{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105850"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105850","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Making the examined life worth living: The ethics of being a liberal educator","abstract":"This dissertation challenges the dominant conception of liberal education today, or the “Socratic ideal of liberal education,” which is rooted in the ideal of the examined life and has as its core practice the critical examination of the beliefs that shape one’s life and world. This practice is thought to enable students to reconstruct their lives with views they have deliberately and autonomously chosen and to thereby lead flourishing lives. Moreover, within the Socratic ideal, the educator’s job is to unsettle students by provoking them to question and examine their beliefs, without offering students guidance about what to believe. I argue that the practices of the examined life today, which are embedded in an intellectual ethos that valorizes autonomy and a rationalistic and skeptical mode of engaging with the world, is insufficient for students’ flourishing and can impede it by disrupting four conditions of flourishing — epistemic stability, orientation and purpose, faith in and hope for humanity, and a sense of belonging. The Socratic ideal offers inadequate resources for mitigating these risks and for helping students reconstruct their beliefs so as to restore these conditions. These concerns raise ethical questions for liberal educators and are especially significant for today’s “emerging adults,” who scholars argue need more support and guidance due to the weakening of traditional norms and social structures in modern society. Taking into account these developmental needs, I propose an alternative vision for liberal education guided by a conception of flourishing defined as “wholehearted engagement with the good.” In this vision, the liberal educator assumes a “pastoral” role, shepherding students through the examined life by creating a transitional community that supports students in their uncertainty and by offering them substantive guidance based on her own views. This vision also offers a broader conception of the examined life, in which students engage in holistic, affirmative inquiry, the purpose of which is to help student form their beliefs and discover possibilities for wholehearted engagement with the good. This vision ensures that the examined life serves as an ideal for liberal education that truly enables students to live lives worth living.","abstract_html":"This dissertation challenges the dominant conception of liberal education today, or the “Socratic ideal of liberal education,” which is rooted in the ideal of the examined life and has as its core practice the critical examination of the beliefs that shape one’s life and world. This practice is thought to enable students to reconstruct their lives with views they have deliberately and autonomously chosen and to thereby lead flourishing lives. Moreover, within the Socratic ideal, the educator’s job is to unsettle students by provoking them to question and examine their beliefs, without offering students guidance about what to believe. I argue that the practices of the examined life today, which are embedded in an intellectual ethos that valorizes autonomy and a rationalistic and skeptical mode of engaging with the world, is insufficient for students’ flourishing and can impede it by disrupting four conditions of flourishing — epistemic stability, orientation and purpose, faith in and hope for humanity, and a sense of belonging. The Socratic ideal offers inadequate resources for mitigating these risks and for helping students reconstruct their beliefs so as to restore these conditions. These concerns raise ethical questions for liberal educators and are especially significant for today’s “emerging adults,” who scholars argue need more support and guidance due to the weakening of traditional norms and social structures in modern society. Taking into account these developmental needs, I propose an alternative vision for liberal education guided by a conception of flourishing defined as “wholehearted engagement with the good.” In this vision, the liberal educator assumes a “pastoral” role, shepherding students through the examined life by creating a transitional community that supports students in their uncertainty and by offering them substantive guidance based on her own views. This vision also offers a broader conception of the examined life, in which students engage in holistic, affirmative inquiry, the purpose of which is to help student form their beliefs and discover possibilities for wholehearted engagement with the good. This vision ensures that the examined life serves as an ideal for liberal education that truly enables students to live lives worth living.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jo, Katherine Ki-Jung"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Policy Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Higgins, Chris","Burbules, Nicholas","Layton, Richard","Zamani-Gallaher, Eboni"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-11-26T20:56:43Z","date_published":"2019-11-26T20:56:43Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z","subjects":["Liberal Education, Higher Education, College Student Development, Pedagogy, Flourishing"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Katherine Ki-jung Jo"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105850","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Higgins, Chris","Burbules, Nicholas","Layton, Richard","Zamani-Gallaher, Eboni"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jo, Katherine Ki-Jung"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-11-26T20:56:43Z","2021-11-27T10:15:30Z","2019-05-08","2019-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Policy Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Liberal Education, Higher Education, College Student Development, Pedagogy, Flourishing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Katherine Ki-jung Jo"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105850"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation challenges the dominant conception of liberal education today, or the “Socratic ideal of liberal education,” which is rooted in the ideal of the examined life and has as its core practice the critical examination of the beliefs that shape one’s life and world. This practice is thought to enable students to reconstruct their lives with views they have deliberately and autonomously chosen and to thereby lead flourishing lives. Moreover, within the Socratic ideal, the educator’s job is to unsettle students by provoking them to question and examine their beliefs, without offering students guidance about what to believe. I argue that the practices of the examined life today, which are embedded in an intellectual ethos that