{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/109518"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/109518","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Configuration and control in social media systems","abstract":"Social media is an important means for interaction, but one that is increasingly curated by automated systems that aim to intelligently infer user intentions. This dissertation studies how users experience different mechanisms to configure and control these automated systems. Three sets of experiments, combining surveys, interviews, and participatory design workshops, seek to triangulate how users experience these mechanisms for control. We find that one prevalent mechanism, control settings, improves user satisfaction, but they do so whether or not they are functioning. Despite that, however, users describe turning to improvisational behaviors rather than control settings to see what they want on their news feeds. A second mechanism for control, appeals of content moderation decisions, does not improve user perceptions of the fairness, trustworthiness or accountability of the system, despite user calls for human review of automated decisions. These existing mechanisms appear to fall short of users’ needs. As a result, we explore a newly proposed mechanism for control – contestability, whereby systems are designed so that users can shape and influence decision-making processes. We find that when everyday users envision this, they require substantial (and currently absent) support in the form of representation, argumentation, access and compassion from platforms. While this dissertation identifies few easy solutions for the challenges of automated systems for social media, it calls for renewed attention the importance of control as a design feature.","abstract_html":"Social media is an important means for interaction, but one that is increasingly curated by automated systems that aim to intelligently infer user intentions. This dissertation studies how users experience different mechanisms to configure and control these automated systems. Three sets of experiments, combining surveys, interviews, and participatory design workshops, seek to triangulate how users experience these mechanisms for control. We find that one prevalent mechanism, control settings, improves user satisfaction, but they do so whether or not they are functioning. Despite that, however, users describe turning to improvisational behaviors rather than control settings to see what they want on their news feeds. A second mechanism for control, appeals of content moderation decisions, does not improve user perceptions of the fairness, trustworthiness or accountability of the system, despite user calls for human review of automated decisions. These existing mechanisms appear to fall short of users’ needs. As a result, we explore a newly proposed mechanism for control – contestability, whereby systems are designed so that users can shape and influence decision-making processes. We find that when everyday users envision this, they require substantial (and currently absent) support in the form of representation, argumentation, access and compassion from platforms. While this dissertation identifies few easy solutions for the challenges of automated systems for social media, it calls for renewed attention the importance of control as a design feature.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Vaccaro, Kristen"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Computer Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Karahalios, Karrie","Hamilton, Kevin","Koyejo, Sanmi","Sundaram, Hari","Sandvig, Christian"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-03-05T21:42:46Z","date_published":"2021-03-05T21:42:46Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z","subjects":["social computing","algorithmic experience"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2020 Kristen Vaccaro"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109518","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Karahalios, Karrie","Hamilton, Kevin","Koyejo, Sanmi","Sundaram, Hari","Sandvig, Christian"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Vaccaro, Kristen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-03-05T21:42:46Z","2023-03-05T21:43:00Z","2020-12-02","2020-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Computer Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["social computing","algorithmic experience"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2020 Kristen Vaccaro"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109518"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Social media is an important means for interaction, but one that is increasingly curated by automated systems that aim to intelligently infer user intentions. This dissertation studies how users experience different mechanisms to configure and control these automated systems. Three sets of experiments, combining surveys, interviews, and participatory design workshops, seek to triangulate how users experience these mechanisms for control. We find that one prevalent mechanism, control settings, improves user satisfaction, but they do so whether or not they are functioning. Despite that, however, users describe turning to improvisational behaviors rather than control settings to see what they want on their news feeds. A second mechanism for control, appeals of content moderation decisions, does not improve user perceptions of the fairness, trustworthiness or accountability of the system, despite user calls for human review of automated decisions. These existing mechanisms appear to fall short of users’ needs. As a result, we explore a newly proposed mechanism for control – contestability, whereby systems are designed so that users can shape and influence decision-making processes. We find that when everyday users envision this, they require substantial (and currently absent) support in the form of representation, argumentation, access and compassion from platforms. While this dissertation identifies few easy solutions for the challenges of automated systems for social media, it calls for renewed attention the importance of control as a design feature.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2022-12-01","The student, Kristen Vaccaro, accepted the attached license on 2020-12-01 at 11:36.","The student, Kristen Vaccaro, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-12-01 at 11:42.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-12-02 at 09:12.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16009 on 2021-03-04 at 16:20:17","Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-05T21:42:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 VACCARO-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 8510547 bytes, checksum: db9a2c1ba54f71da28c4604480bc6f51 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 8032e8acc14230f3f91c96b1636f74a2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-12-02","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 117223 Lift date: 2023-03-05T21:43:00Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Configuration and control in social media systems"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Karahalios, Karrie","Hamilton, Kevin","Koyejo, Sanmi","Sundaram, Hari","Sandvig, Christian"],"dc:creator":["Vaccaro, Kristen"],"dc:date":["2021-03-05T21:42:46Z","2023-03-05T21:43:00Z","2020-12-02","2020-12"],"dc:description":["Social media is an important means for interaction, but one that is increasingly curated by automated systems that aim to intelligently infer user intentions. This dissertation studies how users experience different mechanisms to configure and control these automated systems. Three sets of experiments, combining surveys, interviews, and participatory design workshops, seek to triangulate how users experience these mechanisms for control. We find that one prevalent mechanism, control settings, improves user satisfaction, but they do so whether or not they are functioning. Despite that, however, users describe turning to improvisational behaviors rather than control settings to see what they want on their news feeds. A second mechanism for control, appeals of content moderation decisions, does not improve user perceptions of the fairness, trustworthiness or accountability of the system, despite user calls for human review of automated decisions. These existing mechanisms appear to fall short of users’ needs. As a result, we explore a newly proposed mechanism for control – contestability, whereby systems are designed so that users can shape and influence decision-making processes. We find that when everyday users envision this, they require substantial (and currently absent) support in the form of representation, argumentation, access and compassion from platforms. While this dissertation identifies few easy solutions for the challenges of automated systems for social media, it calls for renewed attention the importance of control as a design feature.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2022-12-01","The student, Kristen Vaccaro, accepted the attached license on 2020-12-01 at 11:36.","The student, Kristen Vaccaro, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-12-01 at 11:42.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-12-02 at 09:12.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16009 on 2021-03-04 at 16:20:17","Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-05T21:42:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 VACCARO-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 8510547 bytes, checksum: db9a2c1ba54f71da28c4604480bc6f51 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 8032e8acc14230f3f91c96b1636f74a2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-12-02","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 117223 Lift date: 2023-03-05T21:43:00Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109518"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2020 Kristen Vaccaro"],"dc:subject":["social computing","algorithmic experience"],"dc:title":["Configuration and control in social media systems"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Computer Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z"}