{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101715"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101715","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Choosing team members: taking personality and perceived personality into account","abstract":"Technological advances have led to an increase in teams that self-assemble, meaning individuals have more power to choose whom they want to work with. This study aims to understand the mechanisms behind teammate choice. Specifically, a qualitative study and a social network approach were used to investigate the characteristics individuals take into consideration when choosing teammates. Two themes emerged from the qualitative study, indicating that individuals consider both accessibility (e.g., friendship and physical proximity) and desirable characteristics (e.g., conscientiousness and complementary skills) when choosing teammates. The quantitative social network study (on a sample of N=304 college students who completed sociometric measures of teammate invitations and personality) demonstrated that individuals tended to send teammate invitations to those: (a) whom they perceive to exhibit higher extraversion and lower neuroticism, (b) with whom they are familiar (i.e., via friendship and prior collaboration), and (c) who were similar to themselves (personality homophily) in three traits: emotional intelligence, preference for teamwork, and neuroticism. Further, the accuracy with which the teammate invitation sender perceives the self-rated personality of the target of the invitation (i.e., self-other correspondence in rated personality/attributes) is moderated/strengthened by familiarity, for the attributes of extraversion, neuroticism, emotional intelligence, and exam grades.","abstract_html":"Technological advances have led to an increase in teams that self-assemble, meaning individuals have more power to choose whom they want to work with. This study aims to understand the mechanisms behind teammate choice. Specifically, a qualitative study and a social network approach were used to investigate the characteristics individuals take into consideration when choosing teammates. Two themes emerged from the qualitative study, indicating that individuals consider both accessibility (e.g., friendship and physical proximity) and desirable characteristics (e.g., conscientiousness and complementary skills) when choosing teammates. The quantitative social network study (on a sample of N=304 college students who completed sociometric measures of teammate invitations and personality) demonstrated that individuals tended to send teammate invitations to those: (a) whom they perceive to exhibit higher extraversion and lower neuroticism, (b) with whom they are familiar (i.e., via friendship and prior collaboration), and (c) who were similar to themselves (personality homophily) in three traits: emotional intelligence, preference for teamwork, and neuroticism. Further, the accuracy with which the teammate invitation sender perceives the self-rated personality of the target of the invitation (i.e., self-other correspondence in rated personality/attributes) is moderated/strengthened by familiarity, for the attributes of extraversion, neuroticism, emotional intelligence, and exam grades.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Rangel, Bertha"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Newman, Daniel A.","Carpenter, Nichelle C.","DeChurch, Leslie A","Fraley, Robert C","Rounds, James","Hulin, Charles L."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-09-27T16:34:20Z","date_published":"2018-09-27T16:34:20Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:40Z","subjects":["self-organized teams, ERGM, personality"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2018 Bertha Rangel"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101715","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Newman, Daniel A.","Carpenter, Nichelle C.","DeChurch, Leslie A","Fraley, Robert C","Rounds, James","Hulin, Charles L."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Rangel, Bertha"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2018-09-27T16:34:20Z","2020-09-28T09:15:16Z","2018-07-13","2018-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["self-organized teams, ERGM, personality"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2018 Bertha Rangel"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101715"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Technological advances have led to an increase in teams that self-assemble, meaning individuals have more power to choose whom they want to work with. This study aims to understand the mechanisms behind teammate choice. Specifically, a qualitative study and a social network approach were used to investigate the characteristics individuals take into consideration when choosing teammates. Two themes emerged from the qualitative study, indicating that individuals consider both accessibility (e.g., friendship and physical proximity) and desirable characteristics (e.g., conscientiousness and complementary skills) when choosing teammates. The quantitative social network study (on a sample of N=304 college students who completed sociometric measures of teammate invitations and personality) demonstrated that individuals tended to send teammate invitations to those: (a) whom they perceive to exhibit higher extraversion and lower neuroticism, (b) with whom they are familiar (i.e., via friendship and prior collaboration), and (c) who were similar to themselves (personality homophily) in three traits: emotional intelligence, preference for teamwork, and neuroticism. Further, the accuracy with which the teammate invitation sender perceives the self-rated personality of the target of the invitation (i.e., self-other correspondence in rated personality/attributes) is moderated/strengthened by familiarity, for the attributes of extraversion, neuroticism, emotional intelligence, and exam grades.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2020-08-01","The student, Bertha Rangel, accepted the attached license on 2018-07-13 at 11:49.","The student, Bertha Rangel, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2018-07-13 at 11:58.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2018-07-13 at 12:50.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12869 on 2018-09-27 at 11:19:19","Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:34:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 RANGEL-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf: 1224459 bytes, checksum: fea41e31fbee43eca92641e821f8d988 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: bee14af0ed2c206c515e9ddb2769ff0c (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4556 bytes, checksum: 6bb4ec952b8979b87877fb6fa003e969 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 107815 Lift date: 2020-09-27T16:34:29Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 107815 on 2020-09-28T09:15:16Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Choosing team members: taking personality and perceived personality into account"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Newman, Daniel A.","Carpenter, Nichelle C.","DeChurch, Leslie A","Fraley, Robert C","Rounds, James","Hulin, Charles L."],"dc:creator":["Rangel, Bertha"],"dc:date":["2018-09-27T16:34:20Z","2020-09-28T09:15:16Z","2018-07-13","2018-08"],"dc:description":["Technological advances have led to an increase in teams that self-assemble, meaning individuals have more power to choose whom they want to work with. This study aims to understand the mechanisms behind teammate choice. Specifically, a qualitative study and a social network approach were used to investigate the characteristics individuals take into consideration when choosing teammates. Two themes emerged from the qualitative study, indicating that individuals consider both accessibility (e.g., friendship and physical proximity) and desirable characteristics (e.g., conscientiousness and complementary skills) when choosing teammates. The quantitative social network study (on a sample of N=304 college students who completed sociometric measures of teammate invitations and personality) demonstrated that individuals tended to send teammate invitations to those: (a) whom they perceive to exhibit higher extraversion and lower neuroticism, (b) with whom they are familiar (i.e., via friendship and prior collaboration), and (c) who were similar to themselves (personality homophily) in three traits: emotional intelligence, preference for teamwork, and neuroticism. Further, the accuracy with which the teammate invitation sender perceives the self-rated personality of the target of the invitation (i.e., self-other correspondence in rated personality/attributes) is moderated/strengthened by familiarity, for the attributes of extraversion, neuroticism, emotional intelligence, and exam grades.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2020-08-01","The student, Bertha Rangel, accepted the attached license on 2018-07-13 at 11:49.","The student, Bertha Rangel, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2018-07-13 at 11:58.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2018-07-13 at 12:50.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12869 on 2018-09-27 at 11:19:19","Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:34:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 RANGEL-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf: 1224459 bytes, checksum: fea41e31fbee43eca92641e821f8d988 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: bee14af0ed2c206c515e9ddb2769ff0c (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4556 bytes, checksum: 6bb4ec952b8979b87877fb6fa003e969 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 107815 Lift date: 2020-09-27T16:34:29Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 107815 on 2020-09-28T09:15:16Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101715"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2018 Bertha Rangel"],"dc:subject":["self-organized teams, ERGM, personality"],"dc:title":["Choosing team members: taking personality and perceived personality into account"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:40Z"}