{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/104866"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/104866","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"LIFT: Integrating stakeholder voices into algorithmic team formation","abstract":"Team formation tools assume instructors should configure the criteria for creating teams, precluding students from participating in a process that affects their learning experience. We propose LIFT, a novel learner-centered workflow where students propose, vote for, and weigh team formation criteria, and the collective results serve as inputs to the team formation algorithm. We conducted an experiment (N=289) comparing LIFT to the usual instructor-led process, and interviewed participants to evaluate their perceptions of LIFT and its outcomes. We found learners were capable of proposing novel criteria not part of existing algorithmic tools, like organizational style. Generally, learners avoided criteria frequently selected by instructors, including gender and GPA, and instead preferred those that promoted efficient collaboration. Second, LIFT led to team outcomes comparable to those achieved by the instructor-led approach, despite the differences in the configurations, and teams valued having control of the team formation process. We provide instructors and tool designers with a workflow and evidence supporting giving learners control of the algorithmic process used for grouping them into teams.","abstract_html":"Team formation tools assume instructors should configure the criteria for creating teams, precluding students from participating in a process that affects their learning experience. We propose LIFT, a novel learner-centered workflow where students propose, vote for, and weigh team formation criteria, and the collective results serve as inputs to the team formation algorithm. We conducted an experiment (N=289) comparing LIFT to the usual instructor-led process, and interviewed participants to evaluate their perceptions of LIFT and its outcomes. We found learners were capable of proposing novel criteria not part of existing algorithmic tools, like organizational style. Generally, learners avoided criteria frequently selected by instructors, including gender and GPA, and instead preferred those that promoted efficient collaboration. Second, LIFT led to team outcomes comparable to those achieved by the instructor-led approach, despite the differences in the configurations, and teams valued having control of the team formation process. We provide instructors and tool designers with a workflow and evidence supporting giving learners control of the algorithmic process used for grouping them into teams.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hastings, Emily Marie"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Computer Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bailey, Brian P.","Karahalios, Karrie"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-08-23T19:55:46Z","date_published":"2019-08-23T19:55:46Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z","subjects":["Algorithms","CATME","Learnersourcing","Crowdsourcing","Team formation","Team composition"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2019 Emily Marie Hastings"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/104866","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bailey, Brian P.","Karahalios, Karrie"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hastings, Emily Marie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-08-23T19:55:46Z","2019-04-18","2019-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Computer Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Algorithms","CATME","Learnersourcing","Crowdsourcing","Team formation","Team composition"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2019 Emily Marie Hastings"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/104866"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Team formation tools assume instructors should configure the criteria for creating teams, precluding students from participating in a process that affects their learning experience. We propose LIFT, a novel learner-centered workflow where students propose, vote for, and weigh team formation criteria, and the collective results serve as inputs to the team formation algorithm. We conducted an experiment (N=289) comparing LIFT to the usual instructor-led process, and interviewed participants to evaluate their perceptions of LIFT and its outcomes. We found learners were capable of proposing novel criteria not part of existing algorithmic tools, like organizational style. Generally, learners avoided criteria frequently selected by instructors, including gender and GPA, and instead preferred those that promoted efficient collaboration. Second, LIFT led to team outcomes comparable to those achieved by the instructor-led approach, despite the differences in the configurations, and teams valued having control of the team formation process. We provide instructors and tool designers with a workflow and evidence supporting giving learners control of the algorithmic process used for grouping them into teams.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-08-22 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Hastings, accepted the attached license on 2019-04-18 at 12:10.","The student, Emily Hastings, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2019-04-18 at 12:28.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2019-04-18 at 18:01.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13744 on 2019-08-22 at 14:44:48","Made available in DSpace on 2019-08-23T19:55:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 HASTINGS-THESIS-2019.pdf: 545621 bytes, checksum: 1d6b00d1be75c40072d2c92b3f718e69 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 06157cd418e2e0c70d34ef569d592460 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-04-18"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["LIFT: Integrating stakeholder voices into algorithmic team formation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bailey, Brian P.","Karahalios, Karrie"],"dc:creator":["Hastings, Emily Marie"],"dc:date":["2019-08-23T19:55:46Z","2019-04-18","2019-05"],"dc:description":["Team formation tools assume instructors should configure the criteria for creating teams, precluding students from participating in a process that affects their learning experience. We propose LIFT, a novel learner-centered workflow where students propose, vote for, and weigh team formation criteria, and the collective results serve as inputs to the team formation algorithm. We conducted an experiment (N=289) comparing LIFT to the usual instructor-led process, and interviewed participants to evaluate their perceptions of LIFT and its outcomes. We found learners were capable of proposing novel criteria not part of existing algorithmic tools, like organizational style. Generally, learners avoided criteria frequently selected by instructors, including gender and GPA, and instead preferred those that promoted efficient collaboration. Second, LIFT led to team outcomes comparable to those achieved by the instructor-led approach, despite the differences in the configurations, and teams valued having control of the team formation process. We provide instructors and tool designers with a workflow and evidence supporting giving learners control of the algorithmic process used for grouping them into teams.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-08-22 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Hastings, accepted the attached license on 2019-04-18 at 12:10.","The student, Emily Hastings, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2019-04-18 at 12:28.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2019-04-18 at 18:01.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13744 on 2019-08-22 at 14:44:48","Made available in DSpace on 2019-08-23T19:55:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 HASTINGS-THESIS-2019.pdf: 545621 bytes, checksum: 1d6b00d1be75c40072d2c92b3f718e69 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 06157cd418e2e0c70d34ef569d592460 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-04-18"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/104866"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2019 Emily Marie Hastings"],"dc:subject":["Algorithms","CATME","Learnersourcing","Crowdsourcing","Team formation","Team composition"],"dc:title":["LIFT: Integrating stakeholder voices into algorithmic team formation"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Computer Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z"}