{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/102901"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/102901","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The problem of evil in early modern English literature","abstract":"This dissertation argues that theodicy was a predominant concern of early modern English literary culture, and that response to the so-called “problem of evil” was one of its major leitmotifs. With chapters spanning from the Elizabethan to the Restoration eras, its interpretations of canonical poetic and dramatic texts (by Spenser, Shakespeare, Lucy Hutchinson, and John Milton) shed light on the avidity of interest and diversity of approach early modern writers brought to questions of evil. Bringing philological evidence from the literary archive to bear on existing historical-theoretical theses regarding the relationship between early modern theodicy and the constitution of modernity (theodicy drives secularization; theodicy motivates the development of German Idealism from Leibniz to Kant), I argue that these existing theories tend to oversimplify the complexity of seventeenth century thinking about the origin and persistence of evil in the world and in human experience. I attend to the hybridity of early modern literary discourse, which speaks at the thresholds dividing secular and sacred, private and public spheres, in order to restore this sense of complexity and open up new avenues of inquiry regarding the imagination of evil in the modern age. Much early modern theodicy, I find, contributed to the constitution of the modern in a negative way, comprising directions not taken, forms of thought excluded in pursuit of rationality, and legitimizing institutions superseded as modernity took shape.","abstract_html":"This dissertation argues that theodicy was a predominant concern of early modern English literary culture, and that response to the so-called “problem of evil” was one of its major leitmotifs. With chapters spanning from the Elizabethan to the Restoration eras, its interpretations of canonical poetic and dramatic texts (by Spenser, Shakespeare, Lucy Hutchinson, and John Milton) shed light on the avidity of interest and diversity of approach early modern writers brought to questions of evil. Bringing philological evidence from the literary archive to bear on existing historical-theoretical theses regarding the relationship between early modern theodicy and the constitution of modernity (theodicy drives secularization; theodicy motivates the development of German Idealism from Leibniz to Kant), I argue that these existing theories tend to oversimplify the complexity of seventeenth century thinking about the origin and persistence of evil in the world and in human experience. I attend to the hybridity of early modern literary discourse, which speaks at the thresholds dividing secular and sacred, private and public spheres, in order to restore this sense of complexity and open up new avenues of inquiry regarding the imagination of evil in the modern age. Much early modern theodicy, I find, contributed to the constitution of the modern in a negative way, comprising directions not taken, forms of thought excluded in pursuit of rationality, and legitimizing institutions superseded as modernity took shape.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fadely, Jonathan Patrick"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Perry, Curtis","Mohamed, Feisal G.","Gray, Catharine","Markley, Robert"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-02-08T18:39:42Z","date_published":"2019-02-08T18:39:42Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z","subjects":["theodicy","problem of evil","modernity","secularization","poetry","evil in literature","Shakespeare","Milton","Spenser"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2018 Jonathan Fadely"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/102901","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Perry, Curtis","Mohamed, Feisal G.","Gray, Catharine","Markley, Robert"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fadely, Jonathan Patrick"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-02-08T18:39:42Z","2021-02-09T10:15:12Z","2018-10-26","2018-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["theodicy","problem of evil","modernity","secularization","poetry","evil in literature","Shakespeare","Milton","Spenser"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2018 Jonathan Fadely"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/102901"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation argues that theodicy was a predominant concern of early modern English literary culture, and that response to the so-called “problem of evil” was one of its major leitmotifs. With chapters spanning from the Elizabethan to the Restoration eras, its interpretations of canonical poetic and dramatic texts (by Spenser, Shakespeare, Lucy Hutchinson, and John Milton) shed light on the avidity of interest and diversity of approach early modern writers brought to questions of evil. Bringing philological evidence from the literary archive to bear on existing historical-theoretical theses regarding the relationship between early modern theodicy and the constitution of modernity (theodicy drives secularization; theodicy motivates the development of German Idealism from Leibniz to Kant), I argue that these existing theories tend to oversimplify the complexity of seventeenth century thinking about the origin and persistence of evil in the world and in human experience. I attend to the hybridity of early modern literary discourse, which speaks at the thresholds dividing secular and sacred, private and public spheres, in order to restore this sense of complexity and open up new avenues of inquiry regarding the imagination of evil in the modern age. Much early modern theodicy, I find, contributed to the constitution of the modern in a negative way, comprising directions not taken, forms of thought excluded in pursuit of rationality, and legitimizing institutions superseded as modernity took shape.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2020-12-01","The student, Jonathan Fadely, accepted the attached license on 2018-10-25 at 15:09.","The student, Jonathan Fadely, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2018-10-25 at 15:17.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2018-10-26 at 11:51.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13044 on 2019-02-08 at 11:38:21","Made available in DSpace on 2019-02-08T18:39:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 FADELY-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf: 1270067 bytes, checksum: 274a3a40474d4f03edafcbcae557c5ed (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 4667796331e0aca643c9046b441bbba6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-10-26","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:40:00Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:42:23Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:43:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:44:50Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 109927 on 2021-02-09T10:15:12Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The problem of evil in early modern English literature"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Perry, Curtis","Mohamed, Feisal G.","Gray, Catharine","Markley, Robert"],"dc:creator":["Fadely, Jonathan Patrick"],"dc:date":["2019-02-08T18:39:42Z","2021-02-09T10:15:12Z","2018-10-26","2018-12"],"dc:description":["This dissertation argues that theodicy was a predominant concern of early modern English literary culture, and that response to the so-called “problem of evil” was one of its major leitmotifs. With chapters spanning from the Elizabethan to the Restoration eras, its interpretations of canonical poetic and dramatic texts (by Spenser, Shakespeare, Lucy Hutchinson, and John Milton) shed light on the avidity of interest and diversity of approach early modern writers brought to questions of evil. Bringing philological evidence from the literary archive to bear on existing historical-theoretical theses regarding the relationship between early modern theodicy and the constitution of modernity (theodicy drives secularization; theodicy motivates the development of German Idealism from Leibniz to Kant), I argue that these existing theories tend to oversimplify the complexity of seventeenth century thinking about the origin and persistence of evil in the world and in human experience. I attend to the hybridity of early modern literary discourse, which speaks at the thresholds dividing secular and sacred, private and public spheres, in order to restore this sense of complexity and open up new avenues of inquiry regarding the imagination of evil in the modern age. Much early modern theodicy, I find, contributed to the constitution of the modern in a negative way, comprising directions not taken, forms of thought excluded in pursuit of rationality, and legitimizing institutions superseded as modernity took shape.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2020-12-01","The student, Jonathan Fadely, accepted the attached license on 2018-10-25 at 15:09.","The student, Jonathan Fadely, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2018-10-25 at 15:17.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2018-10-26 at 11:51.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13044 on 2019-02-08 at 11:38:21","Made available in DSpace on 2019-02-08T18:39:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 FADELY-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf: 1270067 bytes, checksum: 274a3a40474d4f03edafcbcae557c5ed (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 4667796331e0aca643c9046b441bbba6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-10-26","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:40:00Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:42:23Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:43:54Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 109927 Lift date: 2021-02-08T18:44:50Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 109927 on 2021-02-09T10:15:12Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/102901"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2018 Jonathan Fadely"],"dc:subject":["theodicy","problem of evil","modernity","secularization","poetry","evil in literature","Shakespeare","Milton","Spenser"],"dc:title":["The problem of evil in early modern English literature"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z"}