{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/108649"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/108649","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Implicit abandonment distress","abstract":"Although the cognitive revolution has brought mental processes (including implicit processes) back into psychological science, psychodynamic theory continues to be criticized as adhering to models of psychopathology that cannot lead to testable predictions and knowledge accumulation (Hoffart & Johnson, 2017). According to these critics, in a dynamic perspective, observable indicators of distress and the hypothetical internal mechanism (or “latent entity”) presumed to cause these symptoms are defined in such a way that they cannot be disentangled from each other. The current research aimed to address this issue by conceptualizing the internal mechanism as a relational schema. Focusing on a relational schema of abandonment, it presents an account of a memory mechanism that can be measured independently of its behavioral manifestations (i.e., symptoms of distress). In Study 1, an implicit memory script measure, psychophysiological data, and video capture of behavioral response were used to test the causal relationship between schema activation and symptoms of distress. In Study 2, the actual components of the schema were investigated through a Stroop task that aimed to elucidate how self-other representations of abandonment are connected in memory. The implicit memory script measure was found to be a better predictor of implicit emotional arousal than any explicit schema measure. By contrast, the explicit schema measures were better predictors of observed behavioral responses. Both kinds of schema measures were associated with significant differences in participant reactions to a non-rejection stimulus rather than a rejection stimulus, and the representational content associated with abandonment distress did not appear to be organized in terms of discrete self-other meaning elements. Overall, the findings suggest that situations in which the meaning of a relational event is open to interpretation may be highly relevant to how schemas work.","abstract_html":"Although the cognitive revolution has brought mental processes (including implicit processes) back into psychological science, psychodynamic theory continues to be criticized as adhering to models of psychopathology that cannot lead to testable predictions and knowledge accumulation (Hoffart & Johnson, 2017). According to these critics, in a dynamic perspective, observable indicators of distress and the hypothetical internal mechanism (or “latent entity”) presumed to cause these symptoms are defined in such a way that they cannot be disentangled from each other. The current research aimed to address this issue by conceptualizing the internal mechanism as a relational schema. Focusing on a relational schema of abandonment, it presents an account of a memory mechanism that can be measured independently of its behavioral manifestations (i.e., symptoms of distress). In Study 1, an implicit memory script measure, psychophysiological data, and video capture of behavioral response were used to test the causal relationship between schema activation and symptoms of distress. In Study 2, the actual components of the schema were investigated through a Stroop task that aimed to elucidate how self-other representations of abandonment are connected in memory. The implicit memory script measure was found to be a better predictor of implicit emotional arousal than any explicit schema measure. By contrast, the explicit schema measures were better predictors of observed behavioral responses. Both kinds of schema measures were associated with significant differences in participant reactions to a non-rejection stimulus rather than a rejection stimulus, and the representational content associated with abandonment distress did not appear to be organized in terms of discrete self-other meaning elements. Overall, the findings suggest that situations in which the meaning of a relational event is open to interpretation may be highly relevant to how schemas work.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Thomas, Joel G"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dolcos, Florin","Heller, Wendy","Berenbaum, Howard","Hund, Anita","Bost, Kelly"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-10-07T22:48:02Z","date_published":"2020-10-07T22:48:02Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:48Z","subjects":["relational schema","unconscious emotion","abandonment","attachment","borderline personality disorder","mechanism"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2020 Joel Thomas"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/108649","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dolcos, Florin","Heller, Wendy","Berenbaum, Howard","Hund, Anita","Bost, Kelly"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Thomas, Joel G"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2020-10-07T22:48:02Z","2022-10-07T22:50:13Z","2019-12-02","2020-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["relational schema","unconscious emotion","abandonment","attachment","borderline personality disorder","mechanism"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2020 Joel Thomas"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/108649"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Although the cognitive revolution has brought mental processes (including implicit processes) back into psychological science, psychodynamic theory continues to be criticized as adhering to models of psychopathology that cannot lead to testable predictions and knowledge accumulation (Hoffart & Johnson, 2017). According to these critics, in a dynamic perspective, observable indicators of distress and the hypothetical internal mechanism (or “latent entity”) presumed to cause these symptoms are defined in such a way that they cannot