{"id":{"repo_id":"udel","oai_identifier":"oai:udspace.udel.edu:19716/30785"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/udel/oai:udspace.udel.edu:19716/30785","repository":{"repo_id":"udel","name":"University of Delaware","base_url":"https://udspace.udel.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Stochastic modeling of Karlotoxin&apos;s influence on prey","abstract":"Karlodinium veneficium is type of dinoflagellate that feeds on planktonic species such as Storeatula major.It is associated with fish kills due to harmful algae blooms by releasing a compound called Karlotoxin. This toxin is known to affect their prey&apos;s bio-locomotion by stunning them and slowing them down. In this dissertation, we investigate whether the toxin plays a crucial role in aggregating the prey around the predators. The effect of aggregating prey around the predators is ecologically significant since it greatly boosts K. veneficium&apos;s feeding and reproduction rate, leading to a population surge, eluding a possible mechanism for producing algal blooms. ☐ We closely examine the toxin&apos;s influence on the prey&apos;s probability density distribution under the Goldstein-Kac modeling framework with different assumptions on their relative speed in 1-D, with either the predator being stationary or swimming at a constant speed. When the predator is stationary, we fully solve the prey&apos;s density distribution for all times, and verify the result by a Monte-Carlo simulation. For a swimming predator, we find the steady-state density distribution of prey analytically. When the predator&apos;s speed is strictly greater (or less) than the prey, the results are verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. When their relative speed has roots, singularities occur in the Goldstein-Kac system, and we perform a local analysis for prey&apos;s density at steady-state near the roots using the method of Frobenius, and use the result to derive a scheme for finding the analytical solution. For the relative speed in this case, assuming a right-swimming Karlodinium, the roots will occur at the left and right of the Karlodinium and we can get at worst an integrable singularity and at least a local maximum in the wake (the left root), depending on the flipping rate and the slope of the relative speed at this root. Near the other root, the prey&apos;s density in either direction can be represented by a Taylor series and is thus smooth. With the presence of roots for the relative speed, the analytical solution is verified by a finite difference scheme due to poor performance in Monte-Carlo simulations. ☐ For all the cases mentioned above, toxin changes the prey&apos;s distribution and in most cases leads to aggregation, however the maximum density does not always occur where the toxin has the highest concentration. In reality, such a result suggests that toxin density greatly influences the prey&apos;s distribution, however the distribution is also a result of predator and prey&apos;s relative movement. When their relative speed is of single sign, the toxin dominates. When their relative speed fluctuates around 0, both the toxin and their relative movements contributes to prey&apos;s distribution.","abstract_html":"Karlodinium veneficium is type of dinoflagellate that feeds on planktonic species such as Storeatula major.It is associated with fish kills due to harmful algae blooms by releasing a compound called Karlotoxin. This toxin is known to affect their prey&amp;apos;s bio-locomotion by stunning them and slowing them down. In this dissertation, we investigate whether the toxin plays a crucial role in aggregating the prey around the predators. The effect of aggregating prey around the predators is ecologically significant since it greatly boosts K. veneficium&amp;apos;s feeding and reproduction rate, leading to a population surge, eluding a possible mechanism for producing algal blooms. ☐ We closely examine the toxin&amp;apos;s influence on the prey&amp;apos;s probability density distribution under the Goldstein-Kac modeling framework with different assumptions on their relative speed in 1-D, with either the predator being stationary or swimming at a constant speed. When the predator is stationary, we fully solve the prey&amp;apos;s density distribution for all times, and verify the result by a Monte-Carlo simulation. For a swimming predator, we find the steady-state density distribution of prey analytically. When the predator&amp;apos;s speed is strictly greater (or less) than the prey, the results are verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. When their relative speed has roots, singularities occur in the Goldstein-Kac system, and we perform a local analysis for prey&amp;apos;s density at steady-state near the roots using the method of Frobenius, and use the result to derive a scheme for finding the analytical solution. For the relative speed in this case, assuming a right-swimming Karlodinium, the roots will occur at the left and right of the Karlodinium and we can get at worst an integrable singularity and at least a local maximum in the wake (the left root), depending on the flipping rate and the slope of the relative speed at this root. Near the other root, the prey&amp;apos;s density in either direction can be represented by a Taylor series and is thus smooth. With the presence of roots for the relative speed, the analytical solution is verified by a finite difference scheme due to poor performance in Monte-Carlo simulations. ☐ For all the cases mentioned above, toxin changes the prey&amp;apos;s distribution and in most cases leads to aggregation, however the maximum density does not always occur where the toxin has the highest concentration. In reality, such a result suggests that toxin density greatly influences the prey&amp;apos;s distribution, however the distribution is also a result of predator and prey&amp;apos;s relative movement. When their relative speed is of single sign, the toxin dominates. When their relative speed fluctuates around 0, both the toxin and their relative movements contributes to prey&amp;apos;s distribution.