{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105863"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105863","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The duality of practices and its organizational implications: Adoption of new HR practices and consequences on innovation in Korean firms following the 1997 Asian financial crisis","abstract":"Organizations face normative pressures from institutional actors to adopt various practices. Much institutional research has offered insights about diffusion processes, decoupling, and adoptions’ implication for organizational legitimacy. However, this vast literature appears to have largely overlooked a parallel set of questions about whether and when institutionally prescribed practices deliver the intended outcomes. The questions are important given the dual nature of practices: They have both technical and institutional characteristics and serve as both tools and symbols. Such dual nature of practices has also been recognized to be accountable for unintended negative consequences of technically sound practices. Chapter 2 of my dissertation has two objectives. First, it provides needed empirical evidence about the intended consequences of institutional prescriptions in the context of Korean manufacturing firms. Following the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, Korean firms faced normative pressure to adopt a comprehensive set of new market-oriented HR practices, where the practices were intended to facilitate innovation. Based on the positive effect of the prescription found in this context, I build more general theory about the conditions under which prescriptions deliver intended outcomes. The second objective of Chapter 2 is to develop and test theory about the types of practices more or less likely to deliver intended effects. Consistent with the theory’s predictions, the results show that the prescribed practices have divergent effects on innovation. Chapter 3, which is a qualitative add-on to Chapter 2, examines the practices’ organizational ramifications and innovation outcomes through a comparative case study of four major conglomerates in Korea. By doing so, the chapter aims to provide a deeper understanding of the mechanism behind the divergent effects of the prescribed HR practices.","abstract_html":"Organizations face normative pressures from institutional actors to adopt various practices. Much institutional research has offered insights about diffusion processes, decoupling, and adoptions’ implication for organizational legitimacy. However, this vast literature appears to have largely overlooked a parallel set of questions about whether and when institutionally prescribed practices deliver the intended outcomes. The questions are important given the dual nature of practices: They have both technical and institutional characteristics and serve as both tools and symbols. Such dual nature of practices has also been recognized to be accountable for unintended negative consequences of technically sound practices. Chapter 2 of my dissertation has two objectives. First, it provides needed empirical evidence about the intended consequences of institutional prescriptions in the context of Korean manufacturing firms. Following the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, Korean firms faced normative pressure to adopt a comprehensive set of new market-oriented HR practices, where the practices were intended to facilitate innovation. Based on the positive effect of the prescription found in this context, I build more general theory about the conditions under which prescriptions deliver intended outcomes. The second objective of Chapter 2 is to develop and test theory about the types of practices more or less likely to deliver intended effects. Consistent with the theory’s predictions, the results show that the prescribed practices have divergent effects on innovation. Chapter 3, which is a qualitative add-on to Chapter 2, examines the practices’ organizational ramifications and innovation outcomes through a comparative case study of four major conglomerates in Korea. By doing so, the chapter aims to provide a deeper understanding of the mechanism behind the divergent effects of the prescribed HR practices.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lee, Seung Hoon"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Love, E. Geoffrey","Kraatz, Matthew S.","Somaya, Deepak","Schijven, Mario"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-11-26T20:58:28Z","date_published":"2019-11-26T20:58:28Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z","subjects":["Organizations' Practice Adoption","Institutional Theory"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Seung Hoon Lee"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105863","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Love, E. Geoffrey","Kraatz, Matthew S.","Somaya, Deepak","Schijven, Mario"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lee, Seung Hoon"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-11-26T20:58:28Z","2021-11-27T10:15:27Z","2019-06-19","2019-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Organizations' Practice Adoption","Institutional Theory"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Seung Hoon Lee"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105863"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Organizations face normative pressures from institutional actors to adopt various practices. Much institutional research has offered insights about diffusion processes, decoupling, and adoptions’ implication for organizational legitimacy. However, this vast literature appears to have largely overlooked a parallel set of questions about whether and when institutionally prescribed practices deliver the intended outcomes. The questions are important given the dual nature of practices: They have both technical and institutional characteristics and serve as both tools and symbols. Such dual nature of practices has also been recognized to be accountable