{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/110507"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/110507","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Insights on an automated fall detection device designed for older adult wheelchair and scooter users: a qualitative study","abstract":"This study examined the desired specifications, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of a fall detection device (FDD) among 15 older adults who use wheelchairs and scooters through remote semi-structured interviews. Participants (mean age: 67.5  4.7 years) lived with a variety of disabilities including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, stroke, osteoarthritis and spina bifida. Participants were asked about certain design features of a potential FDD. The interview examined features such as charging specifications, device use, who will be notified when a fall occurs (notification settings), the functionality of the sensor, and what instructions are provided on how to use the FDD. Participants were also asked to provide feedback on the form of the device, such as a watch, necklace (pendant), pin, or another form of their preference. Additionally, researchers examined the challenges participants had with their current technology (such as difficulty don/doffing wearable technology, charging the device, etc.). Participant responses were analyzed through thematic analysis and reported upon categories of device features, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Results indicated that participants prefer a wireless charger, watch model, and the option to toggle between which contacts are notified in the events of a fall. Participants identified challenges in charging devices due to limited fine motor skills and the difficulties of plugging in a wired charger. Participants preferred a watch model as it may not draw attention and go unnoticed as an FDD. Participants wanted to be able to change who is notified in the event of a fall, depending on the availability of the contact. Overall, participants believed an automated FDD would be useful and easy to use. Participants’ insights will inform the design of an FDD to increase usability and prevent technology abandonment. Future research should focus on user system usability to determine the effectiveness and benefits of an automated FDD.","abstract_html":"This study examined the desired specifications, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of a fall detection device (FDD) among 15 older adults who use wheelchairs and scooters through remote semi-structured interviews. Participants (mean age: 67.5  4.7 years) lived with a variety of disabilities including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, stroke, osteoarthritis and spina bifida. Participants were asked about certain design features of a potential FDD. The interview examined features such as charging specifications, device use, who will be notified when a fall occurs (notification settings), the functionality of the sensor, and what instructions are provided on how to use the FDD. Participants were also asked to provide feedback on the form of the device, such as a watch, necklace (pendant), pin, or another form of their preference. Additionally, researchers examined the challenges participants had with their current technology (such as difficulty don/doffing wearable technology, charging the device, etc.). Participant responses were analyzed through thematic analysis and reported upon categories of device features, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Results indicated that participants prefer a wireless charger, watch model, and the option to toggle between which contacts are notified in the events of a fall. Participants identified challenges in charging devices due to limited fine motor skills and the difficulties of plugging in a wired charger. Participants preferred a watch model as it may not draw attention and go unnoticed as an FDD. Participants wanted to be able to change who is notified in the event of a fall, depending on the availability of the contact. Overall, participants believed an automated FDD would be useful and easy to use. Participants’ insights will inform the design of an FDD to increase usability and prevent technology abandonment. Future research should focus on user system usability to determine the effectiveness and benefits of an automated FDD.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fliflet, Alexander Michael"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Kinesiology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Rice, Laura A","Rogers, Wendy A"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-09-17T01:11:04Z","date_published":"2021-09-17T01:11:04Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z","subjects":["fall detection device","assistive technology","wheelchair user","qualitative"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2021 Alexander Fliflet"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110507","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Rice, Laura A","Rogers, Wendy A"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fliflet, Alexander Michael"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-09-17T01:11:04Z","2021-04-23","2021-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Kinesiology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["fall detection device","assistive technology","wheelchair user","qualitative"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2021 Alexander Fliflet"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110507"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This study examined the desired specifications, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of a fall detection device (FDD) among 15 older adults who use wheelchairs and scooters through remote semi-structured interviews. Participants (mean age: 67.5  4.7 years) lived with a variety of disabilities including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, stroke, osteoarthritis and spina bifida. Participants were asked about