking to defend the historic Christian faith and dominate the cultural and political spheres; 2) pursuing relevance to the broader culture yet at the potential cost of assimilating and losing their distinctiveness; or 3) separating from the broader culture and withdrawing into Christian enclaves. Although each strategy contains genuine insights, it is also subject to significant shortcomings, and so ultimately fails to offer an adequate response to pluralism. I advocate instead of an approach to education for pluralism based on faithfulness – digging deep into the resources that students’ commitments afford for living well with others. Specifically, a faithfulness-based approach to pluralism requires vertical faithfulness (to a Being or set of principles that transcends ordinary human concerns and capabilities), horizontal faithfulness (to one’s faith community, to neighbors and a neighborhood, and to the long work of building a society together), and meta-faithfulness (to the very possibility of living together despite our deep differences). In the case of Christian education, sustaining such faithfulness requires not only living but also educating in the midst of the tensions between affirmation and antithesis, between engagement and distinctness, and between humility and hope. In the final chapter of my dissertation, I suggest several ways that Christian families and communities can engage in education for faithful pluralism: through practices of distinctively Christian worship; through practices of speech that prioritize silence and listening as well as a dialogue across differences; and through practices of both giving and receiving hospitality.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wenneborg, Emily G."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Burbules, Nicholas C.","Higgins, Chris","Ebel, Jonathan H.","Hoiem, Elizabeth","O'Gorman, Ned"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-09-17T02:34:22Z","date_published":"2021-09-17T02:34:22Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z","subjects":["pluralism","liberalism","philosophy of education","religion and education","American Christianity","neo-Calvinism","Christian education"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2021 Emily G. Wenneborg"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110650","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Burbules, Nicholas C.","Higgins, Chris","Ebel, Jonathan H.","Hoiem, Elizabeth","O'Gorman, Ned"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wenneborg, Emily G."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-09-17T02:34:22Z","2023-09-17T02:34:57Z","2021-04-12","2021-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["pluralism","liberalism","philosophy of education","religion and education","American Christianity","neo-Calvinism","Christian education"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2021 Emily G. Wenneborg"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110650"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Different educational philosophies offer different responses to the challenges of living and educating in the midst of deep pluralism. Yet many common responses to pluralism fall short of the ‘principled pluralism test,’ which states that an adequate response to pluralism must enable us both to hold true to our own principles and to make gracious space for others to hold true to their own. In this dissertation, I critique both a liberal approach to education for pluralism, which asks students to stand at a critical distance from their own commitments (whether religious or otherwise) in order to live with others who hold different commitments, and three strategies for responding to the fact of increasing pluralism commonly found among contemporary American Christians: 1) seeking to defend the historic Christian faith and dominate the cultural and political spheres; 2) pursuing relevance to the broader culture yet at the potential cost of assimilating and losing their distinctiveness; or 3) separating from the broader culture and withdrawing into Christian enclaves. Although each strategy contains genuine insights, it is also subject to significant shortcomings, and so ultimately fails to offer an adequate response to pluralism. I advocate instead of an approach to education for pluralism based on faithfulness – digging deep into the resources that students’ commitments afford for living well with others. Specifically, a faithfulness-based approach to pluralism requires vertical faithfulness (to a Being or set of principles that transcends ordinary human concerns and capabilities), horizontal faithfulness (to one’s faith community, to neighbors and a neighborhood, and to the long work of building a society together), and meta-faithfulness (to the very possibility of living together despite our deep differences). In the case of Christian education, sustaining such faithfulness requires not only living but also educating in the midst of the tensions between affirmation and antithesis, between engagement and distinctness, and between humility and hope. In the final chapter of my dissertation, I suggest several ways that Christian families and communities can engage in education for faithful pluralism: through practices of distinctively Christian worship; through practices of speech that prioritize silence and listening as well as a dialogue across differences; and through practices of both giving and receiving hospitality.