{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/106205"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/106205","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Model selection in rheology: Providing a practical framework, surveying the field, and assessing the uses and limitations of BIC","abstract":"The selection of which model or models to use when studying a complex fluid is of constant relevance in rheology, though often too little attention is paid to framing this problem of selection such as to yield consistent, credible, and meaningful results. In this thesis I provide a novel framework for identifying the purpose of rheological models along with background on model selection techniques and criteria, assess the state of and need for model selection in rheological literature, and perform several case studies investigating how model selection techniques may be applied in rheology and note their advantages and limitations. While there remains no single, straightforward technique for selecting a model in all cases, the rheological literature so rarely acknowledges this crucial step in analysis and often fails to sufficiently report methodology relating to model fits, let alone selection, that even preliminary consideration of this problem and the application of simple criteria such as the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) may add significant value and validity to these analyses. There remains even greater opportunity in the application of more sophisticated methods such as the calculation of Bayes Factors and the formulation of priors for rheological models. The background, review, case studies, and examples presented in this thesis provide a jumping-off point for an ongoing discussion regarding the place of these theories and techniques in rheology while offering clear examples of their use and conclusions that may be drawn from them.","abstract_html":"The selection of which model or models to use when studying a complex fluid is of constant relevance in rheology, though often too little attention is paid to framing this problem of selection such as to yield consistent, credible, and meaningful results. In this thesis I provide a novel framework for identifying the purpose of rheological models along with background on model selection techniques and criteria, assess the state of and need for model selection in rheological literature, and perform several case studies investigating how model selection techniques may be applied in rheology and note their advantages and limitations. While there remains no single, straightforward technique for selecting a model in all cases, the rheological literature so rarely acknowledges this crucial step in analysis and often fails to sufficiently report methodology relating to model fits, let alone selection, that even preliminary consideration of this problem and the application of simple criteria such as the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) may add significant value and validity to these analyses. There remains even greater opportunity in the application of more sophisticated methods such as the calculation of Bayes Factors and the formulation of priors for rheological models. The background, review, case studies, and examples presented in this thesis provide a jumping-off point for an ongoing discussion regarding the place of these theories and techniques in rheology while offering clear examples of their use and conclusions that may be drawn from them.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Margotta, Anthony S."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Theoretical & Applied Mechans","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Ewoldt, Randy H."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-03-02T21:58:14Z","date_published":"2020-03-02T21:58:14Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z","subjects":["rheology","model selection","yield stress","thixotropy","model fit","bayesian","least-squares fitting"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Anthony S. Margotta"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106205","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Ewoldt, Randy H."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Margotta, Anthony S."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2020-03-02T21:58:14Z","2019-11-25","2019-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Theoretical & Applied Mechans"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["rheology","model selection","yield stress","thixotropy","model fit","bayesian","least-squares fitting"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Anthony S. Margotta"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106205"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The selection of which model or models to use when studying a complex fluid is of constant relevance in rheology, though often too little attention is paid to framing this problem of selection such as to yield consistent, credible, and meaningful results. In this thesis I provide a novel framework for identifying the purpose of rheological models along with background on model selection techniques and criteria, assess the state of and need for model selection in rheological literature, and perform several case studies investigating how model selection techniques may be applied in rheology and note their advantages and limitations. While there remains no single, straightforward technique for selecting a model in all cases, the rheological literature so rarely acknowledges this crucial step in analysis and often fails to sufficiently report methodology relating to model fits, let alone selection, that even preliminary consideration of this problem and the application of simple criteria such as the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) may add significant value and validity to these analyses. There remains even greater opportunity in the application of more sophisticated methods such as the calculation of Bayes Factors and the formulation of priors for rheological models. The background, review, case studies, and examples presented in this thesis provide a jumping-off point for an ongoing discussion regarding the place of these theories and techniques in rheology while offering clear examples of their use and conclusions that may be drawn from them.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2020-02-28 without embargo terms","The student, Anthony Margotta, accepted the attached license on 2019-11-22 at 15:10.","The student, Anthony Margotta, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2019-11-22 at 15:17.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2019-11-25 at 13:35.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14594 on 2020-02-28 at 17:14:03","Made available in DSpace on 2020-03-02T21:58:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 MARGOTTA-THESIS-2019.pdf: 971047 bytes, checksum: 3ccc15f5c48ffa43d85852db7abd0735 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 71eac975cd189f20df9a22b6653ec0d9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-11-25"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Model selection in rheology: Providing a practical framework, surveying the field, and assessing the uses and limitations of BIC"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Ewoldt, Randy H."],"dc:creator":["Margotta, Anthony S."],"dc:date":["2020-03-02T21:58:14Z","2019-11-25","2019-12"],"dc:description":["The selection of which model or models to use when studying a complex fluid is of constant relevance in rheology, though often too little attention is paid to framing this problem of selection such as to yield consistent, credible, and meaningful results. In this thesis I provide a novel framework for identifying the purpose of rheological models along with background on model selection techniques and criteria, assess the state of and need for model selection in rheological literature, and perform several case studies investigating how model selection techniques may be applied in rheology and note their advantages and limitations. While there remains no single, straightforward technique for selecting a model in all cases, the rheological literature so rarely acknowledges this crucial step in analysis and often fails to sufficiently report methodology relating to model fits, let alone selection, that even preliminary consideration of this problem and the application of simple criteria such as the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) may add significant value and validity to these analyses. There remains even greater opportunity in the application of more sophisticated methods such as the calculation of Bayes Factors and the formulation of priors for rheological models. The background, review, case studies, and examples presented in this thesis provide a jumping-off point for an ongoing discussion regarding the place of these theories and techniques in rheology while offering clear examples of their use and conclusions that may be drawn from them.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2020-02-28 without embargo terms","The student, Anthony Margotta, accepted the attached license on 2019-11-22 at 15:10.","The student, Anthony Margotta, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2019-11-22 at 15:17.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2019-11-25 at 13:35.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14594 on 2020-02-28 at 17:14:03","Made available in DSpace on 2020-03-02T21:58:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 MARGOTTA-THESIS-2019.pdf: 971047 bytes, checksum: 3ccc15f5c48ffa43d85852db7abd0735 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 71eac975cd189f20df9a22b6653ec0d9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-11-25"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106205"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Anthony S. Margotta"],"dc:subject":["rheology","model selection","yield stress","thixotropy","model fit","bayesian","least-squares fitting"],"dc:title":["Model selection in rheology: Providing a practical framework, surveying the field, and assessing the uses and limitations of BIC"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Theoretical & Applied Mechans"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z"}