{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105595"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105595","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Convergent probabilistic cues do not trigger syntactic adaptation in relative clause garden-path constructions","abstract":"Previous work has ostensibly shown that readers rapidly adapt to a priori less predicted structures after exposure to unbalanced statistical input (e.g., a high number of reduced relative-clause garden path sentences) and that these readers grow to disfavor the a priori more frequent structure after exposure (Fine, Jaeger, Qian, & Farmer, 2013). However, recent work has failed to replicate effects indicating a penalty for the preferred, more frequent continuation, despite finding a speedup in syntactic repair times after initial exposure to the dispreferred, infrequent structure (Harrington-Stack, James, & Watson, 2018). The current study reports three self-paced reading experiments that tested whether co-occurring cues (explicit comprehension questions, preceding semantic cues, and font color) can help facilitate adaptation to reduced relative/main verb garden path sentences. Results suggest that readers do not overcome pre-existing predictive biases by rapidly adapting to statistically novel linguistic contexts. An emphasis is placed on the difference between task-specific syntactic satiation effects and actual expectation adaptation, the latter of which we argue can only be determined through a penalty for an a priori predicted structure after exposure to its counterpart in the case of garden path constructions.","abstract_html":"Previous work has ostensibly shown that readers rapidly adapt to a priori less predicted structures after exposure to unbalanced statistical input (e.g., a high number of reduced relative-clause garden path sentences) and that these readers grow to disfavor the a priori more frequent structure after exposure (Fine, Jaeger, Qian, &amp; Farmer, 2013). However, recent work has failed to replicate effects indicating a penalty for the preferred, more frequent continuation, despite finding a speedup in syntactic repair times after initial exposure to the dispreferred, infrequent structure (Harrington-Stack, James, &amp; Watson, 2018). The current study reports three self-paced reading experiments that tested whether co-occurring cues (explicit comprehension questions, preceding semantic cues, and font color) can help facilitate adaptation to reduced relative/main verb garden path sentences. Results suggest that readers do not overcome pre-existing predictive biases by rapidly adapting to statistically novel linguistic contexts. An emphasis is placed on the difference between task-specific syntactic satiation effects and actual expectation adaptation, the latter of which we argue can only be determined through a penalty for an a priori predicted structure after exposure to its counterpart in the case of garden path constructions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dempsey, Jack"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Educational Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Christianson, Kiel"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-11-26T20:33:38Z","date_published":"2019-11-26T20:33:38Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:44Z","subjects":["syntactic adaptation","syntactic satiation","probabilistic cues","syntactic parsing","sentence processing"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Jack Dempsey"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105595","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Christianson, Kiel"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dempsey, Jack"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-11-26T20:33:38Z","2019-06-06","2019-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["syntactic adaptation","syntactic satiation","probabilistic cues","syntactic parsing","sentence processing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Jack Dempsey"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105595"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Previous work has ostensibly shown that readers rapidly adapt to a priori less predicted structures after exposure to unbalanced statistical input (e.g., a high number of reduced relative-clause garden path sentences) and that these readers grow to disfavor the a priori more frequent structure after exposure (Fine, Jaeger, Qian, & Farmer, 2013). However, recent work has failed to replicate effects indicating a penalty for the preferred, more frequent continuation, despite finding a speedup in syntactic repair times after initial exposure to the dispreferred, infrequent structure (Harrington-Stack, James, & Watson, 2018). The current study reports three self-paced reading experiments that tested whether co-occurring cues (explicit comprehension questions, preceding semantic cues, and font color) can help facilitate adaptation to reduced relative/main verb garden path sentences. Results suggest that readers do not overcome pre-existing predictive biases by rapidly adapting to statistically novel linguistic contexts. An emphasis is placed on the difference between task-specific syntactic satiation effects and actual expectation adaptation, the latter of which we argue can only be determined through a penalty for an a priori predicted structure after exposure to its counterpart in the case of garden path constructions.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-11-26 without embargo terms","The student, Jack Dempsey, accepted the attached license on 2019-06-05 at 16:46.","The student, Jack Dempsey, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2019-06-05 at 16:53.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2019-06-06 at 15:18.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14019 on 2019-11-26 at 12:49:35","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:33:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 DEMPSEY-THESIS-2019.pdf: 1319612 bytes, checksum: 8ec341bfe8059503ea5e595cf9a66b1d (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: f755470f02fa0517ec9881b30bf52cfc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-06-06"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Convergent probabilistic cues do not trigger syntactic adaptation in relative clause garden-path constructions"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Christianson, Kiel"],"dc:creator":["Dempsey, Jack"],"dc:date":["2019-11-26T20:33:38Z","2019-06-06","2019-08"],"dc:description":["Previous work has ostensibly shown that readers rapidly adapt to a priori less predicted structures after exposure to unbalanced statistical input (e.g., a high number of reduced relative-clause garden path sentences) and that these readers grow to disfavor the a priori more frequent structure after exposure (Fine, Jaeger, Qian, & Farmer, 2013). However, recent work has failed to replicate effects indicating a penalty for the preferred, more frequent continuation, despite finding a speedup in syntactic repair times after initial exposure to the dispreferred, infrequent structure (Harrington-Stack, James, & Watson, 2018). The current study reports three self-paced reading experiments that tested whether co-occurring cues (explicit comprehension questions, preceding semantic cues, and font color) can help facilitate adaptation to reduced relative/main verb garden path sentences. Results suggest that readers do not overcome pre-existing predictive biases by rapidly adapting to statistically novel linguistic contexts. An emphasis is placed on the difference between task-specific syntactic satiation effects and actual expectation adaptation, the latter of which we argue can only be determined through a penalty for an a priori predicted structure after exposure to its counterpart in the case of garden path constructions.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-11-26 without embargo terms","The student, Jack Dempsey, accepted the attached license on 2019-06-05 at 16:46.","The student, Jack Dempsey, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2019-06-05 at 16:53.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2019-06-06 at 15:18.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #14019 on 2019-11-26 at 12:49:35","Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-26T20:33:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 DEMPSEY-THESIS-2019.pdf: 1319612 bytes, checksum: 8ec341bfe8059503ea5e595cf9a66b1d (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: f755470f02fa0517ec9881b30bf52cfc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-06-06"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105595"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Jack Dempsey"],"dc:subject":["syntactic adaptation","syntactic satiation","probabilistic cues","syntactic parsing","sentence processing"],"dc:title":["Convergent probabilistic cues do not trigger syntactic adaptation in relative clause garden-path constructions"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:44Z"}