valorizes autonomy and a rationalistic and skeptical mode of engaging with the world, is insufficient for students’ flourishing and can impede it by disrupting four conditions of flourishing — epistemic stability, orientation and purpose, faith in and hope for humanity, and a sense of belonging. The Socratic ideal offers inadequate resources for mitigating these risks and for helping students reconstruct their beliefs so as to restore these conditions. These concerns raise ethical questions for liberal educators and are especially significant for today’s “emerging adults,” who scholars argue need more support and guidance due to the weakening of traditional norms and social structures in modern society. Taking into account these developmental needs, I propose an alternative vision for liberal education guided by a conception of flourishing defined as “wholehearted engagement with the good.” In this vision, the liberal educator assumes a “pastoral” role, shepherding students through the examined life by creating a transitional community that supports students in their uncertainty and by offering them substantive guidance based on her own views. This vision also offers a broader conception of the examined life, in which students engage in holistic, affirmative inquiry, the purpose of which is to help student form their beliefs and discover possibilities for wholehearted engagement with the good. This vision ensures that the examined life serves as an ideal for liberal education that truly enables students to live lives worth living.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Katherine Jo, accepted the attached license on 2019-05-06 at 18:45.","The student, Katherine Jo, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-05-06 at 19:51.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-05-08 at 16:02.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13964 on 2019-11-26 at 13:59:24","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:56:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 JO-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1691254 bytes, checksum: cfe5b473eb41ea06cc98663562309e41 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: d07bbdd68ba4ec61241eb67adcfedaa1 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4555 bytes, checksum: f9b9e884e3550a49414347a8190bfcc9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-05-08","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:56:50Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:03Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 112995 on 2021-11-27T10:15:30Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Making the examined life worth living: The ethics of being a liberal educator"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Higgins, Chris","Burbules, Nicholas","Layton, Richard","Zamani-Gallaher, Eboni"],"dc:creator":["Jo, Katherine Ki-Jung"],"dc:date":["2019-11-26T20:56:43Z","2021-11-27T10:15:30Z","2019-05-08","2019-08"],"dc:description":["This dissertation challenges the dominant conception of liberal education today, or the “Socratic ideal of liberal education,” which is rooted in the ideal of the examined life and has as its core practice the critical examination of the beliefs that shape one’s life and world. This practice is thought to enable students to reconstruct their lives with views they have deliberately and autonomously chosen and to thereby lead flourishing lives. Moreover, within the Socratic ideal, the educator’s job is to unsettle students by provoking them to question and examine their beliefs, without offering students guidance about what to believe. I argue that the practices of the examined life today, which are embedded in an intellectual ethos that valorizes autonomy and a rationalistic and skeptical mode of engaging with the world, is insufficient for students’ flourishing and can impede it by disrupting four conditions of flourishing — epistemic stability, orientation and purpose, faith in and hope for humanity, and a sense of belonging. The Socratic ideal offers inadequate resources for mitigating these risks and for helping students reconstruct their beliefs so as to restore these conditions. These concerns raise ethical questions for liberal educators and are especially significant for today’s “emerging adults,” who scholars argue need more support and guidance due to the weakening of traditional norms and social structures in modern society. Taking into account these developmental needs, I propose an alternative vision for liberal education guided by a conception of flourishing defined as “wholehearted engagement with the good.” In this vision, the liberal educator assumes a “pastoral” role, shepherding students through the examined life by creating a transitional community that supports students in their uncertainty and by offering them substantive guidance based on her own views. This vision also offers a broader conception of the examined life, in which students engage in holistic, affirmative inquiry, the purpose of which is to help student form their beliefs and discover possibilities for wholehearted engagement with the good. This vision ensures that the examined life serves as an ideal for liberal education that truly enables students to live lives worth living.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2021-08-01","The student, Katherine Jo, accepted the attached license on 2019-05-06 at 18:45.","The student, Katherine Jo, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-05-06 at 19:51.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-05-08 at 16:02.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13964 on 2019-11-26 at 13:59:24","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:56:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 JO-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1691254 bytes, checksum: cfe5b473eb41ea06cc98663562309e41 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: d07bbdd68ba4ec61241eb67adcfedaa1 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4555 bytes, checksum: f9b9e884e3550a49414347a8190bfcc9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-05-08","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:56:50Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:03Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:58:44Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112995 Lift date: 2021-11-26T20:59:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 112995 on 2021-11-27T10:15:30Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105850"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Katherine Ki-jung Jo"],"dc:subject":["Liberal Education, Higher Education, College Student Development, Pedagogy, Flourishing"],"dc:title":["Making the examined life worth living: The ethics of being a liberal educator"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Policy Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:45Z"}