certain design features of a potential FDD. The interview examined features such as charging specifications, device use, who will be notified when a fall occurs (notification settings), the functionality of the sensor, and what instructions are provided on how to use the FDD. Participants were also asked to provide feedback on the form of the device, such as a watch, necklace (pendant), pin, or another form of their preference. Additionally, researchers examined the challenges participants had with their current technology (such as difficulty don/doffing wearable technology, charging the device, etc.). Participant responses were analyzed through thematic analysis and reported upon categories of device features, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Results indicated that participants prefer a wireless charger, watch model, and the option to toggle between which contacts are notified in the events of a fall. Participants identified challenges in charging devices due to limited fine motor skills and the difficulties of plugging in a wired charger. Participants preferred a watch model as it may not draw attention and go unnoticed as an FDD. Participants wanted to be able to change who is notified in the event of a fall, depending on the availability of the contact. Overall, participants believed an automated FDD would be useful and easy to use. Participants’ insights will inform the design of an FDD to increase usability and prevent technology abandonment. Future research should focus on user system usability to determine the effectiveness and benefits of an automated FDD.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2021-09-16 without embargo terms","The student, Alexander Fliflet, accepted the attached license on 2021-04-19 at 15:37.","The student, Alexander Fliflet, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2021-04-19 at 15:46.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2021-04-23 at 10:41.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16419 on 2021-09-16 at 16:43:26","Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-17T01:11:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 FLIFLET-THESIS-2021.pdf: 663920 bytes, checksum: 9d43569bc367ffc8755703c2a88b8200 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4214 bytes, checksum: 42d38e9000ed1916a90f5e02bccac593 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-04-23"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Insights on an automated fall detection device designed for older adult wheelchair and scooter users: a qualitative study"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Rice, Laura A","Rogers, Wendy A"],"dc:creator":["Fliflet, Alexander Michael"],"dc:date":["2021-09-17T01:11:04Z","2021-04-23","2021-05"],"dc:description":["This study examined the desired specifications, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of a fall detection device (FDD) among 15 older adults who use wheelchairs and scooters through remote semi-structured interviews. Participants (mean age: 67.5  4.7 years) lived with a variety of disabilities including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, stroke, osteoarthritis and spina bifida. Participants were asked about certain design features of a potential FDD. The interview examined features such as charging specifications, device use, who will be notified when a fall occurs (notification settings), the functionality of the sensor, and what instructions are provided on how to use the FDD. Participants were also asked to provide feedback on the form of the device, such as a watch, necklace (pendant), pin, or another form of their preference. Additionally, researchers examined the challenges participants had with their current technology (such as difficulty don/doffing wearable technology, charging the device, etc.). Participant responses were analyzed through thematic analysis and reported upon categories of device features, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Results indicated that participants prefer a wireless charger, watch model, and the option to toggle between which contacts are notified in the events of a fall. Participants identified challenges in charging devices due to limited fine motor skills and the difficulties of plugging in a wired charger. Participants preferred a watch model as it may not draw attention and go unnoticed as an FDD. Participants wanted to be able to change who is notified in the event of a fall, depending on the availability of the contact. Overall, participants believed an automated FDD would be useful and easy to use. Participants’ insights will inform the design of an FDD to increase usability and prevent technology abandonment. Future research should focus on user system usability to determine the effectiveness and benefits of an automated FDD.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2021-09-16 without embargo terms","The student, Alexander Fliflet, accepted the attached license on 2021-04-19 at 15:37.","The student, Alexander Fliflet, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2021-04-19 at 15:46.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2021-04-23 at 10:41.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16419 on 2021-09-16 at 16:43:26","Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-17T01:11:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 FLIFLET-THESIS-2021.pdf: 663920 bytes, checksum: 9d43569bc367ffc8755703c2a88b8200 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4214 bytes, checksum: 42d38e9000ed1916a90f5e02bccac593 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-04-23"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/110507"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2021 Alexander Fliflet"],"dc:subject":["fall detection device","assistive technology","wheelchair user","qualitative"],"dc:title":["Insights on an automated fall detection device designed for older adult wheelchair and scooter users: a qualitative study"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Kinesiology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z"}