{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/106180"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/106180","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Forms of disciplinary fragmentation: Holistic healthcare and the categorical division of academic labor","abstract":"This dissertation approaches holistic healthcare as a problem of disciplinarity in that it articulates a challenge with which any holistic endeavor, however conceived, would invariably contend. I call this challenge disciplinary fragmentation. The understanding of disciplinary fragmentation given by the dissertation is informed by the Biglan model of subject matter difference. Appearing in 1973 as a tool to study the organization of the research university, the model formalized a system of subject matter classification that hinges on three pairs of oppositions: 1) applied-pure, 2) hard-soft, 3) life-non-life. The model’s creator, psychologist Anthony Biglan, postulated the existence of cognitive styles drawn along these lines. Conceiving disciplinary fragmentation as the theoretical splitting of cognitive styles into these categories, the dissertation asks what would consolidate the styles and how could they pose unforeseen obstacles to the flourishing of more holistic approaches in mainstream medicine. The answer it gives involves medical textbooks, learning objectives, electronic medical records, cultural competence training materials, peer-reviewed journal articles and several other pervasive and mundane forms that govern the three arms of mainstream medicine: patient care, research and medical education. Using a new formalist methodology, the dissertation shows how the form of these pervasive and mundane forms could enact the three pairs of Biglan oppositions postulated to underlie disciplinary fragmentation. In so doing, it renders a grounded explanation of why disciplinary fragmentation makes mainstream medicine inimical to holistic healthcare while providing concrete ways it could begin to cultivate more holistic perspectives.","abstract_html":"This dissertation approaches holistic healthcare as a problem of disciplinarity in that it articulates a challenge with which any holistic endeavor, however conceived, would invariably contend. I call this challenge disciplinary fragmentation. The understanding of disciplinary fragmentation given by the dissertation is informed by the Biglan model of subject matter difference. Appearing in 1973 as a tool to study the organization of the research university, the model formalized a system of subject matter classification that hinges on three pairs of oppositions: 1) applied-pure, 2) hard-soft, 3) life-non-life. The model’s creator, psychologist Anthony Biglan, postulated the existence of cognitive styles drawn along these lines. Conceiving disciplinary fragmentation as the theoretical splitting of cognitive styles into these categories, the dissertation asks what would consolidate the styles and how could they pose unforeseen obstacles to the flourishing of more holistic approaches in mainstream medicine. The answer it gives involves medical textbooks, learning objectives, electronic medical records, cultural competence training materials, peer-reviewed journal articles and several other pervasive and mundane forms that govern the three arms of mainstream medicine: patient care, research and medical education. Using a new formalist methodology, the dissertation shows how the form of these pervasive and mundane forms could enact the three pairs of Biglan oppositions postulated to underlie disciplinary fragmentation. In so doing, it renders a grounded explanation of why disciplinary fragmentation makes mainstream medicine inimical to holistic healthcare while providing concrete ways it could begin to cultivate more holistic perspectives.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sanders, Richard"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Comparative Literature","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hilger, Stephanie","Ceman, Stephanie","Frost, Samantha","Llano, Daniel","Mahaffey, Vicki","Murison, Justine","Wade, Mara"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-03-02T21:58:06Z","date_published":"2020-03-02T21:58:06Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z","subjects":["Disciplinarity","holistic healthcare","Biglan model"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Richard Sanders"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106180","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hilger, Stephanie","Ceman, Stephanie","Frost, Samantha","Llano, Daniel","Mahaffey, Vicki","Murison, Justine","Wade, Mara"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sanders, Richard"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2020-03-02T21:58:06Z","2019-10-29","2019-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Comparative Literature"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Disciplinarity","holistic healthcare","Biglan model"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Richard Sanders"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106180"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation approaches holistic healthcare as a problem of disciplinarity in that it articulates a challenge with which any holistic endeavor, however conceived, would invariably contend. I call this challenge disciplinary fragmentation. The understanding of disciplinary fragmentation given by the dissertation is informed by the Biglan model of subject matter difference. Appearing in 