{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/109423"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/109423","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Design thinking for school improvement toward deeper learning","abstract":"This qualitative phenomenological interview study examined the experiences of principals who completed Stanford University d.school’s School Retool fellowship program for school leaders, which focused on using the design thinking process for school improvement toward deeper learning. This research project explored the leadership practices and tools used by principals toward deeper learning. To better understand this phenomenon, the Coherence Framework (Fullan & Quinn, 2015), which includes the elements of focusing direction, cultivating collaborative cultures, deepening learning, and securing accountability, was used to frame the study and analyze the findings. This study addressed the following research questions: a) How do pre-K-12 principals use design thinking for school improvement and b) How, if at all, do principals see design thinking practices as a tool that can impact deeper learning of students from different backgrounds? Thirteen principals from across the United States were selected for this study. Virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted as the primary data source. Findings indicated a strong relationship between the beliefs and practices used by principals when implementing design thinking, making it difficult to disentangle the findings and emergent themes between the two research questions. Overall findings of the study suggested: principals’ leadership styles, takeaways from professional learning, and beliefs influence how they view and utilize the design thinking approach; principals use design thinking tools, artifacts, and mindsets for school improvement; participants worked to foster collaborative communities; and principals attempted to use empathy to build equitable practice. This study provided evidence that principals can use design thinking tools and practices for school improvement toward deeper learning, using the resources that schools already have. Implications from this study suggested that principals play a significant role in fostering collaboration within the school community through learning leadership and that principals facilitate professional learning around design thinking in different ways, including through formal and informal structures such as scheduling and supervisory practices, hiring practices, and the mindsets that they modeled. Like principals, school district leaders can influence ow people engage with design thinking through the professional learning they facilitate and/or support, as well as the formal and informal structures that they put into place. This study suggests that School Retool directors and local collaboratives additional explicit instruction related to building equity is needed for principals. Recommendations for policy and practice are addressed and highlight the need for principals to have clearly defined visions related to student learning goals prior to implementing design thinking. Additionally, it is recommended that principals complete training with a faculty member to increase buy-in and that principals utilize an enhanced version of the design thinking process to build equitable practices within their schools to support students from different backgrounds. It is recommended that state policymakers fund research on different types of professional learning for school leaders, such as design thinking, which focuses on student outcome data. Recommendations for future research address and highlight the need for additional studies to identify findings related to principal practices, teacher practices, and student outcomes.","abstract_html":"This qualitative phenomenological interview study examined the experiences of principals who completed Stanford University d.school’s School Retool fellowship program for school leaders, which focused on using the design thinking process for school improvement toward deeper learning. This research project explored the leadership practices and tools used by principals toward deeper learning. To better understand this phenomenon, the Coherence Framework (Fullan & Quinn, 2015), which includes the elements of focusing direction, cultivating collaborative cultures, deepening learning, and securing accountability, was used to frame the study and analyze the findings. This study addressed the following research questions: a) How do pre-K-12 principals use design thinking for school improvement and b) How, if at all, do principals see design thinking practices as a tool that can impact deeper learning of students from different backgrounds? Thirteen principals from across the United States were selected for this study. Virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted as the primary data source. Findings indicated a strong relationship between the beliefs and practices used by principals when implementing design thinking, making it difficult to disentangle the findings and emergent themes between the two research questions. Overall findings of the study suggested: principals’ leadership styles, takeaways from professional learning, and beliefs influence how they view and utilize the design thinking approach; principals use design thinking tools, artifacts, and mindsets for school improvement; participants worked to foster collaborative communities; and principals attempted to use empathy to build equitable practice. This study provided evidence that principals can use design thinking tools and practices for school improvement toward deeper learning, using the resources that schools already have. Implications from this study suggested that principals play a significant role in fostering collaboration within the school community through learning leadership and that principals facilitate professional learning around design thinking in different ways, including through formal and informal structures such as scheduling and supervisory practices, hiring practices, and the mindsets that they modeled. Like principals, school district leaders can