{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/100959"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/100959","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Performance evaluation reform act (pera): A case study of principal evaluation implementation in illinois","abstract":"With reform efforts heavily focused on improving educational opportunities for students in the United States over the last decade, schools have been called to task to revamp their teacher and principal evaluation processes. The related empirical published research focuses on the evaluation of teachers, and there exists a very limited research base devoted to the evaluation of principals. We know that effective teachers and sound leadership have an effect on student achievement. Much of the research on this topic is related to improving teaching practice in the classroom and shifting from the managerial roles of a principal to being an instructional leader. This qualitative case study investigated how principals and their evaluators in two Illinois school districts made sense of and constructed new meaning around policy for principal evaluation as outlined in the Performance Evaluation Reform Act, PERA. This study further examined how these individual perceptions and district resources or structures effect the effort to implement a new performance-based evaluation system of principals including professional practice, performance indicators/measures of student growth, and self-assessment. Participants in this study were principals and the principal evaluators from two large, urban-fringe school districts. Policy implementation and sensemaking were the theoretical frameworks used to examine the understanding, structures, and practices involved in the implementation of the new evaluation process. Data sources were demographic survey information, semi-structured interviews of principals and their evaluators, and document review.","abstract_html":"With reform efforts heavily focused on improving educational opportunities for students in the United States over the last decade, schools have been called to task to revamp their teacher and principal evaluation processes. The related empirical published research focuses on the evaluation of teachers, and there exists a very limited research base devoted to the evaluation of principals. We know that effective teachers and sound leadership have an effect on student achievement. Much of the research on this topic is related to improving teaching practice in the classroom and shifting from the managerial roles of a principal to being an instructional leader. This qualitative case study investigated how principals and their evaluators in two Illinois school districts made sense of and constructed new meaning around policy for principal evaluation as outlined in the Performance Evaluation Reform Act, PERA. This study further examined how these individual perceptions and district resources or structures effect the effort to implement a new performance-based evaluation system of principals including professional practice, performance indicators/measures of student growth, and self-assessment. Participants in this study were principals and the principal evaluators from two large, urban-fringe school districts. Policy implementation and sensemaking were the theoretical frameworks used to examine the understanding, structures, and practices involved in the implementation of the new evaluation process. Data sources were demographic survey information, semi-structured interviews of principals and their evaluators, and document review.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Robinson, Kathleen Marie"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ed.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Ed Organization and Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Welton, Anjalé","Alexander, Kern","Anderson, James D.","Herrmann, Mary"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-09-04T20:27:00Z","date_published":"2018-09-04T20:27:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:38Z","subjects":["Principal Evaluation","Performance Evaluation Reform Act"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["(Copyright 2018 Kathleen Robinson)"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/100959","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Welton, Anjalé","Alexander, Kern","Anderson, James D.","Herrmann, Mary"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Robinson, Kathleen Marie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2018-09-04T20:27:00Z","2018-04-13","2018-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Ed Organization and Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ed.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Principal Evaluation","Performance Evaluation Reform Act"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["(Copyright 2018 Kathleen Robinson)"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/100959"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["With reform efforts heavily focused on improving educational opportunities for students in the United States over the last decade, schools have been called to task to revamp their teacher and principal evaluation processes. The related empirical published research focuses on the evaluation of teachers, and there exists a very limited research base devoted to the evaluation of principals. We know that effective teachers and sound leadership have an effect on student achievement. Much of the research on this topic is related to improving teaching practice in the classroom and shifting from the managerial roles of a principal to being an instructional leader. This qualitative case study investigated how principals and their evaluators in two Illinois school districts made sense of and constructed new meaning around policy for principal evaluation as outlined in the Performance Evaluation Reform Act, PERA. This study further examined how these individual perceptions and district resources or structures effect the effort to implement a new performance-based evaluation system of principals including professional practice, performance indicators/measures of student growth, and self-assessment. Participants in this study were principals and the principal evaluators from two large, urban-fringe school districts. Policy implementation and sensemaking were the theoretical frameworks used to examine the understanding, structures, and practices involved in the implementation of the new evaluation process. Data sources were demographic survey information, semi-structured interviews of principals and their evaluators, and document review.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2018-08-31 without embargo terms","The student, Kathleen Robinson, accepted the attached license on 2018-04-11 at 14:13.","The student, Kathleen Robinson, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2018-04-11 at 14:47.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2018-04-13 at 08:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12191 on 2018-08-31 at 17:11:56","Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-04T20:27:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 ROBINSON-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf: 1508609 bytes, checksum: 6fed97076e32d5618d68cd06835a8bc8 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4214 bytes, checksum: dfb09ee04fa1a6a731e32e7766484007 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4560 bytes, checksum: 574c8c5b7ed4332f3604039741d9b1fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-04-13"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Performance evaluation reform act (pera): A case study of principal evaluation implementation in illinois"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Welton, Anjalé","Alexander, Kern","Anderson, James D.","Herrmann, Mary"],"dc:creator":["Robinson, Kathleen Marie"],"dc:date":["2018-09-04T20:27:00Z","2018-04-13","2018-05"],"dc:description":["With reform efforts heavily focused on improving educational opportunities for students in the United States over the last decade, schools have been called to task to revamp their teacher and principal evaluation processes. The related empirical published research focuses on the evaluation of teachers, and there exists a very limited research base devoted to the evaluation of principals. We know that effective teachers and sound leadership have an effect on student achievement. Much of the research on this topic is related to improving teaching practice in the classroom and shifting from the managerial roles of a principal to being an instructional leader. This qualitative case study investigated how principals and their evaluators in two Illinois school districts made sense of and constructed new meaning around policy for principal evaluation as outlined in the Performance Evaluation Reform Act, PERA. This study further examined how these individual perceptions and district resources or structures effect the effort to implement a new performance-based evaluation system of principals including professional practice, performance indicators/measures of student growth, and self-assessment. Participants in this study were principals and the principal evaluators from two large, urban-fringe school districts. Policy implementation and sensemaking were the theoretical frameworks used to examine the understanding, structures, and practices involved in the implementation of the new evaluation process. Data sources were demographic survey information, semi-structured interviews of principals and their evaluators, and document review.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2018-08-31 without embargo terms","The student, Kathleen Robinson, accepted the attached license on 2018-04-11 at 14:13.","The student, Kathleen Robinson, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2018-04-11 at 14:47.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2018-04-13 at 08:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #12191 on 2018-08-31 at 17:11:56","Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-04T20:27:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 ROBINSON-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf: 1508609 bytes, checksum: 6fed97076e32d5618d68cd06835a8bc8 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4214 bytes, checksum: dfb09ee04fa1a6a731e32e7766484007 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4560 bytes, checksum: 574c8c5b7ed4332f3604039741d9b1fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-04-13"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/100959"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["(Copyright 2018 Kathleen Robinson)"],"dc:subject":["Principal Evaluation","Performance Evaluation Reform Act"],"dc:title":["Performance evaluation reform act (pera): A case study of principal evaluation implementation in illinois"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Ed Organization and Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ed.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:38Z"}