1973 as a tool to study the organization of the research university, the model formalized a system of subject matter classification that hinges on three pairs of oppositions: 1) applied-pure, 2) hard-soft, 3) life-non-life. The model’s creator, psychologist Anthony Biglan, postulated the existence of cognitive styles drawn along these lines. Conceiving disciplinary fragmentation as the theoretical splitting of cognitive styles into these categories, the dissertation asks what would consolidate the styles and how could they pose unforeseen obstacles to the flourishing of more holistic approaches in mainstream medicine. The answer it gives involves medical textbooks, learning objectives, electronic medical records, cultural competence training materials, peer-reviewed journal articles and several other pervasive and mundane forms that govern the three arms of mainstream medicine: patient care, research and medical education. Using a new formalist methodology, the dissertation shows how the form of these pervasive and mundane forms could enact the three pairs of Biglan oppositions postulated to underlie disciplinary fragmentation. In so doing, it renders a grounded explanation of why disciplinary fragmentation makes mainstream medicine inimical to holistic healthcare while providing concrete ways it could begin to cultivate more holistic perspectives.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2020-02-28 without embargo terms","The student, Richard Sanders, accepted the attached license on 2019-10-28 at 14:11.","The student, Richard Sanders, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-10-28 at 14:12.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-10-29 at 13:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14521 on 2020-02-28 at 17:13:12","Made available in DSpace on 2020-03-02T21:58:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SANDERS-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 13225117 bytes, checksum: 6da06dffadfdce792796929218a77438 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 9097f88433ada3db9e65fc371e396d36 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-10-29"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Forms of disciplinary fragmentation: Holistic healthcare and the categorical division of academic labor"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hilger, Stephanie","Ceman, Stephanie","Frost, Samantha","Llano, Daniel","Mahaffey, Vicki","Murison, Justine","Wade, Mara"],"dc:creator":["Sanders, Richard"],"dc:date":["2020-03-02T21:58:06Z","2019-10-29","2019-12"],"dc:description":["This dissertation approaches holistic healthcare as a problem of disciplinarity in that it articulates a challenge with which any holistic endeavor, however conceived, would invariably contend. I call this challenge disciplinary fragmentation. The understanding of disciplinary fragmentation given by the dissertation is informed by the Biglan model of subject matter difference. Appearing in 1973 as a tool to study the organization of the research university, the model formalized a system of subject matter classification that hinges on three pairs of oppositions: 1) applied-pure, 2) hard-soft, 3) life-non-life. The model’s creator, psychologist Anthony Biglan, postulated the existence of cognitive styles drawn along these lines. Conceiving disciplinary fragmentation as the theoretical splitting of cognitive styles into these categories, the dissertation asks what would consolidate the styles and how could they pose unforeseen obstacles to the flourishing of more holistic approaches in mainstream medicine. The answer it gives involves medical textbooks, learning objectives, electronic medical records, cultural competence training materials, peer-reviewed journal articles and several other pervasive and mundane forms that govern the three arms of mainstream medicine: patient care, research and medical education. Using a new formalist methodology, the dissertation shows how the form of these pervasive and mundane forms could enact the three pairs of Biglan oppositions postulated to underlie disciplinary fragmentation. In so doing, it renders a grounded explanation of why disciplinary fragmentation makes mainstream medicine inimical to holistic healthcare while providing concrete ways it could begin to cultivate more holistic perspectives.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2020-02-28 without embargo terms","The student, Richard Sanders, accepted the attached license on 2019-10-28 at 14:11.","The student, Richard Sanders, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-10-28 at 14:12.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-10-29 at 13:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14521 on 2020-02-28 at 17:13:12","Made available in DSpace on 2020-03-02T21:58:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SANDERS-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 13225117 bytes, checksum: 6da06dffadfdce792796929218a77438 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 9097f88433ada3db9e65fc371e396d36 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-10-29"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106180"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Richard Sanders"],"dc:subject":["Disciplinarity","holistic healthcare","Biglan model"],"dc:title":["Forms of disciplinary fragmentation: Holistic healthcare and the categorical division of academic labor"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Comparative Literature"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z"}