influence ow people engage with design thinking through the professional learning they facilitate and/or support, as well as the formal and informal structures that they put into place. This study suggests that School Retool directors and local collaboratives additional explicit instruction related to building equity is needed for principals. Recommendations for policy and practice are addressed and highlight the need for principals to have clearly defined visions related to student learning goals prior to implementing design thinking. Additionally, it is recommended that principals complete training with a faculty member to increase buy-in and that principals utilize an enhanced version of the design thinking process to build equitable practices within their schools to support students from different backgrounds. It is recommended that state policymakers fund research on different types of professional learning for school leaders, such as design thinking, which focuses on student outcome data. Recommendations for future research address and highlight the need for additional studies to identify findings related to principal practices, teacher practices, and student outcomes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Vonder Haar, Kristin Marie"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ed.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Roegman, Rachel","Hackmann, Donald","Herrmann, Mary","Kalantzis, Mary"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-03-05T21:38:18Z","date_published":"2021-03-05T21:38:18Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z","subjects":["design thinking","school improvement","design process","deeper learning","SIP","DL","DT","coherence framework","principals"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2020 Kristin Vonder Haar"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109423","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Roegman, Rachel","Hackmann, Donald","Herrmann, Mary","Kalantzis, Mary"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Vonder Haar, Kristin Marie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-03-05T21:38:18Z","2020-12-03","2020-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["design thinking","school improvement","design process","deeper learning","SIP","DL","DT","coherence framework","principals"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2020 Kristin Vonder Haar"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109423"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This qualitative phenomenological interview study examined the experiences of principals who completed Stanford University d.school’s School Retool fellowship program for school leaders, which focused on using the design thinking process for school improvement toward deeper learning. This research project explored the leadership practices and tools used by principals toward deeper learning. To better understand this phenomenon, the Coherence Framework (Fullan & Quinn, 2015), which includes the elements of focusing direction, cultivating collaborative cultures, deepening learning, and securing accountability, was used to frame the study and analyze the findings. This study addressed the following research questions: a) How do pre-K-12 principals use design thinking for school improvement and b) How, if at all, do principals see design thinking practices as a tool that can impact deeper learning of students from different backgrounds? Thirteen principals from across the United States were selected for this study. Virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted as the primary data source. Findings indicated a strong relationship between the beliefs and practices used by principals when implementing design thinking, making it difficult to disentangle the findings and emergent themes between the two research questions. Overall findings of the study suggested: principals’ leadership styles, takeaways from professional learning, and beliefs influence how they view and utilize the design thinking approach; principals use design thinking tools, artifacts, and mindsets for school improvement; participants worked to foster collaborative communities; and principals attempted to use empathy to build equitable practice. This study provided evidence that principals can use design thinking tools and practices for school improvement toward deeper learning, using the resources that schools already have. Implications from this study suggested that principals play a significant role in fostering collaboration within the school community through learning leadership and that principals facilitate professional learning around design thinking in different ways, including through formal and informal structures such as scheduling and supervisory practices, hiring practices, and the mindsets that they modeled. Like principals, school district leaders can influence ow people engage with design thinking through the professional learning they facilitate and/or support, as well as the formal and informal structures that they put into place. This study suggests that School Retool directors and local collaboratives additional explicit instruction related to building equity is needed for principals. Recommendations for policy and practice are addressed and highlight the need for principals to have clearly defined visions related to student learning goals prior to implementing design thinking. Additionally, it is recommended that principals complete training with a faculty member to increase buy-in and that principals utilize an enhanced version of the design thinking process to build equitable practices within their schools to support students from different backgrounds. It is recommended that state policymakers fund research on different types of professional learning for school leaders, such as design thinking, which focuses on student outcome data. Recommendations for future research address and highlight the need for additional studies to identify findings related to principal practices, teacher practices, and student outcomes.