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-05-01","The student, Emily Wenneborg, accepted the attached license on 2021-04-09 at 17:08.","The student, Emily Wenneborg, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-04-09 at 17:16.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-04-12 at 15:26.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16272 on 2021-09-16 at 17:02:46","Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-17T02:34:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 WENNEBORG-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 1776551 bytes, checksum: 6dfbcb3ff2c944eeab8bef9fb5798746 (MD5) Wenneborg dissertation to Grad College.docx: 776671 bytes, checksum: d1618dabdab3902be63d4d9f9f70a3e0 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: c0a40db9151b4a091bb3c091c53437b4 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4558 bytes, checksum: 92e031fab0613b4fc16b28cd01e37c38 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-04-12","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 118493 Lift date: 2023-09-17T02:34:57Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Educating for faithful pluralism"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Burbules, Nicholas C.","Higgins, Chris","Ebel, Jonathan H.","Hoiem, Elizabeth","O'Gorman, Ned"],"dc:creator":["Wenneborg, Emily G."],"dc:date":["2021-09-17T02:34:22Z","2023-09-17T02:34:57Z","2021-04-12","2021-05"],"dc:description":["Different educational philosophies offer different responses to the challenges of living and educating in the midst of deep pluralism. Yet many common responses to pluralism fall short of the ‘principled pluralism test,’ which states that an adequate response to pluralism must enable us both to hold true to our own principles and to make gracious space for others to hold true to their own. In this dissertation, I critique both a liberal approach to education for pluralism, which asks students to stand at a critical distance from their own commitments (whether religious or otherwise) in order to live with others who hold different commitments, and three strategies for responding to the fact of increasing pluralism commonly found among contemporary American Christians: 1) seeking to defend the historic Christian faith and dominate the cultural and political spheres; 2) pursuing relevance to the broader culture yet at the potential cost of assimilating and losing their distinctiveness; or 3) separating from the broader culture and withdrawing into Christian enclaves. Although each strategy contains genuine insights, it is also subject to significant shortcomings, and so ultimately fails to offer an adequate response to pluralism. I advocate instead of an approach to education for pluralism based on faithfulness – digging deep into the resources that students’ commitments afford for living well with others. Specifically, a faithfulness-based approach to pluralism requires vertical faithfulness (to a Being or set of principles that transcends ordinary human concerns and capabilities), horizontal faithfulness (to one’s faith community, to neighbors and a neighborhood, and to the long work of building a society together), and meta-faithfulness (to the very possibility of living together despite our deep differences). In the case of Christian education, sustaining such faithfulness requires not only living but also educating in the midst of the tensions between affirmation and antithesis, between engagement and distinctness, and between humility and hope. In the final chapter of my dissertation, I suggest several ways that Christian families and communities can engage in education for faithful pluralism: through practices of distinctively Christian worship; through practices of speech that prioritize silence and listening as well as a dialogue across differences; and through practices of both giving and receiving hospitality.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-05-01","The student, Emily Wenneborg, accepted the attached license on 2021-04-09 at 17:08.","The student, Emily Wenneborg, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2021-04-09 at 17:16.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2021-04-12 at 15:26.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16272 on 2021-09-16 at 17:02:46","Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-17T02:34:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 WENNEBORG-DISSERTATION-2021.pdf: 1776551 bytes, checksum: 6dfbcb3ff2c944eeab8bef9fb5798746 (MD5) Wenneborg dissertation to Grad College.docx: 776671 bytes, checksum: d1618dabdab3902be63d4d9f9f70a3e0 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: c0a40db9151b4a091bb3c091c53437b4 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4558 bytes, checksum: 92e031fab0613b4fc16b28cd01e37c38 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-04-12","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 118493 Lift date: 2023-09-17T02:34:57Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110650"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2021 Emily G. Wenneborg"],"dc:subject":["pluralism","liberalism","philosophy of education","religion and education","American Christianity","neo-Calvinism","Christian education"],"dc:title":["Educating for faithful pluralism"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:52Z"}