for unintended negative consequences of technically sound practices. Chapter 2 of my dissertation has two objectives. First, it provides needed empirical evidence about the intended consequences of institutional prescriptions in the context of Korean manufacturing firms. Following the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, Korean firms faced normative pressure to adopt a comprehensive set of new market-oriented HR practices, where the practices were intended to facilitate innovation. Based on the positive effect of the prescription found in this context, I build more general theory about the conditions under which prescriptions deliver intended outcomes. The second objective of Chapter 2 is to develop and test theory about the types of practices more or less likely to deliver intended effects. Consistent with the theory’s predictions, the results show that the prescribed practices have divergent effects on innovation. Chapter 3, which is a qualitative add-on to Chapter 2, examines the practices’ organizational ramifications and innovation outcomes through a comparative case study of four major conglomerates in Korea. By doing so, the chapter aims to provide a deeper understanding of the mechanism behind the divergent effects of the prescribed HR practices.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Seung Hoon Lee, accepted the attached license on 2019-06-11 at 22:22.","The student, Seung Hoon Lee, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-06-18 at 08:53.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-06-19 at 13:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14029 on 2019-11-26 at 13:59:49","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:58:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 LEE-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1905085 bytes, checksum: fdb76a93a165c850318b9949bcea1af1 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 5c7d1407c2bd7737507b04af1d31005c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-06-19","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113009 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113009 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 113009 on 2021-11-27T10:15:27Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The duality of practices and its organizational implications: Adoption of new HR practices and consequences on innovation in Korean firms following the 1997 Asian financial crisis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Love, E. Geoffrey","Kraatz, Matthew S.","Somaya, Deepak","Schijven, Mario"],"dc:creator":["Lee, Seung Hoon"],"dc:date":["2019-11-26T20:58:28Z","2021-11-27T10:15:27Z","2019-06-19","2019-08"],"dc:description":["Organizations face normative pressures from institutional actors to adopt various practices. Much institutional research has offered insights about diffusion processes, decoupling, and adoptions’ implication for organizational legitimacy. However, this vast literature appears to have largely overlooked a parallel set of questions about whether and when institutionally prescribed practices deliver the intended outcomes. The questions are important given the dual nature of practices: They have both technical and institutional characteristics and serve as both tools and symbols. Such dual nature of practices has also been recognized to be accountable for unintended negative consequences of technically sound practices. Chapter 2 of my dissertation has two objectives. First, it provides needed empirical evidence about the intended consequences of institutional prescriptions in the context of Korean manufacturing firms. Following the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, Korean firms faced normative pressure to adopt a comprehensive set of new market-oriented HR practices, where the practices were intended to facilitate innovation. Based on the positive effect of the prescription found in this context, I build more general theory about the conditions under which prescriptions deliver intended outcomes. The second objective of Chapter 2 is to develop and test theory about the types of practices more or less likely to deliver intended effects. Consistent with the theory’s predictions, the results show that the prescribed practices have divergent effects on innovation. Chapter 3, which is a qualitative add-on to Chapter 2, examines the practices’ organizational ramifications and innovation outcomes through a comparative case study of four major conglomerates in Korea. By doing so, the chapter aims to provide a deeper understanding of the mechanism behind the divergent effects of the prescribed HR practices.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Seung Hoon Lee, accepted the attached license on 2019-06-11 at 22:22.","The student, Seung Hoon Lee, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-06-18 at 08:53.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-06-19 at 13:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14029 on 2019-11-26 at 13:59:49","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:58:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 LEE-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1905085 bytes, checksum: fdb76a93a165c850318b9949bcea1af1 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 5c7d1407c2bd7737507b04af1d31005c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-06-19","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113009 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 113009 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 113009 on 2021-11-27T10:15:27Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105863"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Seung Hoon Lee"],"dc:subject":["Organizations' Practice Adoption","Institutional Theory"],"dc:title":["The duality of practices and its organizational implications: Adoption of new HR practices and consequences on innovation in Korean firms following the 1997 Asian financial crisis"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z"}