{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/102521"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/102521","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Comparative analysis of nitrate load estimation techniques in watersheds with different land-use characteristics","abstract":"Water quality issues stemming from high nutrient concentration in water bodies are a commonplace in the United States (US) and all over the world. Nutrient loads in surface water can be estimated by monitoring their concentrations in the water bodies. The challenge is to determine the optimal data sampling frequency and the best method for the estimation of nutrient concentrations that minimizes the uncertainty caused by data and modeling errors in the estimated data. For that purpose, researchers have used various regression models such as LOADEST, WRTDS, linear interpolation, and error minimization techniques over the years. However, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which method or sampling frequency is best suited to different scenarios of water quality data. This analysis provides further scientific insight by comparing the performances of different estimation techniques on long-term nutrient concentration datasets for three different watersheds in Ohio with different land-use characteristics. This study compared the accuracy of LOADEST, WRTDS, and linear interpolation methods in predicting daily nitrate concentration at four different sampling frequencies using long-term data sets for Maumee River, Cuyahoga River, and Grand River. The land-use patterns in Maumee, Cuyahoga, and Grand River watersheds were agricultural, urban, and forest dominated with mixed land-use respectively. The relationship between the yearly discharge and nitrate concentration were notably different for each watershed. A higher data sampling frequency gave better results for most of the scenarios in the study. The bias for WRTDS method was usually lower than for linear interpolation and LOADEST and the results for WRTDS were consistent for all four data frequencies in most cases. The RMSE and R2 values for LOADEST and linear interpolation models were comparable and better than for WRTDS for all three river datasets. The tradeoff between RMSE and PBIAS was particularly obvious in the Maumee results. The Linear Interpolation method was the best-suited method for Cuyahoga and Grand River datasets which are dominated by urban and forest land respectively.","abstract_html":"Water quality issues stemming from high nutrient concentration in water bodies are a commonplace in the United States (US) and all over the world. Nutrient loads in surface water can be estimated by monitoring their concentrations in the water bodies. The challenge is to determine the optimal data sampling frequency and the best method for the estimation of nutrient concentrations that minimizes the uncertainty caused by data and modeling errors in the estimated data. For that purpose, researchers have used various regression models such as LOADEST, WRTDS, linear interpolation, and error minimization techniques over the years. However, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which method or sampling frequency is best suited to different scenarios of water quality data. This analysis provides further scientific insight by comparing the performances of different estimation techniques on long-term nutrient concentration datasets for three different watersheds in Ohio with different land-use characteristics. This study compared the accuracy of LOADEST, WRTDS, and linear interpolation methods in predicting daily nitrate concentration at four different sampling frequencies using long-term data sets for Maumee River, Cuyahoga River, and Grand River. The land-use patterns in Maumee, Cuyahoga, and Grand River watersheds were agricultural, urban, and forest dominated with mixed land-use respectively. The relationship between the yearly discharge and nitrate concentration were notably different for each watershed. A higher data sampling frequency gave better results for most of the scenarios in the study. The bias for WRTDS method was usually lower than for linear interpolation and LOADEST and the results for WRTDS were consistent for all four data frequencies in most cases. The RMSE and R2 values for LOADEST and linear interpolation models were comparable and better than for WRTDS for all three river datasets. The tradeoff between RMSE and PBIAS was particularly obvious in the Maumee results. The Linear Interpolation method was the best-suited method for Cuyahoga and Grand River datasets which are dominated by urban and forest land respectively.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kandel, Rajesh"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Agricultural & Biological Engr","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bhattarai, Rabin"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-02-06T19:36:44Z","date_published":"2019-02-06T19:36:44Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z","subjects":["Cuyahoga","estimation","Grand","Linear Interpolation","nutrient load","LOADEST","Maumee","nitrate","nutrient concentration","WRTDS"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2018 Rajesh Kandel"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/102521","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bhattarai, Rabin"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kandel, Rajesh"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2019-02-06T19:36:44Z","2021-02-08T10:15:18Z","2018-12-13","2018-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agricultural & Biological Engr"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Cuyahoga","estimation","Grand","Linear Interpolation","nutrient load","LOADEST","Maumee","nitrate","nutrient concentration","WRTDS"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2018 Rajesh Kandel"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/102521"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Water quality issues stemming from high nutrient concentration in water bodies are a commonplace in the United States (US) and all over the world. Nutrient loads in surface water can be estimated by monitoring their concentrations in the water bodies. The challenge is to determine the optimal data sampling frequency and the best method for the estimation of nutrient concentrations that minimizes the uncertainty caused by data and modeling errors in the estimated data. For that purpose, researchers have used various regression models such as LOADEST, WRTDS, linear interpolation, and error minimization techniques over the years. However, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which method or sampling frequency is best suited to different scenarios