{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/109488"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/109488","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Course design for online art education: A case of the quality matters standards applied to a drawing class","abstract":"This thesis evaluates the Quality Matters rubric standards for improving online drawing courses. Findings include general effectiveness, positive perceptions from faculty, and suggestions for improvement for the Quality Matters standards for designing studio art courses. This study contributes to gaps in the literature about course design techniques for online studio art courses and content specific investigations of the Quality Matters standards. The methods include a case study with a review of student artwork and a questionnaire of key faculty informants. Additionally, this study codes the data for the strengths and weaknesses of Quality Matters. From the coding, a synthesis of the themes that emerged is presented in the section on findings. The salient themes that arose related to the examination are enhanced student experience, emphasis on student learning, quality of student artwork, issues of the design phase, suggestions for the QM standards, faculty perceptions, and technology issues. The concluding chapter answers the main question, 'How effective are the Quality Matters standards for online studio art course design?' offering suggestions for further study and presenting ideas for improvement to the Quality Matters standards.","abstract_html":"This thesis evaluates the Quality Matters rubric standards for improving online drawing courses. Findings include general effectiveness, positive perceptions from faculty, and suggestions for improvement for the Quality Matters standards for designing studio art courses. This study contributes to gaps in the literature about course design techniques for online studio art courses and content specific investigations of the Quality Matters standards. The methods include a case study with a review of student artwork and a questionnaire of key faculty informants. Additionally, this study codes the data for the strengths and weaknesses of Quality Matters. From the coding, a synthesis of the themes that emerged is presented in the section on findings. The salient themes that arose related to the examination are enhanced student experience, emphasis on student learning, quality of student artwork, issues of the design phase, suggestions for the QM standards, faculty perceptions, and technology issues. The concluding chapter answers the main question, 'How effective are the Quality Matters standards for online studio art course design?' offering suggestions for further study and presenting ideas for improvement to the Quality Matters standards.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Conn, Michael Randall"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ed.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Cope, Bill","Kalantzis, Mary","Montebello, Matthew","Dhillon, Pradeep"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-03-05T21:40:42Z","date_published":"2021-03-05T21:40:42Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z","subjects":["Quality Matters","Art Education","Drawing","Online Education","Course Design","Case Study","Thematic Analysis","History of Art Education","Constructivism","Rubric","Community College","Online Drawing"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["© 2020 Michael Randall Conn"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109488","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Cope, Bill","Kalantzis, Mary","Montebello, Matthew","Dhillon, Pradeep"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Conn, Michael Randall"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-03-05T21:40:42Z","2023-03-05T21:43:00Z","2020-11-17","2020-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Quality Matters","Art Education","Drawing","Online Education","Course Design","Case Study","Thematic Analysis","History of Art Education","Constructivism","Rubric","Community College","Online Drawing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© 2020 Michael Randall Conn"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109488"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis evaluates the Quality Matters rubric standards for improving online drawing courses. Findings include general effectiveness, positive perceptions from faculty, and suggestions for improvement for the Quality Matters standards for designing studio art courses. This study contributes to gaps in the literature about course design techniques for online studio art courses and content specific investigations of the Quality Matters standards. The methods include a case study with a review of student artwork and a questionnaire of key faculty informants. Additionally, this study codes the data for the strengths and weaknesses of Quality Matters. From the coding, a synthesis of the themes that emerged is presented in the section on findings. The salient themes that arose related to the examination are enhanced student experience, emphasis on student learning, quality of student artwork, issues of the design phase, suggestions for the QM standards, faculty perceptions, and technology issues. The concluding chapter answers the main question, 'How effective are the Quality Matters standards for online studio art course design?' offering suggestions for further study and presenting ideas for improvement to the Quality Matters standards.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2022-12-01","The student, Michael Conn, accepted the attached license on 2020-11-12 at 07:53.","The student, Michael Conn, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-11-12 at 09:06.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-11-17 at 16:55.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #15872 on 2021-03-04 at 16:19:26","Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-05T21:40:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 CONN-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 16885993 bytes, checksum: 0f3f6e5e41c9194af903e726ac9834d8 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 93fe2204bd836739ba568039d8ab6488 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-11-17","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 117192 Lift date: 2023-03-05T21:40:52Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 117192 Lift date: 2023-03-05T21:43:00Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Course design for online art education: A case of the quality matters standards applied to a drawing class"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Cope, Bill","Kalantzis, Mary","Montebello, Matthew","Dhillon, Pradeep"],"dc:creator":["Conn, Michael Randall"],"dc:date":["2021-03-05T21:40:42Z","2023-03-05T21:43:00Z","2020-11-17","2020-12"],"dc:description":["This thesis evaluates the Quality Matters rubric standards for improving online drawing courses. Findings include general effectiveness, positive perceptions from faculty, and suggestions for improvement for the Quality Matters standards for designing studio art courses. This study contributes to gaps in the literature about course design techniques for online studio art courses and content specific investigations of the Quality Matters standards. The methods include a case study with a review of student artwork and a questionnaire of key faculty informants. Additionally, this study codes the data for the strengths and weaknesses of Quality Matters. From the coding, a synthesis of the themes that emerged is presented in the section on findings. The salient themes that arose related to the examination are enhanced student experience, emphasis on student learning, quality of student artwork, issues of the design phase, suggestions for the QM standards, faculty perceptions, and technology issues. The concluding chapter answers the main question, 'How effective are the Quality Matters standards for online studio art course design?' offering suggestions for further study and presenting ideas for improvement to the Quality Matters standards.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2022-12-01","The student, Michael Conn, accepted the attached license on 2020-11-12 at 07:53.","The student, Michael Conn, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-11-12 at 09:06.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-11-17 at 16:55.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #15872 on 2021-03-04 at 16:19:26","Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-05T21:40:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 CONN-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 16885993 bytes, checksum: 0f3f6e5e41c9194af903e726ac9834d8 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 93fe2204bd836739ba568039d8ab6488 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-11-17","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 117192 Lift date: 2023-03-05T21:40:52Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 117192 Lift date: 2023-03-05T21:43:00Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109488"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["© 2020 Michael Randall Conn"],"dc:subject":["Quality Matters","Art Education","Drawing","Online Education","Course Design","Case Study","Thematic Analysis","History of Art Education","Constructivism","Rubric","Community College","Online Drawing"],"dc:title":["Course design for online art education: A case of the quality matters standards applied to a drawing class"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z"}