{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105902"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105902","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"From the arsenal of democracy to 0% financing: Promotional communication at General Motors","abstract":"This dissertation is a study of the commercial media system situated within the political economy of communication. Through a case study of General Motor’s promotional communication, this dissertation investigates how commercial propaganda, such as public relations (PR) and advertising, influence the commercial media. From 1990 to 2009, GM became a financial powerhouse through General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), its financial subsidiary. At the same time, GM increased production of SUVs. This dissertation examines how GM’s promotional communication supported these two trends. Through ads, GM sold SUVs using lucrative financial promotions. GM’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) complemented this approach by safetywashing GM’s SUVs through community programs. Thus, despite widely reported safety problems, many Americans believed SUVs to be safe. Likewise, GM used greenwashing PR and CSR to portray the corporation as environmentally conscious while lobbying against Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations. Through these PR and advertising campaigns, GM successfully countered criticism and shifted public opinion around auto safety and environmental regulations. When GM faced bankruptcy in 2009, the corporation used promotional communication to influence the debate over the auto bailout. In the years since the bailout, the auto industry remains surprisingly similar to the 1990s and 2000s. Despite their impact on consumer safety and the environment, SUVs are popular worldwide. The promotional communication tactics advanced by GM in the 1990s and 2000s continue to influence public debates over auto safety, CAFE, and the sale of SUVs.","abstract_html":"This dissertation is a study of the commercial media system situated within the political economy of communication. Through a case study of General Motor’s promotional communication, this dissertation investigates how commercial propaganda, such as public relations (PR) and advertising, influence the commercial media. From 1990 to 2009, GM became a financial powerhouse through General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), its financial subsidiary. At the same time, GM increased production of SUVs. This dissertation examines how GM’s promotional communication supported these two trends. Through ads, GM sold SUVs using lucrative financial promotions. GM’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) complemented this approach by safetywashing GM’s SUVs through community programs. Thus, despite widely reported safety problems, many Americans believed SUVs to be safe. Likewise, GM used greenwashing PR and CSR to portray the corporation as environmentally conscious while lobbying against Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations. Through these PR and advertising campaigns, GM successfully countered criticism and shifted public opinion around auto safety and environmental regulations. When GM faced bankruptcy in 2009, the corporation used promotional communication to influence the debate over the auto bailout. In the years since the bailout, the auto industry remains surprisingly similar to the 1990s and 2000s. Despite their impact on consumer safety and the environment, SUVs are popular worldwide. The promotional communication tactics advanced by GM in the 1990s and 2000s continue to influence public debates over auto safety, CAFE, and the sale of SUVs.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hebert, Mary Grace B."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["McChesney, Robert W","Stole, Inger L","Ciafone, Amanda","Oberdeck, Kathryn J"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-11-26T20:58:38Z","date_published":"2019-11-26T20:58:38Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z","subjects":["public relations","PR","political economy of communication","general motors","GM","advertising","media relations","journalism","newspapers","news","Detroit Free Press","Detroit","SUV","Sport utility vehicle","greenwashing","safetywashing","corporate social responsibility","philanthropy","corporate philanthropy","CSR","CAFE","Corporate average fuel economy","auto bailout","TARP","Troubled Asset Relief Program","GMAC","General Motors Acceptance corporation","auto industry","American auto industry","American auto manufacturers","auto-industrial complex"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Mary Grace B. Hebert"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105902","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["McChesney, Robert W","Stole, Inger L","Ciafone, Amanda","Oberdeck, Kathryn J"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hebert, Mary Grace B."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-11-26T20:58:38Z","2021-11-27T10:15:27Z","2019-07-08","2019-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["public relations","PR","political economy of communication","general motors","GM","advertising","media relations","journalism","newspapers","news","Detroit Free Press","Detroit","SUV","Sport utility vehicle","greenwashing","safetywashing","corporate social responsibility","philanthropy","corporate philanthropy","CSR","CAFE","Corporate average fuel economy","auto bailout","TARP","Troubled Asset Relief Program","GMAC","General Motors Acceptance corporation","auto industry","American auto industry","American auto manufacturers","auto-industrial complex"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Mary Grace B. Hebert"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105902"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation is a study of the commercial media system situated within the political economy of communication. Through a case study of General Motor’s promotional communication, this dissertation investigates how commercial propaganda, such as public relations (PR) and advertising, influence the commercial media. From 1990 to 2009, GM became a financial powerhouse through General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), its financial subsidiary. At