{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101709"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101709","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Optimization through standardization: Investigating the efficacy of online peer review training for university ESL students","abstract":"Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:34:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LATHAM-THESIS-2018.pdf: 1216632 bytes, checksum: a18e467343a541bb9d41ac0c89aae780 (MD5) Latham MATESL Thesis_20180713.docx: 495360 bytes, checksum: 19f6382fa1e9a66a3df5fdd5bcdb6ae6 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 25b699ec586d68da7a912a561384e376 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-13","abstract_html":"Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:34:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LATHAM-THESIS-2018.pdf: 1216632 bytes, checksum: a18e467343a541bb9d41ac0c89aae780 (MD5) Latham MATESL Thesis_20180713.docx: 495360 bytes, checksum: 19f6382fa1e9a66a3df5fdd5bcdb6ae6 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 25b699ec586d68da7a912a561384e376 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-13","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Latham, Erika M."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Teaching of English Sec Lang","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Yan, Xun","McIntosh, Kyle"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-09-27T16:34:19Z","date_published":"2018-09-27T16:34:19Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:40Z","subjects":["Peer Review","Peer Feedback","ESL","English Composition","Second Language Writing","Formative Assessment","Assessment as Learning"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2018 Erika Latham"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101709","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Yan, Xun","McIntosh, Kyle"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Latham, Erika M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2018-09-27T16:34:19Z","2020-09-28T09:15:13Z","2018-07-13","2018-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teaching of English Sec Lang"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Peer Review","Peer Feedback","ESL","English Composition","Second Language Writing","Formative Assessment","Assessment as Learning"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2018 Erika Latham"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101709"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:34:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LATHAM-THESIS-2018.pdf: 1216632 bytes, checksum: a18e467343a541bb9d41ac0c89aae780 (MD5) Latham MATESL Thesis_20180713.docx: 495360 bytes, checksum: 19f6382fa1e9a66a3df5fdd5bcdb6ae6 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 25b699ec586d68da7a912a561384e376 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 107809 Lift date: 2020-09-27T16:34:29Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 107809 on 2020-09-28T09:15:13Z.","Providing feedback on student compositions has always been an important part of both L1 and L2 writing instruction. However, peer feedback as an assessment activity remains somewhat controversial and underexplored. Many of the concerns related to the validity of peer assessment can be mitigated by first training students in how to give feedback; however, the way training is delivered varies greatly in the literature and even among instructors in the same writing program. This lack of standardization limits the quality of peer review training and thereby the effectiveness of peer assessment. The current study addresses the issue of unstandardized peer review training by pilot-testing a standardized online training program, which can ensure consistency of peer feedback across face-to-face and online class sections. Employing a 2x2 factorial, mixed-methods design, this study examines the effect of standardized online training versus unstandardized classroom training on the quality of peer assessment. Data was collected using a pre-review background questionnaire, a peer review worksheet, and a post-review questionnaire to elicit participants’ (1) prior experience with peer review; (2) comments on a sample essay; and (3) perceptions of peer review and training. Participants’ comments on the essay were examined according to topics mentioned, specificity, and politeness. Participants’ comments and perceptions were first qualitatively coded, then converted to frequencies and percentages for comparison. Quantitative results reveal that standardized training increased participants’ focus on content-related topics as well as their specificity and politeness. Conversely, the classroom training had little effect on any of these features and instead kept participants focused primarily on surface-level features such as lexico-grammar and rhetorical structure. Qualitative results show that participants perceived a variety of learning outcomes after participating in the peer review activity, demonstrating the value of peer review as an assessment as learning activity rather than solely a source of corrective feedback.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2020-08-01","The student, Erika Latham, accepted the attached license on 2018-07-11 at 15:56.","The student, Erika Latham, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2018-07-11 at 16:08.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2018-07-13 at 15:47.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12833 on 2018-09-27 at 11:19:14"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Optimization through standardization: Investigating the efficacy of online peer review training for university ESL students"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Yan, Xun","McIntosh, Kyle"],"dc:creator":["Latham, Erika M."],"dc:date":["2018-09-27T16:34:19Z","2020-09-28T09:15:13Z","2018-07-13","2018-08"],"dc:description":["Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:34:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LATHAM-THESIS-2018.pdf: 1216632 bytes, checksum: a18e467343a541bb9d41ac0c89aae780 (MD5) Latham MATESL Thesis_20180713.docx: 495360 bytes, checksum: 19f6382fa1e9a66a3df5fdd5bcdb6ae6 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 25b699ec586d68da7a912a561384e376 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 107809 Lift date: 2020-09-27T16:34:29Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 107809 on 2020-09-28T09:15:13Z.","Providing feedback on student compositions has always been an important part of both L1 and L2 writing instruction. However, peer feedback as an assessment activity remains somewhat controversial and underexplored. Many of the concerns related to the validity of peer assessment can be mitigated by first training students in how to give feedback; however, the way training is delivered varies greatly in the literature and even among instructors in the same writing program. This lack of standardization limits the quality of peer review training and thereby the effectiveness of peer assessment. The current study addresses the issue of unstandardized peer review training by pilot-testing a standardized online training program, which can ensure consistency of peer feedback across face-to-face and online class sections. Employing a 2x2 factorial, mixed-methods design, this study examines the effect of standardized online training versus unstandardized classroom training on the quality of peer assessment. Data was collected using a pre-review background questionnaire, a peer review worksheet, and a post-review questionnaire to elicit participants’ (1) prior experience with peer review; (2) comments on a sample essay; and (3) perceptions of peer review and training. Participants’ comments on the essay were examined according to topics mentioned, specificity, and politeness. Participants’ comments and perceptions were first qualitatively coded, then converted to frequencies and percentages for comparison. Quantitative results reveal that standardized training increased participants’ focus on content-related topics as well as their specificity and politeness. Conversely, the classroom training had little effect on any of these features and instead kept participants focused primarily on surface-level features such as lexico-grammar and rhetorical structure. Qualitative results show that participants perceived a variety of learning outcomes after participating in the peer review activity, demonstrating the value of peer review as an assessment as learning activity rather than solely a source of corrective feedback.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2020-08-01","The student, Erika Latham, accepted the attached license on 2018-07-11 at 15:56.","The student, Erika Latham, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2018-07-11 at 16:08.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2018-07-13 at 15:47.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12833 on 2018-09-27 at 11:19:14"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101709"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2018 Erika Latham"],"dc:subject":["Peer Review","Peer Feedback","ESL","English Composition","Second Language Writing","Formative Assessment","Assessment as Learning"],"dc:title":["Optimization through standardization: Investigating the efficacy of online peer review training for university ESL students"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teaching of English Sec Lang"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:40Z"}