be disentangled from each other. The current research aimed to address this issue by conceptualizing the internal mechanism as a relational schema. Focusing on a relational schema of abandonment, it presents an account of a memory mechanism that can be measured independently of its behavioral manifestations (i.e., symptoms of distress). In Study 1, an implicit memory script measure, psychophysiological data, and video capture of behavioral response were used to test the causal relationship between schema activation and symptoms of distress. In Study 2, the actual components of the schema were investigated through a Stroop task that aimed to elucidate how self-other representations of abandonment are connected in memory. The implicit memory script measure was found to be a better predictor of implicit emotional arousal than any explicit schema measure. By contrast, the explicit schema measures were better predictors of observed behavioral responses. Both kinds of schema measures were associated with significant differences in participant reactions to a non-rejection stimulus rather than a rejection stimulus, and the representational content associated with abandonment distress did not appear to be organized in terms of discrete self-other meaning elements. Overall, the findings suggest that situations in which the meaning of a relational event is open to interpretation may be highly relevant to how schemas work.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2022-08-01","The student, Joel Thomas, accepted the attached license on 2019-11-14 at 12:24.","The student, Joel Thomas, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-11-14 at 12:36.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-12-02 at 11:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14550 on 2020-10-02 at 15:48:43","Made available in DSpace on 2020-10-07T22:48:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 THOMAS-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 10740876 bytes, checksum: df6c024ba504a459a6dd99d4c159ea73 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: 5430a0f8d9d59fa347d8823130bdc000 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-12-02","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 116277 Lift date: 2022-10-07T22:48:14Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 116277 Lift date: 2022-10-07T22:50:13Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Implicit abandonment distress"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dolcos, Florin","Heller, Wendy","Berenbaum, Howard","Hund, Anita","Bost, Kelly"],"dc:creator":["Thomas, Joel G"],"dc:date":["2020-10-07T22:48:02Z","2022-10-07T22:50:13Z","2019-12-02","2020-08"],"dc:description":["Although the cognitive revolution has brought mental processes (including implicit processes) back into psychological science, psychodynamic theory continues to be criticized as adhering to models of psychopathology that cannot lead to testable predictions and knowledge accumulation (Hoffart & Johnson, 2017). According to these critics, in a dynamic perspective, observable indicators of distress and the hypothetical internal mechanism (or “latent entity”) presumed to cause these symptoms are defined in such a way that they cannot be disentangled from each other. The current research aimed to address this issue by conceptualizing the internal mechanism as a relational schema. Focusing on a relational schema of abandonment, it presents an account of a memory mechanism that can be measured independently of its behavioral manifestations (i.e., symptoms of distress). In Study 1, an implicit memory script measure, psychophysiological data, and video capture of behavioral response were used to test the causal relationship between schema activation and symptoms of distress. In Study 2, the actual components of the schema were investigated through a Stroop task that aimed to elucidate how self-other representations of abandonment are connected in memory. The implicit memory script measure was found to be a better predictor of implicit emotional arousal than any explicit schema measure. By contrast, the explicit schema measures were better predictors of observed behavioral responses. Both kinds of schema measures were associated with significant differences in participant reactions to a non-rejection stimulus rather than a rejection stimulus, and the representational content associated with abandonment distress did not appear to be organized in terms of discrete self-other meaning elements. Overall, the findings suggest that situations in which the meaning of a relational event is open to interpretation may be highly relevant to how schemas work.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2022-08-01","The student, Joel Thomas, accepted the attached license on 2019-11-14 at 12:24.","The student, Joel Thomas, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-11-14 at 12:36.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-12-02 at 11:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14550 on 2020-10-02 at 15:48:43","Made available in DSpace on 2020-10-07T22:48:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 THOMAS-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 10740876 bytes, checksum: df6c024ba504a459a6dd99d4c159ea73 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: 5430a0f8d9d59fa347d8823130bdc000 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-12-02","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 116277 Lift date: 2022-10-07T22:48:14Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 116277 Lift date: 2022-10-07T22:50:13Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/108649"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2020 Joel Thomas"],"dc:subject":["relational schema","unconscious emotion","abandonment","attachment","borderline personality disorder","mechanism"],"dc:title":["Implicit abandonment distress"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:48Z"}