{"id":{"repo_id":"uhi-uk","oai_identifier":"oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uhi-uk/oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55","repository":{"repo_id":"uhi-uk","name":"University of the Highlands and Islands","base_url":"https://pureadmin.uhi.ac.uk/ws/oai"},"display":{"title":"Are the Princetonians Passé?: Evaluating the post-conservative critique of Charles Hodge","abstract":"The theological method of Charles Hodge is widely recognized as a major influence on American evangelical theology. Consequently, the merits and liabilities of Hodge‘s theology, particularly his epistemological influences, most notably Scottish Common Sense Realism, have made Hodge‘s theology and epistemology the focus of much analysis and debate. This present work examines and evaluates three prominent objections to Hodge‘s epistemological use of Scottish Realism and its theological effects, with the primary focus on recent criticisms raised by ―post-conservatives‖ based upon postmodern criticisms of the credibility of foundationalism, propositionalism, and realism. The conclusion drawn and defended is that Hodge‘s theological method, particularly his use of Scottish Realism, while in need of some modification, is plausible, even in a postmodern context.","abstract_html":"The theological method of Charles Hodge is widely recognized as a major influence on American evangelical theology. Consequently, the merits and liabilities of Hodge‘s theology, particularly his epistemological influences, most notably Scottish Common Sense Realism, have made Hodge‘s theology and epistemology the focus of much analysis and debate. This present work examines and evaluates three prominent objections to Hodge‘s epistemological use of Scottish Realism and its theological effects, with the primary focus on recent criticisms raised by ―post-conservatives‖ based upon postmodern criticisms of the credibility of foundationalism, propositionalism, and realism. The conclusion drawn and defended is that Hodge‘s theological method, particularly his use of Scottish Realism, while in need of some modification, is plausible, even in a postmodern context.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gurney, Michael Lawrence"],"institution":"University of Edinburgh","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (awarded by OU/Aberdeen)","degree_level":"Doctoral Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Helm, Paul"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-5-2","date_published":"2012-5-2","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:12:04Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55"],"render_values":[{"text":"oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Helm, Paul"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gurney, Michael Lawrence"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-5-2"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2012-5-2"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Highland Theological College UHI"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Edinburgh"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Doctoral Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (awarded by OU/Aberdeen)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55","https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/files/3067995/Michael_Gurney_thesis.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The theological method of Charles Hodge is widely recognized as a major influence on American evangelical theology. Consequently, the merits and liabilities of Hodge‘s theology, particularly his epistemological influences, most notably Scottish Common Sense Realism, have made Hodge‘s theology and epistemology the focus of much analysis and debate. This present work examines and evaluates three prominent objections to Hodge‘s epistemological use of Scottish Realism and its theological effects, with the primary focus on recent criticisms raised by ―post-conservatives‖ based upon postmodern criticisms of the credibility of foundationalism, propositionalism, and realism. The conclusion drawn and defended is that Hodge‘s theological method, particularly his use of Scottish Realism, while in need of some modification, is plausible, even in a postmodern context."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Are the Princetonians Passé?: Evaluating the post-conservative critique of Charles Hodge"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Helm, Paul"],"dc:creator":["Gurney, Michael Lawrence"],"dc:date":["2012-5-2"],"dc:date.issued":["2012-5-2"],"dc:description.abstract":["The theological method of Charles Hodge is widely recognized as a major influence on American evangelical theology. Consequently, the merits and liabilities of Hodge‘s theology, particularly his epistemological influences, most notably Scottish Common Sense Realism, have made Hodge‘s theology and epistemology the focus of much analysis and debate. This present work examines and evaluates three prominent objections to Hodge‘s epistemological use of Scottish Realism and its theological effects, with the primary focus on recent criticisms raised by ―post-conservatives‖ based upon postmodern criticisms of the credibility of foundationalism, propositionalism, and realism. The conclusion drawn and defended is that Hodge‘s theological method, particularly his use of Scottish Realism, while in need of some modification, is plausible, even in a postmodern context."],"dc:identifier":["oai:pure.atira.dk:studenttheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55","https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/files/3067995/Michael_Gurney_thesis.pdf"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["Highland Theological College UHI"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Edinburgh"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/8d3918bd-5f20-4e15-8133-5e96c933af55"],"dc:title":["Are the Princetonians Passé?: Evaluating the post-conservative critique of Charles Hodge"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Doctoral Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Doctor of Philosophy (awarded by OU/Aberdeen)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:12:04Z"}