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pei, Hansen"],"institution":"University of Delaware","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021","date_published":"2021","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:11:20Z","subjects":["Aggregation","Microswimmer","Pattern formation","Plankton","Stochastic model"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.58088/6ddc-bc88"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.58088/6ddc-bc88","href":"https://doi.org/10.58088/6ddc-bc88","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/30785","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pei, Hansen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2022-04-14T11:57:46Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-04-14T11:57:46Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2021"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Delaware"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Aggregation","Microswimmer","Pattern formation","Plankton","Stochastic model"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.58088/6ddc-bc88"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/30785"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Karlodinium veneficium is type of dinoflagellate that feeds on planktonic species such as Storeatula major.It is associated with fish kills due to harmful algae blooms by releasing a compound called Karlotoxin. This toxin is known to affect their prey&apos;s bio-locomotion by stunning them and slowing them down. In this dissertation, we investigate whether the toxin plays a crucial role in aggregating the prey around the predators. The effect of aggregating prey around the predators is ecologically significant since it greatly boosts K. veneficium&apos;s feeding and reproduction rate, leading to a population surge, eluding a possible mechanism for producing algal blooms. ☐ We closely examine the toxin&apos;s influence on the prey&apos;s probability density distribution under the Goldstein-Kac modeling framework with different assumptions on their relative speed in 1-D, with either the predator being stationary or swimming at a constant speed. When the predator is stationary, we fully solve the prey&apos;s density distribution for all times, and verify the result by a Monte-Carlo simulation. For a swimming predator, we find the steady-state density distribution of prey analytically. When the predator&apos;s speed is strictly greater (or less) than the prey, the results are verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. When their relative speed has roots, singularities occur in the Goldstein-Kac system, and we perform a local analysis for prey&apos;s density at steady-state near the roots using the method of Frobenius, and use the result to derive a scheme for finding the analytical solution. For the relative speed in this case, assuming a right-swimming Karlodinium, the roots will occur at the left and right of the Karlodinium and we can get at worst an integrable singularity and at least a local maximum in the wake (the left root), depending on the flipping rate and the slope of the relative speed at this root. Near the other root, the prey&apos;s density in either direction can be represented by a Taylor series and is thus smooth. With the presence of roots for the relative speed, the analytical solution is verified by a finite difference scheme due to poor performance in Monte-Carlo simulations. ☐ For all the cases mentioned above, toxin changes the prey&apos;s distribution and in most cases leads to aggregation, however the maximum density does not always occur where the toxin has the highest concentration. In reality, such a result suggests that toxin density greatly influences the prey&apos;s distribution, however the distribution is also a result of predator and prey&apos;s relative movement. When their relative speed is of single sign, the toxin dominates. When their relative speed fluctuates around 0, both the toxin and their relative movements contributes to prey&apos;s distribution."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Stochastic modeling of Karlotoxin&apos;s influence on prey"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Pei, Hansen"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2022-04-14T11:57:46Z"],"dc:date.available":["2022-04-14T11:57:46Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2021"],"dc:description.abstract":["Karlodinium veneficium is type of dinoflagellate that feeds on planktonic species such as Storeatula major.It is associated with fish kills due to harmful algae blooms by releasing a compound called Karlotoxin. This toxin is known to affect their prey&apos;s bio-locomotion by stunning them and slowing them down. In this dissertation, we investigate whether the toxin plays a crucial role in aggregating the prey around the predators. The effect of aggregating prey around the predators is ecologically significant since it greatly boosts K. veneficium&apos;s feeding and reproduction rate, leading to a population surge, eluding a possible mechanism for producing algal blooms. ☐ We closely examine the toxin&apos;s influence on the prey&apos;s probability density distribution under the Goldstein-Kac modeling framework with different assumptions on their relative speed in 1-D, with either the predator being stationary or swimming at a constant speed. When the predator is stationary, we fully solve the prey&apos;s density distribution for all times, and verify the result by a Monte-Carlo simulation. For a swimming predator, we find the steady-state density distribution of prey analytically. When the predator&apos;s speed is strictly greater (or less) than the prey, the results are verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. When their relative speed has roots, singularities occur in the Goldstein-Kac system, and we perform a local analysis for prey&apos;s density at steady-state near the roots using the method of Frobenius, and use the result to derive a scheme for finding the analytical solution. For the relative speed in this case, assuming a right-swimming Karlodinium, the roots will occur at the left and right of the Karlodinium and we can get at worst an integrable singularity and at least a local maximum in the wake (the left root), depending on the flipping rate and the slope of the relative speed at this root. Near the other root, the prey&apos;s density in either direction can be represented by a Taylor series and is thus smooth. With the presence of roots for the relative speed, the analytical solution is verified by a finite difference scheme due to poor performance in Monte-Carlo simulations. ☐ For all the cases mentioned above, toxin changes the prey&apos;s distribution and in most cases leads to aggregation, however the maximum density does not always occur where the toxin has the highest concentration. In reality, such a result suggests that toxin density greatly influences the prey&apos;s distribution, however the distribution is also a result of predator and prey&apos;s relative movement. When their relative speed is of single sign, the toxin dominates. When their relative speed fluctuates around 0, both the toxin and their relative movements contributes to prey&apos;s distribution."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph.D."],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.58088/6ddc-bc88"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/30785"],"dc:publisher":["University of Delaware"],"dc:subject":["Aggregation","Microswimmer","Pattern formation","Plankton","Stochastic model"],"dc:title":["Stochastic modeling of Karlotoxin&apos;s influence on prey"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:11:20Z"}