the same time, GM increased production of SUVs. This dissertation examines how GM’s promotional communication supported these two trends. Through ads, GM sold SUVs using lucrative financial promotions. GM’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) complemented this approach by safetywashing GM’s SUVs through community programs. Thus, despite widely reported safety problems, many Americans believed SUVs to be safe. Likewise, GM used greenwashing PR and CSR to portray the corporation as environmentally conscious while lobbying against Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations. Through these PR and advertising campaigns, GM successfully countered criticism and shifted public opinion around auto safety and environmental regulations. When GM faced bankruptcy in 2009, the corporation used promotional communication to influence the debate over the auto bailout. In the years since the bailout, the auto industry remains surprisingly similar to the 1990s and 2000s. Despite their impact on consumer safety and the environment, SUVs are popular worldwide. The promotional communication tactics advanced by GM in the 1990s and 2000s continue to influence public debates over auto safety, CAFE, and the sale of SUVs.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Mary Grace Hebert, accepted the attached license on 2019-07-03 at 16:19.","The student, Mary Grace Hebert, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-07-03 at 16:58.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-07-08 at 16:07.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14162 on 2019-11-26 at 14:01:03","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:58:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 HEBERT-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1818771 bytes, checksum: 9137c1281faccc7dc21bbedd552a4544 (MD5) Copyright.pdf: 743842 bytes, checksum: 5511b5f9b50f9fda9ad10970ae9f725e (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4214 bytes, checksum: 732eb7699ec1a141b190d08d9dcb53ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-07-08","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113048 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113048 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 113048 on 2021-11-27T10:15:27Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["From the arsenal of democracy to 0% financing: Promotional communication at General Motors"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["McChesney, Robert W","Stole, Inger L","Ciafone, Amanda","Oberdeck, Kathryn J"],"dc:creator":["Hebert, Mary Grace B."],"dc:date":["2019-11-26T20:58:38Z","2021-11-27T10:15:27Z","2019-07-08","2019-08"],"dc:description":["This dissertation is a study of the commercial media system situated within the political economy of communication. Through a case study of General Motor’s promotional communication, this dissertation investigates how commercial propaganda, such as public relations (PR) and advertising, influence the commercial media. From 1990 to 2009, GM became a financial powerhouse through General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), its financial subsidiary. At the same time, GM increased production of SUVs. This dissertation examines how GM’s promotional communication supported these two trends. Through ads, GM sold SUVs using lucrative financial promotions. GM’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) complemented this approach by safetywashing GM’s SUVs through community programs. Thus, despite widely reported safety problems, many Americans believed SUVs to be safe. Likewise, GM used greenwashing PR and CSR to portray the corporation as environmentally conscious while lobbying against Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations. Through these PR and advertising campaigns, GM successfully countered criticism and shifted public opinion around auto safety and environmental regulations. When GM faced bankruptcy in 2009, the corporation used promotional communication to influence the debate over the auto bailout. In the years since the bailout, the auto industry remains surprisingly similar to the 1990s and 2000s. Despite their impact on consumer safety and the environment, SUVs are popular worldwide. The promotional communication tactics advanced by GM in the 1990s and 2000s continue to influence public debates over auto safety, CAFE, and the sale of SUVs.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Mary Grace Hebert, accepted the attached license on 2019-07-03 at 16:19.","The student, Mary Grace Hebert, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-07-03 at 16:58.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-07-08 at 16:07.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14162 on 2019-11-26 at 14:01:03","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:58:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 HEBERT-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1818771 bytes, checksum: 9137c1281faccc7dc21bbedd552a4544 (MD5) Copyright.pdf: 743842 bytes, checksum: 5511b5f9b50f9fda9ad10970ae9f725e (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4214 bytes, checksum: 732eb7699ec1a141b190d08d9dcb53ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-07-08","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113048 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113048 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 113048 on 2021-11-27T10:15:27Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105902"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Mary Grace B. Hebert"],"dc:subject":["public relations","PR","political economy of communication","general motors","GM","advertising","media relations","journalism","newspapers","news","Detroit Free Press","Detroit","SUV","Sport utility vehicle","greenwashing","safetywashing","corporate social responsibility","philanthropy","corporate philanthropy","CSR","CAFE","Corporate average fuel economy","auto bailout","TARP","Troubled Asset Relief Program","GMAC","General Motors Acceptance corporation","auto industry","American auto industry","American auto manufacturers","auto-industrial complex"],"dc:title":["From the arsenal of democracy to 0% financing: Promotional communication at General Motors"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z"}