of water quality data. This analysis provides further scientific insight by comparing the performances of different estimation techniques on long-term nutrient concentration datasets for three different watersheds in Ohio with different land-use characteristics. This study compared the accuracy of LOADEST, WRTDS, and linear interpolation methods in predicting daily nitrate concentration at four different sampling frequencies using long-term data sets for Maumee River, Cuyahoga River, and Grand River. The land-use patterns in Maumee, Cuyahoga, and Grand River watersheds were agricultural, urban, and forest dominated with mixed land-use respectively. The relationship between the yearly discharge and nitrate concentration were notably different for each watershed. A higher data sampling frequency gave better results for most of the scenarios in the study. The bias for WRTDS method was usually lower than for linear interpolation and LOADEST and the results for WRTDS were consistent for all four data frequencies in most cases. The RMSE and R2 values for LOADEST and linear interpolation models were comparable and better than for WRTDS for all three river datasets. The tradeoff between RMSE and PBIAS was particularly obvious in the Maumee results. The Linear Interpolation method was the best-suited method for Cuyahoga and Grand River datasets which are dominated by urban and forest land respectively.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-02-05 without embargo terms","The student, Rajesh Kandel, accepted the attached license on 2018-12-12 at 17:14.","The student, Rajesh Kandel, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2018-12-12 at 19:03.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2018-12-13 at 12:57.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13307 on 2019-02-05 at 11:16:14","Made available in DSpace on 2019-02-06T19:36:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 KANDEL-THESIS-2018.pdf: 4097326 bytes, checksum: 8b750df40a879f6a1069a6faf0949142 (MD5) MS Thesis_rkandel2.docx: 3881861 bytes, checksum: 92095fe125b86ee779243849d2e015bf (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 5fe44aa9a96939c6495feb674aff6efb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-12-13","Limited Restriction set for Item 109539 on 2019-02-08T20:13:54Z with date 2021-02-08 by astein@illinois.edu.","Limited Restriction set for Item 109539 on 2019-02-08T20:14:00Z with date 2021-02-08 by astein@illinois.edu.","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 109539 on 2021-02-08T10:15:18Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparative analysis of nitrate load estimation techniques in watersheds with different land-use characteristics"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bhattarai, Rabin"],"dc:creator":["Kandel, Rajesh"],"dc:date":["2019-02-06T19:36:44Z","2021-02-08T10:15:18Z","2018-12-13","2018-12"],"dc:description":["Water quality issues stemming from high nutrient concentration in water bodies are a commonplace in the United States (US) and all over the world. Nutrient loads in surface water can be estimated by monitoring their concentrations in the water bodies. The challenge is to determine the optimal data sampling frequency and the best method for the estimation of nutrient concentrations that minimizes the uncertainty caused by data and modeling errors in the estimated data. For that purpose, researchers have used various regression models such as LOADEST, WRTDS, linear interpolation, and error minimization techniques over the years. However, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which method or sampling frequency is best suited to different scenarios of water quality data. This analysis provides further scientific insight by comparing the performances of different estimation techniques on long-term nutrient concentration datasets for three different watersheds in Ohio with different land-use characteristics. This study compared the accuracy of LOADEST, WRTDS, and linear interpolation methods in predicting daily nitrate concentration at four different sampling frequencies using long-term data sets for Maumee River, Cuyahoga River, and Grand River. The land-use patterns in Maumee, Cuyahoga, and Grand River watersheds were agricultural, urban, and forest dominated with mixed land-use respectively. The relationship between the yearly discharge and nitrate concentration were notably different for each watershed. A higher data sampling frequency gave better results for most of the scenarios in the study. The bias for WRTDS method was usually lower than for linear interpolation and LOADEST and the results for WRTDS were consistent for all four data frequencies in most cases. The RMSE and R2 values for LOADEST and linear interpolation models were comparable and better than for WRTDS for all three river datasets. The tradeoff between RMSE and PBIAS was particularly obvious in the Maumee results. The Linear Interpolation method was the best-suited method for Cuyahoga and Grand River datasets which are dominated by urban and forest land respectively.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2019-02-05 without embargo terms","The student, Rajesh Kandel, accepted the attached license on 2018-12-12 at 17:14.","The student, Rajesh Kandel, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2018-12-12 at 19:03.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2018-12-13 at 12:57.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #13307 on 2019-02-05 at 11:16:14","Made available in DSpace on 2019-02-06T19:36:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 KANDEL-THESIS-2018.pdf: 4097326 bytes, checksum: 8b750df40a879f6a1069a6faf0949142 (MD5) MS Thesis_rkandel2.docx: 3881861 bytes, checksum: 92095fe125b86ee779243849d2e015bf (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 5fe44aa9a96939c6495feb674aff6efb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-12-13","Limited Restriction set for Item 109539 on 2019-02-08T20:13:54Z with date 2021-02-08 by astein@illinois.edu.","Limited Restriction set for Item 109539 on 2019-02-08T20:14:00Z with date 2021-02-08 by astein@illinois.edu.","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 109539 on 2021-02-08T10:15:18Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/102521"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2018 Rajesh Kandel"],"dc:subject":["Cuyahoga","estimation","Grand","Linear Interpolation","nutrient load","LOADEST","Maumee","nitrate","nutrient concentration","WRTDS"],"dc:title":["Comparative analysis of nitrate load estimation techniques in watersheds with different land-use characteristics"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agricultural & Biological Engr"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:42Z"}