{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/104760"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/104760","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"How do you define ‘success?’ Selecting criteria in evaluations of informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education","abstract":"Evaluation assesses program merit and worth to deepen understanding and inform decision-making. The assessment is accomplished through the valuing process: the activities of defining success, specifying evaluative criteria, and applying those criteria to reach conclusions. This dissertation examines the substance, source, and application of evaluative criteria—conceptually and empirically—to strengthen the valuing process. The work is grounded in the domain of informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education evaluation yet is broadly applicable. The first paper advances an empirically-supported model that describes and integrates two aspects of evaluative criteria: substance and source. The second article presents a typology that distinguishes among criteria based on source and application and identifies methods for selecting and applying criteria to represent the values of program participants. The third paper reports a values-inquiry case study that empirically investigates criteria for a public library makerspace and reveals the need for individualized, participant-defined criteria. Collectively, these papers lay the groundwork for building an empirical, descriptive theory of valuing; advancing novel methods for criteria selection; and deepening understanding about criteria selection in evaluation of informal STEM education.","abstract_html":"Evaluation assesses program merit and worth to deepen understanding and inform decision-making. The assessment is accomplished through the valuing process: the activities of defining success, specifying evaluative criteria, and applying those criteria to reach conclusions. This dissertation examines the substance, source, and application of evaluative criteria—conceptually and empirically—to strengthen the valuing process. The work is grounded in the domain of informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education evaluation yet is broadly applicable. The first paper advances an empirically-supported model that describes and integrates two aspects of evaluative criteria: substance and source. The second article presents a typology that distinguishes among criteria based on source and application and identifies methods for selecting and applying criteria to represent the values of program participants. The third paper reports a values-inquiry case study that empirically investigates criteria for a public library makerspace and reveals the need for individualized, participant-defined criteria. Collectively, these papers lay the groundwork for building an empirical, descriptive theory of valuing; advancing novel methods for criteria selection; and deepening understanding about criteria selection in evaluation of informal STEM education.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Teasdale, Rebecca M."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Greene, Jennifer C.","Lane, H. Chad","Willett, Rebekah J.","Zamani-Gallaher, Eboni M.","Julnes, George"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-08-23T19:51:32Z","date_published":"2019-08-23T19:51:32Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z","subjects":["evaluation","evaluative criteria","science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)","informal STEM education","makerspaces","making","public libraries"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["© 2019 Rebecca M. Teasdale"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/104760","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Greene, Jennifer C.","Lane, H. Chad","Willett, Rebekah J.","Zamani-Gallaher, Eboni M.","Julnes, George"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Teasdale, Rebecca M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-08-23T19:51:32Z","2019-03-18","2019-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["evaluation","evaluative criteria","science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)","informal STEM education","makerspaces","making","public libraries"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© 2019 Rebecca M. Teasdale"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/104760"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Evaluation assesses program merit and worth to deepen understanding and inform decision-making. The assessment is accomplished through the valuing process: the activities of defining success, specifying evaluative criteria, and applying those criteria to reach conclusions. This dissertation examines the substance, source, and application of evaluative criteria—conceptually and empirically—to strengthen the valuing process. The work is grounded in the domain of informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education evaluation yet is broadly applicable. The first paper advances an empirically-supported model that describes and integrates two aspects of evaluative criteria: substance and source. The second article presents a typology that distinguishes among criteria based on source and application and identifies methods for selecting and applying criteria to represent the values of program participants. The third paper reports a values-inquiry case study that empirically investigates criteria for a public library makerspace and reveals the need for individualized, participant-defined criteria. Collectively, these papers lay the groundwork for building an empirical, descriptive theory of valuing; advancing novel methods for criteria selection; and deepening understanding about criteria selection in evaluation of informal STEM education.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-08-22 without embargo terms","The student, Rebecca Teasdale, accepted the attached license on 2019-03-14 at 17:01.","The student, Rebecca Teasdale, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-03-14 at 17:18.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-03-18 at 11:10.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13427 on 2019-08-22 at 14:40:40","Made available in DSpace on 2019-08-23T19:51:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 TEASDALE-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 5704617 bytes, checksum: 46ffb0bbcece9a6894c50d6e9827edb1 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: f3edeefac2011886354fbe9fb5bb62b0 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4559 bytes, checksum: 92d8a413e343eb3cc23ded4dbb57a3ff (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-03-18"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["How do you define ‘success?’ Selecting criteria in evaluations of informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Greene, Jennifer C.","Lane, H. Chad","Willett, Rebekah J.","Zamani-Gallaher, Eboni M.","Julnes, George"],"dc:creator":["Teasdale, Rebecca M."],"dc:date":["2019-08-23T19:51:32Z","2019-03-18","2019-05"],"dc:description":["Evaluation assesses program merit and worth to deepen understanding and inform decision-making. The assessment is accomplished through the valuing process: the activities of defining success, specifying evaluative criteria, and applying those criteria to reach conclusions. This dissertation examines the substance, source, and application of evaluative criteria—conceptually and empirically—to strengthen the valuing process. The work is grounded in the domain of informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education evaluation yet is broadly applicable. The first paper advances an empirically-supported model that describes and integrates two aspects of evaluative criteria: substance and source. The second article presents a typology that distinguishes among criteria based on source and application and identifies methods for selecting and applying criteria to represent the values of program participants. The third paper reports a values-inquiry case study that empirically investigates criteria for a public library makerspace and reveals the need for individualized, participant-defined criteria. Collectively, these papers lay the groundwork for building an empirical, descriptive theory of valuing; advancing novel methods for criteria selection; and deepening understanding about criteria selection in evaluation of informal STEM education.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-08-22 without embargo terms","The student, Rebecca Teasdale, accepted the attached license on 2019-03-14 at 17:01.","The student, Rebecca Teasdale, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2019-03-14 at 17:18.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2019-03-18 at 11:10.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13427 on 2019-08-22 at 14:40:40","Made available in DSpace on 2019-08-23T19:51:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 TEASDALE-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf: 5704617 bytes, checksum: 46ffb0bbcece9a6894c50d6e9827edb1 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: f3edeefac2011886354fbe9fb5bb62b0 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4559 bytes, checksum: 92d8a413e343eb3cc23ded4dbb57a3ff (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-03-18"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/104760"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["© 2019 Rebecca M. Teasdale"],"dc:subject":["evaluation","evaluative criteria","science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)","informal STEM education","makerspaces","making","public libraries"],"dc:title":["How do you define ‘success?’ Selecting criteria in evaluations of informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z"}