{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101585"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/101585","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Examination of the effectiveness of a criteria-based team formation tool","abstract":"CATME is a tool that implements a criteria-based team formation approach. The tool facilitates forming teams based on criteria like demographics, skills, and work styles. This information is collected from the students via an online survey. The effectiveness of this genre of tool depends on the practicality of the instructor’s configuration of the criteria, the veracity of students’ responses to the survey, and the soundness of the algorithm. In this thesis, we investigate potential issues affecting these factors. Our study was conducted by performing new analysis of data collected from a prior study comparing the performance of teams formed using CATME or randomly in a user interface design course. The performance of teams was not statistically different between the two conditions. In examining the students’ responses to the team formation survey, we found issues related to Self-Assessment such as inconsistencies between students’ ratings of their skills and reporting of their strongest skills, and potential cases of misreports. Likewise, we found some cases where the tool produced unexpected results when calculating the homogeneity of the skills of a team. Implications for instructors and tool designers to mitigate these problems are discussed.","abstract_html":"CATME is a tool that implements a criteria-based team formation approach. The tool facilitates forming teams based on criteria like demographics, skills, and work styles. This information is collected from the students via an online survey. The effectiveness of this genre of tool depends on the practicality of the instructor’s configuration of the criteria, the veracity of students’ responses to the survey, and the soundness of the algorithm. In this thesis, we investigate potential issues affecting these factors. Our study was conducted by performing new analysis of data collected from a prior study comparing the performance of teams formed using CATME or randomly in a user interface design course. The performance of teams was not statistically different between the two conditions. In examining the students’ responses to the team formation survey, we found issues related to Self-Assessment such as inconsistencies between students’ ratings of their skills and reporting of their strongest skills, and potential cases of misreports. Likewise, we found some cases where the tool produced unexpected results when calculating the homogeneity of the skills of a team. Implications for instructors and tool designers to mitigate these problems are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Alamri, Albatool A."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Computer Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bailey, Brian"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-09-27T16:17:52Z","date_published":"2018-09-27T16:17:52Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:40Z","subjects":["Team Formation, CATME, Criteria-based Approach, Student's Self-Assessment"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2018 Albatool Alamri"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101585","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bailey, Brian"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Alamri, Albatool A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2018-09-27T16:17:52Z","2018-07-17","2018-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Computer Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Team Formation, CATME, Criteria-based Approach, Student's Self-Assessment"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2018 Albatool Alamri"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101585"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["CATME is a tool that implements a criteria-based team formation approach. The tool facilitates forming teams based on criteria like demographics, skills, and work styles. This information is collected from the students via an online survey. The effectiveness of this genre of tool depends on the practicality of the instructor’s configuration of the criteria, the veracity of students’ responses to the survey, and the soundness of the algorithm. In this thesis, we investigate potential issues affecting these factors. Our study was conducted by performing new analysis of data collected from a prior study comparing the performance of teams formed using CATME or randomly in a user interface design course. The performance of teams was not statistically different between the two conditions. In examining the students’ responses to the team formation survey, we found issues related to Self-Assessment such as inconsistencies between students’ ratings of their skills and reporting of their strongest skills, and potential cases of misreports. Likewise, we found some cases where the tool produced unexpected results when calculating the homogeneity of the skills of a team. Implications for instructors and tool designers to mitigate these problems are discussed.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2018-09-27 without embargo terms","The student, Albatool Alamri, accepted the attached license on 2018-07-13 at 22:34.","The student, Albatool Alamri, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2018-07-13 at 22:36.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2018-07-17 at 15:10.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12876 on 2018-09-27 at 10:48:33","Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:17:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 ALAMRI-THESIS-2018.pdf: 432148 bytes, checksum: 4a620fbc074949537e0b59eebab6f433 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 902303b4cfd6d57fc59e5f7bfaa6f942 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-17"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Examination of the effectiveness of a criteria-based team formation tool"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bailey, Brian"],"dc:creator":["Alamri, Albatool A."],"dc:date":["2018-09-27T16:17:52Z","2018-07-17","2018-08"],"dc:description":["CATME is a tool that implements a criteria-based team formation approach. The tool facilitates forming teams based on criteria like demographics, skills, and work styles. This information is collected from the students via an online survey. The effectiveness of this genre of tool depends on the practicality of the instructor’s configuration of the criteria, the veracity of students’ responses to the survey, and the soundness of the algorithm. In this thesis, we investigate potential issues affecting these factors. Our study was conducted by performing new analysis of data collected from a prior study comparing the performance of teams formed using CATME or randomly in a user interface design course. The performance of teams was not statistically different between the two conditions. In examining the students’ responses to the team formation survey, we found issues related to Self-Assessment such as inconsistencies between students’ ratings of their skills and reporting of their strongest skills, and potential cases of misreports. Likewise, we found some cases where the tool produced unexpected results when calculating the homogeneity of the skills of a team. Implications for instructors and tool designers to mitigate these problems are discussed.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2018-09-27 without embargo terms","The student, Albatool Alamri, accepted the attached license on 2018-07-13 at 22:34.","The student, Albatool Alamri, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2018-07-13 at 22:36.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2018-07-17 at 15:10.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12876 on 2018-09-27 at 10:48:33","Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T16:17:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 ALAMRI-THESIS-2018.pdf: 432148 bytes, checksum: 4a620fbc074949537e0b59eebab6f433 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 902303b4cfd6d57fc59e5f7bfaa6f942 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-17"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/101585"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2018 Albatool Alamri"],"dc:subject":["Team Formation, CATME, Criteria-based Approach, Student's Self-Assessment"],"dc:title":["Examination of the effectiveness of a criteria-based team formation tool"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Computer Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:40Z"}