{"id":{"repo_id":"uiii","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.uiii.ac.id:20.500.14576/318"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiii/oai:repository.uiii.ac.id:20.500.14576/318","repository":{"repo_id":"uiii","name":"Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia","base_url":"https://api-repository.uiii.ac.id/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Unravelling the dynamics of authoritarian strategies : a comparative study of Suharto’s new order in Indonesia and Jammeh’s rule in the Gambia","abstract":"The dynamics of authoritarian power consolidation is receiving more attention today than it has ever been before as a result of rising authoritarianism and democratic backsliding. However, there exists an undertheorized and variations on autocrat’s decision calculus for prioritizing repression over co-optation, vice versa. Drawing from this, I make two assumptions that state: 1. Low resource endowment leads to high repression, and 2. High resource endowment leads to low repression and high co-optation. To understand this phenomenon, I compared Yahya Jammeh (1994–2016) in the Gambia (a low resource authoritarian regime) and Suharto (1966–1998) in Indonesia (a high resource authoritarian regime). I used the Gambian case (1994-2016) to explain the first assumption, and the second assumption is examined using the case of Indonesia (1965-1998). By observation, both regimes on the surface appear similar as both were military juntas in Muslimmajority countries. However, the literature shows that their authoritarian strategies and tactics varied in profoundly – Jammeh primarily imposed repression as strategy, whereas Suharto was inclined more towards co-optation. However, I do not argue that this explanation is exclusive, as it is context dependent. To examine this phenomenon, I drew data from government websites, international reports, journal articles, news outlets, and other online resources. Thus, this study intends to contribute to the understanding of autocrats’ decision-making strategyies.","abstract_html":"The dynamics of authoritarian power consolidation is receiving more attention today than it has ever been before as a result of rising authoritarianism and democratic backsliding. However, there exists an undertheorized and variations on autocrat’s decision calculus for prioritizing repression over co-optation, vice versa. Drawing from this, I make two assumptions that state: 1. Low resource endowment leads to high repression, and 2. High resource endowment leads to low repression and high co-optation. To understand this phenomenon, I compared Yahya Jammeh (1994–2016) in the Gambia (a low resource authoritarian regime) and Suharto (1966–1998) in Indonesia (a high resource authoritarian regime). I used the Gambian case (1994-2016) to explain the first assumption, and the second assumption is examined using the case of Indonesia (1965-1998). By observation, both regimes on the surface appear similar as both were military juntas in Muslimmajority countries. However, the literature shows that their authoritarian strategies and tactics varied in profoundly – Jammeh primarily imposed repression as strategy, whereas Suharto was inclined more towards co-optation. However, I do not argue that this explanation is exclusive, as it is context dependent. To examine this phenomenon, I drew data from government websites, international reports, journal articles, news outlets, and other online resources. Thus, this study intends to contribute to the understanding of autocrats’ decision-making strategyies.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bah, Musa"],"institution":"Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia","degree_name":"M.A., Political Science","degree_level":"Master of Arts","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Gde Dwitya Arief Metera","Djayadi Hanan"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-07-20","date_published":"2024-07-20","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:43:36Z","subjects":["Autocrat","Authoritarianism","Repression","Co-optation","Resource endowment"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["All Rights Reserved"],"rights_urls":["https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14576/318","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Gde Dwitya Arief Metera","Djayadi Hanan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bah, Musa"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2024-09-09T11:54:41Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-09-09T11:54:41Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2024-07-20"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master of Arts"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A., Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Faculty of Social Sciences"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Autocrat","Authoritarianism","Repression","Co-optation","Resource endowment"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["All Rights Reserved"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14576/318"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The dynamics of authoritarian power consolidation is receiving more attention today than it has ever been before as a result of rising authoritarianism and democratic backsliding. However, there exists an undertheorized and variations on autocrat’s decision calculus for prioritizing repression over co-optation, vice versa. Drawing from this, I make two assumptions that state: 1. Low resource endowment leads to high repression, and 2. High resource endowment leads to low repression and high co-optation. To understand this phenomenon, I compared Yahya Jammeh (1994–2016) in the Gambia (a low resource authoritarian regime) and Suharto (1966–1998) in Indonesia (a high resource authoritarian regime). I used the Gambian case (1994-2016) to explain the first assumption, and the second assumption is examined using the case of Indonesia (1965-1998). By observation, both regimes on the surface appear similar as both were military juntas in Muslimmajority countries. However, the literature shows that their authoritarian strategies and tactics varied in profoundly – Jammeh primarily imposed repression as strategy, whereas Suharto was inclined more towards co-optation. However, I do not argue that this explanation is exclusive, as it is context dependent. To examine this phenomenon, I drew data from government websites, international reports, journal articles, news outlets, and other online resources. Thus, this study intends to contribute to the understanding of autocrats’ decision-making strategyies."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Unravelling the dynamics of authoritarian strategies : a comparative study of Suharto’s new order in Indonesia and Jammeh’s rule in the Gambia"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Gde Dwitya Arief Metera","Djayadi Hanan"],"dc:creator":["Bah, Musa"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2024-09-09T11:54:41Z"],"dc:date.available":["2024-09-09T11:54:41Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2024-07-20"],"dc:description.abstract":["The dynamics of authoritarian power consolidation is receiving more attention today than it has ever been before as a result of rising authoritarianism and democratic backsliding. However, there exists an undertheorized and variations on autocrat’s decision calculus for prioritizing repression over co-optation, vice versa. Drawing from this, I make two assumptions that state: 1. Low resource endowment leads to high repression, and 2. High resource endowment leads to low repression and high co-optation. To understand this phenomenon, I compared Yahya Jammeh (1994–2016) in the Gambia (a low resource authoritarian regime) and Suharto (1966–1998) in Indonesia (a high resource authoritarian regime). I used the Gambian case (1994-2016) to explain the first assumption, and the second assumption is examined using the case of Indonesia (1965-1998). By observation, both regimes on the surface appear similar as both were military juntas in Muslimmajority countries. However, the literature shows that their authoritarian strategies and tactics varied in profoundly – Jammeh primarily imposed repression as strategy, whereas Suharto was inclined more towards co-optation. However, I do not argue that this explanation is exclusive, as it is context dependent. To examine this phenomenon, I drew data from government websites, international reports, journal articles, news outlets, and other online resources. Thus, this study intends to contribute to the understanding of autocrats’ decision-making strategyies."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14576/318"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia"],"dc:rights":["All Rights Reserved"],"dc:rights.uri":["https://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/"],"dc:subject":["Autocrat","Authoritarianism","Repression","Co-optation","Resource endowment"],"dc:title":["Unravelling the dynamics of authoritarian strategies : a comparative study of Suharto’s new order in Indonesia and Jammeh’s rule in the Gambia"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master of Arts"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A., Political Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Faculty of Social Sciences"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:43:36Z"}