{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/107955"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/107955","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Teacher evaluation policy reforms involving student data: Teachers’ perceptions","abstract":"This study explored the perceptions of elementary school teachers in two Illinois public schools who have been evaluated using student test data. One school used a student learning objective approach and one school used an all-in approach. The theoretical framework for this study was relational trust. The research questions were: (a) To what extent do Illinois public school teachers who are evaluated using student learning objective and all-in student growth approaches perceive the processes to be understandable, fair, and valid? (b) To what extent have these student growth approaches influenced their professional practice? (c) How does the principal’s approach to teacher evaluation during the student growth component of the evaluation influence teachers’ professional development? In order to answer these questions, a qualitative interview study was conducted. Two principals and nine teachers were interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended interviews. Three main findings emerged after the interviews were coded and analyzed. First, teachers at the SLO school had a more positive view of the student growth model at their school than teachers at the all-in school. Teachers at the all-in school reported that the student growth model influenced their professional practice more than teachers at the SLO school. Both principals maintained a high level of trust with their teachers through the process by exhibiting competence and integrity and demonstrating care and respect for their teachers.","abstract_html":"This study explored the perceptions of elementary school teachers in two Illinois public schools who have been evaluated using student test data. One school used a student learning objective approach and one school used an all-in approach. The theoretical framework for this study was relational trust. The research questions were: (a) To what extent do Illinois public school teachers who are evaluated using student learning objective and all-in student growth approaches perceive the processes to be understandable, fair, and valid? (b) To what extent have these student growth approaches influenced their professional practice? (c) How does the principal’s approach to teacher evaluation during the student growth component of the evaluation influence teachers’ professional development? In order to answer these questions, a qualitative interview study was conducted. Two principals and nine teachers were interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended interviews. Three main findings emerged after the interviews were coded and analyzed. First, teachers at the SLO school had a more positive view of the student growth model at their school than teachers at the all-in school. Teachers at the all-in school reported that the student growth model influenced their professional practice more than teachers at the SLO school. Both principals maintained a high level of trust with their teachers through the process by exhibiting competence and integrity and demonstrating care and respect for their teachers.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Weidner, Emily Anna"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ed.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Ed Organization and Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Roegman, Rachel","Shriner, James","Herrmann, Mary","Welton, Anjale"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-08-26T21:54:43Z","date_published":"2020-08-26T21:54:43Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:47Z","subjects":["teacher evaluation"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2020 Emily Weidner"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/107955","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Roegman, Rachel","Shriner, James","Herrmann, Mary","Welton, Anjale"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Weidner, Emily Anna"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2020-08-26T21:54:43Z","2020-05-01","2020-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text","Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Ed Organization and Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["teacher evaluation"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2020 Emily Weidner"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/107955"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This study explored the perceptions of elementary school teachers in two Illinois public schools who have been evaluated using student test data. One school used a student learning objective approach and one school used an all-in approach. The theoretical framework for this study was relational trust. The research questions were: (a) To what extent do Illinois public school teachers who are evaluated using student learning objective and all-in student growth approaches perceive the processes to be understandable, fair, and valid? (b) To what extent have these student growth approaches influenced their professional practice? (c) How does the principal’s approach to teacher evaluation during the student growth component of the evaluation influence teachers’ professional development? In order to answer these questions, a qualitative interview study was conducted. Two principals and nine teachers were interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended interviews. Three main findings emerged after the interviews were coded and analyzed. First, teachers at the SLO school had a more positive view of the student growth model at their school than teachers at the all-in school. Teachers at the all-in school reported that the student growth model influenced their professional practice more than teachers at the SLO school. Both principals maintained a high level of trust with their teachers through the process by exhibiting competence and integrity and demonstrating care and respect for their teachers.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2020-08-25 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Weidner, accepted the attached license on 2020-05-01 at 10:58.","The student, Emily Weidner, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-05-01 at 11:07.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-05-01 at 14:47.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #15142 on 2020-08-25 at 17:10:24","Made available in DSpace on 2020-08-26T21:54:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 WEIDNER-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 604707 bytes, checksum: 3757845da5631bb568f5f9f01ace2ac2 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 5ffcb430b88410a9b3a89e946b2927ea (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4556 bytes, checksum: 40cdaf6a1e46a9159ffd5ce170a0e5c5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-05-01"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Teacher evaluation policy reforms involving student data: Teachers’ perceptions"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Roegman, Rachel","Shriner, James","Herrmann, Mary","Welton, Anjale"],"dc:creator":["Weidner, Emily Anna"],"dc:date":["2020-08-26T21:54:43Z","2020-05-01","2020-05"],"dc:description":["This study explored the perceptions of elementary school teachers in two Illinois public schools who have been evaluated using student test data. One school used a student learning objective approach and one school used an all-in approach. The theoretical framework for this study was relational trust. The research questions were: (a) To what extent do Illinois public school teachers who are evaluated using student learning objective and all-in student growth approaches perceive the processes to be understandable, fair, and valid? (b) To what extent have these student growth approaches influenced their professional practice? (c) How does the principal’s approach to teacher evaluation during the student growth component of the evaluation influence teachers’ professional development? In order to answer these questions, a qualitative interview study was conducted. Two principals and nine teachers were interviewed using semi-structured, open-ended interviews. Three main findings emerged after the interviews were coded and analyzed. First, teachers at the SLO school had a more positive view of the student growth model at their school than teachers at the all-in school. Teachers at the all-in school reported that the student growth model influenced their professional practice more than teachers at the SLO school. Both principals maintained a high level of trust with their teachers through the process by exhibiting competence and integrity and demonstrating care and respect for their teachers.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2020-08-25 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Weidner, accepted the attached license on 2020-05-01 at 10:58.","The student, Emily Weidner, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2020-05-01 at 11:07.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2020-05-01 at 14:47.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #15142 on 2020-08-25 at 17:10:24","Made available in DSpace on 2020-08-26T21:54:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 WEIDNER-DISSERTATION-2020.pdf: 604707 bytes, checksum: 3757845da5631bb568f5f9f01ace2ac2 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 5ffcb430b88410a9b3a89e946b2927ea (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4556 bytes, checksum: 40cdaf6a1e46a9159ffd5ce170a0e5c5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-05-01"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/107955"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2020 Emily Weidner"],"dc:subject":["teacher evaluation"],"dc:title":["Teacher evaluation policy reforms involving student data: Teachers’ perceptions"],"dc:type":["text","Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Ed Organization and Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:47Z"}