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2021-03-04 without embargo terms","The student, Kristin Vonder Haar, accepted the attached license on 2020-12-02 at 09:58.","The student, Kristin Vonder Haar, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-12-02 at 10:06.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-12-03 at 13:39.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16029 on 2021-03-04 at 15:35:54","Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-05T21:38:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 VONDERHAAR-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 3727591 bytes, checksum: 7b6d01f91bea0387666aed1afa765fa2 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4216 bytes, checksum: b6b3bf0fd3727d810fb803ff3efaea21 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4562 bytes, checksum: e99b318c2a200f35704c231da85c3213 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-12-03"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Design thinking for school improvement toward deeper learning"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Roegman, Rachel","Hackmann, Donald","Herrmann, Mary","Kalantzis, Mary"],"dc:creator":["Vonder Haar, Kristin Marie"],"dc:date":["2021-03-05T21:38:18Z","2020-12-03","2020-12"],"dc:description":["This qualitative phenomenological interview study examined the experiences of principals who completed Stanford University d.school’s School Retool fellowship program for school leaders, which focused on using the design thinking process for school improvement toward deeper learning. This research project explored the leadership practices and tools used by principals toward deeper learning. To better understand this phenomenon, the Coherence Framework (Fullan & Quinn, 2015), which includes the elements of focusing direction, cultivating collaborative cultures, deepening learning, and securing accountability, was used to frame the study and analyze the findings. This study addressed the following research questions: a) How do pre-K-12 principals use design thinking for school improvement and b) How, if at all, do principals see design thinking practices as a tool that can impact deeper learning of students from different backgrounds? Thirteen principals from across the United States were selected for this study. Virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted as the primary data source. Findings indicated a strong relationship between the beliefs and practices used by principals when implementing design thinking, making it difficult to disentangle the findings and emergent themes between the two research questions. Overall findings of the study suggested: principals’ leadership styles, takeaways from professional learning, and beliefs influence how they view and utilize the design thinking approach; principals use design thinking tools, artifacts, and mindsets for school improvement; participants worked to foster collaborative communities; and principals attempted to use empathy to build equitable practice. This study provided evidence that principals can use design thinking tools and practices for school improvement toward deeper learning, using the resources that schools already have. Implications from this study suggested that principals play a significant role in fostering collaboration within the school community through learning leadership and that principals facilitate professional learning around design thinking in different ways, including through formal and informal structures such as scheduling and supervisory practices, hiring practices, and the mindsets that they modeled. Like principals, school district leaders can influence ow people engage with design thinking through the professional learning they facilitate and/or support, as well as the formal and informal structures that they put into place. This study suggests that School Retool directors and local collaboratives additional explicit instruction related to building equity is needed for principals. Recommendations for policy and practice are addressed and highlight the need for principals to have clearly defined visions related to student learning goals prior to implementing design thinking. Additionally, it is recommended that principals complete training with a faculty member to increase buy-in and that principals utilize an enhanced version of the design thinking process to build equitable practices within their schools to support students from different backgrounds. It is recommended that state policymakers fund research on different types of professional learning for school leaders, such as design thinking, which focuses on student outcome data. Recommendations for future research address and highlight the need for additional studies to identify findings related to principal practices, teacher practices, and student outcomes.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2021-03-04 without embargo terms","The student, Kristin Vonder Haar, accepted the attached license on 2020-12-02 at 09:58.","The student, Kristin Vonder Haar, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-12-02 at 10:06.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-12-03 at 13:39.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16029 on 2021-03-04 at 15:35:54","Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-05T21:38:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 VONDERHAAR-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 3727591 bytes, checksum: 7b6d01f91bea0387666aed1afa765fa2 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4216 bytes, checksum: b6b3bf0fd3727d810fb803ff3efaea21 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4562 bytes, checksum: e99b318c2a200f35704c231da85c3213 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-12-03"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/109423"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2020 Kristin Vonder Haar"],"dc:subject":["design thinking","school improvement","design process","deeper learning","SIP","DL","DT","coherence framework","principals"],"dc:title":["Design thinking for school improvement toward deeper learning"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educ Policy, Orgzn & Leadrshp"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:50Z"}