{"id":{"repo_id":"ubc","oai_identifier":"oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/1526"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/ubc/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/1526","repository":{"repo_id":"ubc","name":"University of British Columbia","base_url":"http://circle.library.ubc.ca/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The appropriated carrying capacity of tomato production : comparing the ecological footprints of hydroponic greenhouse and mechanized field operations","abstract":"Agribusiness advocates claim that modern agro-technology has led to higher per hectare yields. In particular, hydroponic greenhouse agriculture is advanced as a new and particularly productive approach to high output farming. This may contribute to the belief that agricultural land can be urbanized because human ingenuity is seemingly developing substitutes for the lost soil. This thesis challenges this assumption by examining agricultural technology from an ecological perspective. It uses the concept of the ecological footprint (or appropriated carrying capacity) to compare the productivity of hydroponic agriculture with that of conventional open field operations. I assess and compare the biophysical inputs required by these operations to produce 1000 tonnes of tomatoes. These figures are then translated into corresponding land areas (in various categories) necessary to produce the required biophysical inputs. In contrast to common belief, hydroponic operations require 14 – 21 times more land than conventional open field operations to produce the same output (including the land directly occupied by the farms). This case study demonstrates the merits of appropriated carrying capacity analysis for assessing progress toward sustainability. It shows that hydroponic agriculture is a prime example of apparent economic success which is, in fact, ecologically unsustainable. There is no reason for confidence that we can pave over our agricultural lands just yet! Finally, this study demonstrates that the apparent yields of hydroponic greenhouse agriculture are partially a reflection of under priced resource inputs, a form of subsidy which is not sustainable.","abstract_html":"Agribusiness advocates claim that modern agro-technology has led to higher per hectare yields. In particular, hydroponic greenhouse agriculture is advanced as a new and particularly productive approach to high output farming. This may contribute to the belief that agricultural land can be urbanized because human ingenuity is seemingly developing substitutes for the lost soil. This thesis challenges this assumption by examining agricultural technology from an ecological perspective. It uses the concept of the ecological footprint (or appropriated carrying capacity) to compare the productivity of hydroponic agriculture with that of conventional open field operations. I assess and compare the biophysical inputs required by these operations to produce 1000 tonnes of tomatoes. These figures are then translated into corresponding land areas (in various categories) necessary to produce the required biophysical inputs. In contrast to common belief, hydroponic operations require 14 – 21 times more land than conventional open field operations to produce the same output (including the land directly occupied by the farms). This case study demonstrates the merits of appropriated carrying capacity analysis for assessing progress toward sustainability. It shows that hydroponic agriculture is a prime example of apparent economic success which is, in fact, ecologically unsustainable. There is no reason for confidence that we can pave over our agricultural lands just yet! Finally, this study demonstrates that the apparent yields of hydroponic greenhouse agriculture are partially a reflection of under priced resource inputs, a form of subsidy which is not sustainable.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wada, Yoshihiko"],"institution":"University of British Columbia","degree_name":"Master of Arts in Planning - MA (Plan)","degree_level":"master's","degree_discipline":"Planning","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1993,"date_issued":"1993","date_published":"1993","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:07:26Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1526","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wada, Yoshihiko"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1993"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of British Columbia"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Planning"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["master's"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts in Planning - MA (Plan)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of British Columbia"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1526","http://circle.library.ubc.ca/bitstream/2429/1526/1/ubc_1993_fall_wada_yoshihiko.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Agribusiness advocates claim that modern agro-technology has led to higher per hectare yields. In particular, hydroponic greenhouse agriculture is advanced as a new and particularly productive approach to high output farming. This may contribute to the belief that agricultural land can be urbanized because human ingenuity is seemingly developing substitutes for the lost soil. This thesis challenges this assumption by examining agricultural technology from an ecological perspective. It uses the concept of the ecological footprint (or appropriated carrying capacity) to compare the productivity of hydroponic agriculture with that of conventional open field operations. I assess and compare the biophysical inputs required by these operations to produce 1000 tonnes of tomatoes. These figures are then translated into corresponding land areas (in various categories) necessary to produce the required biophysical inputs. In contrast to common belief, hydroponic operations require 14 – 21 times more land than conventional open field operations to produce the same output (including the land directly occupied by the farms). This case study demonstrates the merits of appropriated carrying capacity analysis for assessing progress toward sustainability. It shows that hydroponic agriculture is a prime example of apparent economic success which is, in fact, ecologically unsustainable. There is no reason for confidence that we can pave over our agricultural lands just yet! Finally, this study demonstrates that the apparent yields of hydroponic greenhouse agriculture are partially a reflection of under priced resource inputs, a form of subsidy which is not sustainable."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["5061753","application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The appropriated carrying capacity of tomato production : comparing the ecological footprints of hydroponic greenhouse and mechanized field operations"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Wada, Yoshihiko"],"dc:date":["1993"],"dc:description":["Agribusiness advocates claim that modern agro-technology has led to higher per hectare yields. In particular, hydroponic greenhouse agriculture is advanced as a new and particularly productive approach to high output farming. This may contribute to the belief that agricultural land can be urbanized because human ingenuity is seemingly developing substitutes for the lost soil. This thesis challenges this assumption by examining agricultural technology from an ecological perspective. It uses the concept of the ecological footprint (or appropriated carrying capacity) to compare the productivity of hydroponic agriculture with that of conventional open field operations. I assess and compare the biophysical inputs required by these operations to produce 1000 tonnes of tomatoes. These figures are then translated into corresponding land areas (in various categories) necessary to produce the required biophysical inputs. In contrast to common belief, hydroponic operations require 14 – 21 times more land than conventional open field operations to produce the same output (including the land directly occupied by the farms). This case study demonstrates the merits of appropriated carrying capacity analysis for assessing progress toward sustainability. It shows that hydroponic agriculture is a prime example of apparent economic success which is, in fact, ecologically unsustainable. There is no reason for confidence that we can pave over our agricultural lands just yet! Finally, this study demonstrates that the apparent yields of hydroponic greenhouse agriculture are partially a reflection of under priced resource inputs, a form of subsidy which is not sustainable."],"dc:format":["5061753","application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1526","http://circle.library.ubc.ca/bitstream/2429/1526/1/ubc_1993_fall_wada_yoshihiko.pdf"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of British Columbia"],"dc:rights":["For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use."],"dc:title":["The appropriated carrying capacity of tomato production : comparing the ecological footprints of hydroponic greenhouse and mechanized field operations"],"dc:type":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Planning"],"thesis:degree_level":["master's"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts in Planning - MA (Plan)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of British Columbia"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:07:26Z"}