{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105053"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/105053","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The value of action: An examination of when and how actions are evaluated more positively than inactions","abstract":"Human behavior varies along a continuum of activity, with demanding behaviors characterizing actions and restful states characterizing inactions. Action and inaction are integral components of daily life, affecting our decision-making, goal pursuit, self-regulation, well-being, and health. Understanding how people conceptualize and evaluate action and inaction is thus important. The present research found that actions are perceived differently than inactions (Studies 1-2). People not only evaluate actions more favorably than inactions (Study 3) but prefer to engage in actions over inactions as well (Study 4). This phenomenon is driven by a natural tendency to think of actions as more intentional (Study 5), but making intentionality salient does not always reduce the bias favoring action (Study 6). Balancing action and inaction is important for healthy human functioning, underlining the importance of further understanding evaluative biases in this domain.","abstract_html":"Human behavior varies along a continuum of activity, with demanding behaviors characterizing actions and restful states characterizing inactions. Action and inaction are integral components of daily life, affecting our decision-making, goal pursuit, self-regulation, well-being, and health. Understanding how people conceptualize and evaluate action and inaction is thus important. The present research found that actions are perceived differently than inactions (Studies 1-2). People not only evaluate actions more favorably than inactions (Study 3) but prefer to engage in actions over inactions as well (Study 4). This phenomenon is driven by a natural tendency to think of actions as more intentional (Study 5), but making intentionality salient does not always reduce the bias favoring action (Study 6). Balancing action and inaction is important for healthy human functioning, underlining the importance of further understanding evaluative biases in this domain.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sunderrajan, Aashna"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Albarracín, Dolores","Cohen, Dov","Mehta, Ravi","Laurent, Sean","Miller, Andrea"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-08-23T20:36:01Z","date_published":"2019-08-23T20:36:01Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:44Z","subjects":["action","inaction","commission","omission","bias","evaluation","intentionality"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Aashna Sunderrajan"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105053","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Albarracín, Dolores","Cohen, Dov","Mehta, Ravi","Laurent, Sean","Miller, Andrea"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sunderrajan, Aashna"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-08-23T20:36:01Z","2021-08-24T09:15:20Z","2019-04-18","2019-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["action","inaction","commission","omission","bias","evaluation","intentionality"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Aashna Sunderrajan"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105053"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Human behavior varies along a continuum of activity, with demanding behaviors characterizing actions and restful states characterizing inactions. Action and inaction are integral components of daily life, affecting our decision-making, goal pursuit, self-regulation, well-being, and health. Understanding how people conceptualize and evaluate action and inaction is thus important. The present research found that actions are perceived differently than inactions (Studies 1-2). People not only evaluate actions more favorably than inactions (Study 3) but prefer to engage in actions over inactions as well (Study 4). This phenomenon is driven by a natural tendency to think of actions as more intentional (Study 5), but making intentionality salient does not always reduce the bias favoring action (Study 6). Balancing action and inaction is important for healthy human functioning, underlining the importance of further understanding evaluative biases in this domain.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2021-05-01","The student, Aashna Sunderrajan, accepted the attached license on 2019-04-17 at 18:09.","The student, Aashna Sunderrajan, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-04-17 at 18:20.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-04-18 at 11:57.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13725 on 2019-08-22 at 15:07:21","Made available in DSpace on 2019-08-23T20:36:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 SUNDERRAJAN-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1099812 bytes, checksum: ea7babf55e321615400a55b272812756 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4215 bytes, checksum: e527f25177f58755abd6f4d062d66dc9 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4561 bytes, checksum: ed0cccae9355acab0fe16806c8f31eed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-04-18","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112172 Lift date: 2021-08-23T20:36:18Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 112172 on 2021-08-24T09:15:20Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The value of action: An examination of when and how actions are evaluated more positively than inactions"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Albarracín, Dolores","Cohen, Dov","Mehta, Ravi","Laurent, Sean","Miller, Andrea"],"dc:creator":["Sunderrajan, Aashna"],"dc:date":["2019-08-23T20:36:01Z","2021-08-24T09:15:20Z","2019-04-18","2019-05"],"dc:description":["Human behavior varies along a continuum of activity, with demanding behaviors characterizing actions and restful states characterizing inactions. Action and inaction are integral components of daily life, affecting our decision-making, goal pursuit, self-regulation, well-being, and health. Understanding how people conceptualize and evaluate action and inaction is thus important. The present research found that actions are perceived differently than inactions (Studies 1-2). People not only evaluate actions more favorably than inactions (Study 3) but prefer to engage in actions over inactions as well (Study 4). This phenomenon is driven by a natural tendency to think of actions as more intentional (Study 5), but making intentionality salient does not always reduce the bias favoring action (Study 6). Balancing action and inaction is important for healthy human functioning, underlining the importance of further understanding evaluative biases in this domain.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2021-05-01","The student, Aashna Sunderrajan, accepted the attached license on 2019-04-17 at 18:09.","The student, Aashna Sunderrajan, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-04-17 at 18:20.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-04-18 at 11:57.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13725 on 2019-08-22 at 15:07:21","Made available in DSpace on 2019-08-23T20:36:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 SUNDERRAJAN-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 1099812 bytes, checksum: ea7babf55e321615400a55b272812756 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4215 bytes, checksum: e527f25177f58755abd6f4d062d66dc9 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4561 bytes, checksum: ed0cccae9355acab0fe16806c8f31eed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-04-18","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 112172 Lift date: 2021-08-23T20:36:18Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 112172 on 2021-08-24T09:15:20Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105053"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Aashna Sunderrajan"],"dc:subject":["action","inaction","commission","omission","bias","evaluation","intentionality"],"dc:title":["The value of action: An examination of when and how actions are evaluated more positively than inactions"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:44Z"}