{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105884"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105884","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"How are price fixing agreements unfair?","abstract":"Antitrust law is trapped in a labyrinth of its own making. The assumption that consumer welfare and efficiency is the sole concern of antitrust law conflicts with what people view as unfair about antitrust law. The present thesis advances the understanding of antitrust law by providing some theoretical considerations and empirical results of what people view as unfair regarding price-fixing agreements. People's attitudes towards price fixing were obtained through experimental surveys on Amazon Mechanical Turk in the United States. The empirical results suggest that people view it as unfair when they feel that businesses rip them off through unequal transactions, such as price fixing and other forms of collusive behavior. But there is more to it than that. The evidence also suggests that people's price-fixing attitudes vary depending on the circumstances. The empirical results suggest that people judge price fixing as a moral violation influenced by the dual entitlement principle and the double effect theory. Moreover, results suggest that people’s intuitions about price fixing are not static and move whenever the social and moral context changes.","abstract_html":"Antitrust law is trapped in a labyrinth of its own making. The assumption that consumer welfare and efficiency is the sole concern of antitrust law conflicts with what people view as unfair about antitrust law. The present thesis advances the understanding of antitrust law by providing some theoretical considerations and empirical results of what people view as unfair regarding price-fixing agreements. People's attitudes towards price fixing were obtained through experimental surveys on Amazon Mechanical Turk in the United States. The empirical results suggest that people view it as unfair when they feel that businesses rip them off through unequal transactions, such as price fixing and other forms of collusive behavior. But there is more to it than that. The evidence also suggests that people's price-fixing attitudes vary depending on the circumstances. The empirical results suggest that people judge price fixing as a moral violation influenced by the dual entitlement principle and the double effect theory. Moreover, results suggest that people’s intuitions about price fixing are not static and move whenever the social and moral context changes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Delvasto Perdomo, Carlos"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"J.S.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Law","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Lawless, Robert","Bilz, Kenworthey","Robbennolt, Jennifer K.","Ulen, Thomas"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-11-26T20:58:34Z","date_published":"2019-11-26T20:58:34Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z","subjects":["Antitrust law price-fixing agreements","moral intuitions","experimental surveys","dual entitlement theory","double effect doctrine","Price Fixing Attitude Scale."],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019, Carlos Delvasto"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105884","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Lawless, Robert","Bilz, Kenworthey","Robbennolt, Jennifer K.","Ulen, Thomas"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Delvasto Perdomo, Carlos"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-11-26T20:58:34Z","2021-11-27T10:15:27Z","2019-07-02","2019-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Law"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["J.S.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Antitrust law price-fixing agreements","moral intuitions","experimental surveys","dual entitlement theory","double effect doctrine","Price Fixing Attitude Scale."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019, Carlos Delvasto"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105884"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Antitrust law is trapped in a labyrinth of its own making. The assumption that consumer welfare and efficiency is the sole concern of antitrust law conflicts with what people view as unfair about antitrust law. The present thesis advances the understanding of antitrust law by providing some theoretical considerations and empirical results of what people view as unfair regarding price-fixing agreements. People's attitudes towards price fixing were obtained through experimental surveys on Amazon Mechanical Turk in the United States. The empirical results suggest that people view it as unfair when they feel that businesses rip them off through unequal transactions, such as price fixing and other forms of collusive behavior. But there is more to it than that. The evidence also suggests that people's price-fixing attitudes vary depending on the circumstances. The empirical results suggest that people judge price fixing as a moral violation influenced by the dual entitlement principle and the double effect theory. Moreover, results suggest that people’s intuitions about price fixing are not static and move whenever the social and moral context changes.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Carlos Delvasto Perdomo, accepted the attached license on 2019-06-28 at 13:24.","The student, Carlos Delvasto Perdomo, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-06-28 at 13:34.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-07-02 at 12:47.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14107 on 2019-11-26 at 14:00:39","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:58:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 DELVASTOPERDOMO-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1550469 bytes, checksum: f2dc539cb31938a4388b2641040ae165 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4220 bytes, checksum: 9f0e5d8cf4c9aeac43262b36fe31c118 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-07-02","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113030 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113030 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 113030 on 2021-11-27T10:15:27Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["How are price fixing agreements unfair?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Lawless, Robert","Bilz, Kenworthey","Robbennolt, Jennifer K.","Ulen, Thomas"],"dc:creator":["Delvasto Perdomo, Carlos"],"dc:date":["2019-11-26T20:58:34Z","2021-11-27T10:15:27Z","2019-07-02","2019-08"],"dc:description":["Antitrust law is trapped in a labyrinth of its own making. The assumption that consumer welfare and efficiency is the sole concern of antitrust law conflicts with what people view as unfair about antitrust law. The present thesis advances the understanding of antitrust law by providing some theoretical considerations and empirical results of what people view as unfair regarding price-fixing agreements. People's attitudes towards price fixing were obtained through experimental surveys on Amazon Mechanical Turk in the United States. The empirical results suggest that people view it as unfair when they feel that businesses rip them off through unequal transactions, such as price fixing and other forms of collusive behavior. But there is more to it than that. The evidence also suggests that people's price-fixing attitudes vary depending on the circumstances. The empirical results suggest that people judge price fixing as a moral violation influenced by the dual entitlement principle and the double effect theory. Moreover, results suggest that people’s intuitions about price fixing are not static and move whenever the social and moral context changes.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Carlos Delvasto Perdomo, accepted the attached license on 2019-06-28 at 13:24.","The student, Carlos Delvasto Perdomo, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-06-28 at 13:34.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-07-02 at 12:47.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14107 on 2019-11-26 at 14:00:39","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:58:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 DELVASTOPERDOMO-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1550469 bytes, checksum: f2dc539cb31938a4388b2641040ae165 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4220 bytes, checksum: 9f0e5d8cf4c9aeac43262b36fe31c118 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-07-02","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113030 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113030 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 113030 on 2021-11-27T10:15:27Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105884"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019, Carlos Delvasto"],"dc:subject":["Antitrust law price-fixing agreements","moral intuitions","experimental surveys","dual entitlement theory","double effect doctrine","Price Fixing Attitude Scale."],"dc:title":["How are price fixing agreements unfair?"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Law"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["J.S.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z"}